[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Health See other Health Articles Title: New Study Reveals Many Cancer Patients Are Killed By Chemotherapy & Not The Cancer New Study Reveals Many Cancer Patients Are Killed By Chemotherapy & Not The Cancer By Alanna Ketler Collective Evolution May 5, 2018 Up until recently, chemotherapy and radiation have been the only two approved treatment methods for treating cancer by mainstream medicine, but as more research emerges, light is being shed on just how damaging these treatment methods can be and how often they are the cause of death and not the cancer itself. Upon this discovery, many doctors are starting to see how this is not always the best treatment method. Researchers from Public Health England and Cancer Research UK recently performed a groundbreaking study, which examined the number of cancer patients who died within 30 days of beginning chemotherapy showing how the treatment, and not the cancer itself, was the cause of death. When looking at those death rates across hospitals in the U.K., the researchers found an alarming mortality rate that was directly associated with the chemotherapy treatment. “England around 8.4 per cent of patients with lung cancer, and 2.4 per cent of breast cancer patients died within a month,” the Telegraph reported. “But in some hospitals the figure was far higher. In Milton Keynes the death rate for lung cancer treatment was 50.9 per cent, although it was based on a very small number of patients.” Results of the study showed the one-month mortality rate at Lancashire Teaching Hospitals for those undergoing palliative, rather than curative chemotherapy was 28%. One in five patients receiving palliative care for breast cancer at Cambridge University Hospitals died from treatment. In other areas including, Blackpool, Coventry, Derby, South Tyneside, Surrey, and Sussex, saw that deaths from lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy were much higher than the national average. Cancer Lead for Public Health England, Dr. Jem Rashbass, requested the study and said, according to the Telegraph: “Chemotherapy is a vital part of cancer treatment and is a large reason behind the improved survival rates over the last four decades.” “However, it is powerful medication with significant side effects and often getting the balance right on which patients to treat aggressively can be hard.” “Those hospitals whose death rates are outside the expected range have had the findings shared with them and we have asked them to review their practice and data.” “All women with breast cancer and all men and women with lung cancer residing in England, who were 24 years older and who started a cycle” of chemotherapy in 2014 were included in the analysis by the researchers of the study. Could This Signify The End Of Chemo? Finally, chemotherapy has been looked at with a skeptical eye, had this been studied sooner, it is easy to see how this method of treatment cannot distinguish between healthy cells and cancerous cells, therefore there are more ideal patients for this method of treatment and less ideal patients. The study published by the Lancet shows how the cell destroying property of chemo can eventually lead to death as there aren’t enough healthy cells to survive. Because of these important findings, researchers have no advised physicians to exercise more caution in the process of vetting which patients should in fact receive chemotherapy and which, ideally should not. Older, infirm patients could potentially be better off without receiving palliative care. “The statistics don’t suggest bad practice overall but there are some outliers,” noted Professor David Dodwell of the Institute of Oncology at St. James Hospital in Leeds. “It could be data problems, and figures skewed because of just a few deaths, but nevertheless it could also be down to problems with clinical practice,” he continued. “I think it’s important to make patients aware that there are potentially life threatening downsides to chemotherapy. And doctors should be more careful about who they treat with chemotherapy.” It’s important to realize that doctors aren’t intending to harm their patients by prescribing this method of treatment, this is what they have been taught during their extensive years of schooling and education, this is the curriculum, so it’s the widely accepted treatment method for cancer even though it often doesn’t help at all and can make things worse as mentioned above. The hospitals involved maintain their stance, after reviewing the information that chemotherapy is safe, with the caveat patient selection for the treatment should be more discretionary. Chemo does seem to work for many, but there is a more ideal patient for this method and it shouldn’t be prescribed to every cancer patient that walks through the door. Professor David Cameron of the Edinburgh Cancer Centre at West General Hospital in Edinburgh, Scotland, noted, “The concern is that with some of the patients dying within 30 days of being given chemo probably shouldn’t have been given the chemo. But how many? There is no easy way to answer that, but perhaps looking at those places/hospitals where the death rate was higher might help. Furthermore, if we give less chemo then some patients will die because they didn’t get enough chemo. It’s a fine balance and the more data we have the better we can be at making sure we get the balance right. “ Poster Comment: Cancer killed both of my sisters before they were 60. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
#9. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Rife machine, Ozonated water, Colloidal silver. THats what I used to help people beat cancer.
One day would you please spell out your protocol for us, and for us to share with others? Did you have a good success rate? And btw, did you ever use it with glioblastoma and/or pancreatic cancer, two of the most lethal cancers out there? My brother did the slash, burn, poison. I think the surgery may have been warranted; however, I think the chemo and radiation were extremely detrimental. He put all his faith in the industry, very sorry to say. Thank you in advance.
Thank you in advance. MY success rate was around 50% Given that most everyone I worked with was told to make their final arrangements I consider that pretty damn good. I used 30ppm colloidal silver in a throat spray. That first. THen I would rife them by the numbers in the user guide book that came along with my particular brand of Rife machine (Global wellness now discontinued) . After that I would insist that they drink a minimum of 8oz of freshly ozonated water. And that was it. I would administer this once or twice a week depending on circumstances for around 6 to 8 weeks. Some lived and some died... I did it for those I could help.
That is indeed amazing! For any end-stage cancer! But are you confirming 50% for glioblastoma and pancreatic cancer?? That would be BEYOND amazing! That would be astounding! Do you have a brand for the silver or do you make your own? Thank you titorite. I am saving this. Because there is bound to be a "next time".
There are no replies to Comment # 17. End Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||