[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
World News See other World News Articles Title: Time to End Foreign Aid to Israel (and Everyone Else) Given the recent shooting of unarmed Palestinian protestors at the hands of Israeli soldiers, leaving 58 people killed and 2,700 injured, isn’t it time for the American people to be asking the following question about the role of the federal government in the lives of the American people: Why should any American be forced to subsidize the salaries of the Israeli soldiers who did the shooting and the rifles and bullets they used in the massacre? I am referring, of course, to “foreign aid,” the federal program by which American citizens are forced to fund foreign regimes that many would choose not to fund if they had a choice. Even those who support the deadly mayhem in Gaza nonetheless would be hard-pressed to explain why anyone should be forced to fund something that violates his own conscience. In a genuinely free society (as compared to an unfree society that only purports to be free), people keep their own money and decide what they wish to do with it. Some donate to this cause, others donate to that cause, and some don’t make any donations at all. That was one of the basic principles of freedom on which the United States was founded. Our American ancestors decided that this would be a society in which there would be no income taxation or IRS. Thus, for more than 100 years, the American people were free to keep everything they earned. By the same token, no one was forced to share his income with others. In other words, no mandatory charity. That’s because our American ancestors believed that no one should be forced to be good and caring. If donations were to occur, they would have to come voluntarily and willingly from the income that people were free to keep. At the risk of belaboring the obvious, the society that America’s founders brought into existence was the most unusual in history, especially given such other features as no Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, farm subsidies, welfare, public schooling, drug laws, immigration controls, Federal Reserve, paper money, minimum-wage laws, price controls, massive standing army, military-industrial complex, CIA, NSA, FBI, entangling alliances, foreign wars, foreign interventions, and other welfare-warfare departments, agencies, and programs that characterize the type of system that Americans (and everyone else in the world) live under today. Moreover, no foreign aidI Let’s break down foreign aid to its essentials in order to clearly comprehend why it is so reprehensible. Unlike the first century of Americans, Americans have lived under a federal income tax since 1913, just as most people around the world do. The law requires them to send a certain portion of their income to the U.S. Treasury. If they refuse to do so, they are met with the full totalitarian-like powers of the Internal Revenue Service, including liens, garnishments, attachments, audits, harassment, arrest, indictment, prosecution, conviction, incarceration, and fine. Thus, the myth that some U.S. officials have promoted over the years that the income tax is voluntary is just that — a myth, actually a lie. It’s not voluntary because if any individual decides against paying the tax, the feds, especially the IRS, do very bad things to him. That’s not voluntarism. That’s coercion in its purest form. The U.S. government then uses a portion of those seized monies to send money or armaments to the Israeli government. We call it “foreign aid” but in actuality it is nothing more than government-to-government welfare. The Israeli government then uses the “foreign aid” to underwrite its programs and operations against the Palestinians. U.S. officials and Israeli officials maintain that U.S. foreign aid to Israel is justified because the Israelis, they say, are in the right in their long-standing dispute with the Palestinians. But why shouldn’t each American be free to make that call for himself? Why should a person who disagrees with that assessment be forced to fund something that violates his conscience? Why shouldn’t Americans be free to decide whether to send money to Israel, just as they are free to say “no” to the grocery-store clerk who asks if they wish to contribute a dollar to “support the troops”? Don’t forget: voluntary charity was one of the basic principles of freedom on which our nation was founded. Indeed, today there are many Americans who send donations to the Israeli state and to private groups within Israel. There are regular fundraising drives in synagogues and by other private groups across America that raise money for both the Israeli government and private Israeli groups. No one forces anyone to donate. It’s all voluntary. That’s the way it should be. By forcing everyone to fund the Israeli government, including its actions against the Palestinians, foreign aid clearly violates that fundamental principle of freedom. Everyone, including people who would ordinarily say “no,” is being forced to fund something whether he wants to or not. Of course, it’s not just Israel. Consider Egypt, which is governed by one of the most brutal, unelected military dictatorships in history, one that long considered itself to be an enemy of the Israeli state. The U.S. government sends foreign aid to Egypt in the form of money and armaments, which Egyptian officials use to maintain their brutal tyranny against the Egyptian people. Why should any American be forced to fund the Egyptian tyrants, especially Americans who oppose tyranny? Why shouldn’t Americans be free to decide for themselves who to donate to and who not to donate to? Foreign aid is really nothing more than a crooked, corrupt racket that the U.S. government operates as a way to control foreign regimes. The idea is to place foreign regimes on the U.S. government’s welfare dole as a way of making them dependent on the dole. It has never had anything to do with any concern for the welfare of foreigners. It has always been about control. Once a foreign regime goes on the foreign-policy dole, it will be much more likely be compliant, submissive, and agreeable to the dole-giver owing to fear of losing its dole. This realpolitik was made clear just last March by John Bolton, who now serves as President Trump’s national security advisor. In an article in the Chicago Tribune, Bolton is quoted as saying, “I’ve been of the view that votes in the United Nations should cost people, cost countries that vote against us.” To confirm his point, Bolton pointed out that back in 1990, Yemeni officials voted in the UN against U.S. intervention against Saddam Hussein, who had previously been a partner and ally of the U.S. government. Bolton recalled, approvingly, that U.S. Secretary of State James Baker told the Yemenis that it would prove to be the most expensive vote they ever cast. Bolton pointed out, “And we did cut their foreign aid. And there needs to be more of that.” Moreover, in a time when the U.S. government’s debt, which hangs over the American people like the sword of Damocles, now exceeds $21 trillion and when the government continues adding almost a trillion dollars a year to that debt, shouldn’t Americans be demanding a reduction in federal spending before U.S. officials drive us all into bankruptcy? What better place to start than by ending all U.S. foreign aid, not only to Israel, but also to every other regime in the world? Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Ada (#0)
Stop giving money to other countries and spend it in the US of A on roads, homeless, bridges and a thousands other great reason.
They can't do anything logical. Since WW1 they've had the sheeple hooked on crazy BS, and convinced it's strawberry shortcake.
_____________________________________________________________ USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um
Since our leaders prefer an empire, money must be spent abroad on our satraps. When the USSR was an empire, its satellites had a much better standard of living than Russia itself.
So the USSR took Russians' money and spent it on the satellites? Or (seems likelier) did those countries have better living standards to begin with. The USSR was once dubbed "Upper Volta with rockets".
_____________________________________________________________ USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||