[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Science/Tech See other Science/Tech Articles Title: Anti-gravity Bundy☭ Yea star wars was so real.. Yet they have to buy Russian rocket engines for even launching their satellites when they have anti gravity drives. Pacificnorthwest Please give that tired meme, a rest. The Merlin rocket engine, conceived, designed, and manufactured in the USA by SpaceX, is one of the best rocket engines ever made period! It is launching and has already luanched numerous satelites into space, including into GEO orbits. The Raptor and also the Blue Origin BE-4 engines are also state of the art rocket engines that are nearing readiness, after many years of development. SpaceX is recovering and re-using its booster rockets, powered by a cluster of 9 Merlin engines. Who else is doing that? The MIC owned crony-capitalism portion of the US space sector utilizes the RD-80 rocket engines you refer to, and by the way which are fine engines, but SpaceX manufactures its own rocket engines, and they are fine engines as well. The Merlin engine, and by a significant margin too has the best thrust to weight ratio of any large rocket engine ever made, anywhere! There are some smart people in America… a lot of dumbasses for sure, but some smart engineers and scientists actually do happen to be born in North America. Star Wars and related programs were covers for astronomically large scale fraud and outright theft… and to as cover funding for other unknown black programs. Bundy☭ NASA uses Russian planes to generate anti gravity in the atmosphere. Its how they train for ISS and such. I think you mean electronic anti grav which is not possible. As it would require too much power. Remember the higgs boson that gives mass to particles? Without which there is no gravity as mass is what generates gravity. If the US or anyone else had such technology they would not hide it. Its such a leap in technology that the chance to take over the world and everything in it would be just too tempting. Farty Beans I know of two pathways followed for anti-gravity (not relative zero-gravity as is obtained in a plane at free fall), both are related to magnetism. The one I was referring to is based on plasma that is moving through a magnetic field. It is thus more suitable to use in the atmosphere or under low gravity conditions. I was told by indirect source this would or could work. The other pathway I only saw on the internet. It involves a static magnetic field. I’m not sure how it is supposed to work unless the magnetic field is very strong. I suppose this is what you call electr(on)ic anti grav. Bundy☭ You mean maglev? How would you go about it?? It only works with magnets and the earths magnetism is not strong enough. Farty Beans Ok I got it now, anti-gravity was known to me as non-gravity, the reduction of gravitation as may supposedly happen in the presence of anti-matter. I was not exactly referring to maglev, which works on a well-established physical principle, namely the repulsion force between two magnets of equal sign, but the reduction of the gavity field as it interacts directly with a static magnetic field. This is a principle that is far from established in physics but the guy I saw on the internet (can’t find him any longer) claimed he could do it in a simple home-lab, quite the same like the two profs that claimed to have discovered cold fusion two decades ago. It is discussed here, without much that actually makes sense, as always: www.researchgate.net/post..._an_electromagnetic_field Bundy☭ What I am saying is, for something to be possible, something else have to give. Like scram jet engines were known for 50 years. The problem was they had no thrust. They had nuclear propulsion also for 50 years and again the problem of no thrust and also dropping isotopes all over the place and giving everyone 3 eyes and such. There might be tricks to do things but the question is, is it feasible and usable in an environment. Alexander Burinskii Russian Academy of Sciences In my paper:( A.~Burinskii, The Dirac-Kerr-Newman electron, Grav. Cosmol. 14 (2008) 109, [arXiv:hep-th/0507109 v.4) was considered wonderrful thing that the Dirac equation may be implemented as a master equation in the Kerr-Schild fomalizm for the rotating black hole solutions. Since Dirac equation is controlled by the EM field, there appears the possibility of control also the gravitational objects. The details of the corresponding modification of the Kerr-Schild formalizm are now under consideration and I expect to publish it . Farty Beans I have not read the publication of Mr Burinskij. But I understand he tries to establish the principle formally. The guy I saw on the internet claimed to obtain a reduction of the gravity field with his home lab of the order of a few percent. So that would mean it is technically feasible. So that would be a rumoured technique based a non-established principle. Actually I think you refer to MHD. The problem with MHD, which is based on a well-known principle, seems to have been that the effect was too feable and the device was to large to be used to levitate an object in the atmosphere. So that was the problem of the existing and well-established technique but not ready. It seems to me now Russia got MHD to work. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
This is way above my pay-grade.
There are no replies to Comment # 1. End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||