[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children

Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort?

Israelis Persecute Americans

Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them

Ghost Dancers and Democracy: Tucker Carlson

Amalek (Enemies of Israel) 100,000 Views on Bitchute

ICE agents pull screaming illegal immigrant influencer from car after resisting arrest

Aaron Lewis on Being Blacklisted & Why Record Labels Promote Terrible Music

Connecticut Democratic Party Holds Presser To Cry About Libs of TikTok

Trump wants concealed carry in DC.

Chinese 108m Steel Bridge Collapses in 3s, 16 Workers Fall 130m into Yellow River

COVID-19 mRNA-Induced TURBO CANCERS.

Think Tank Urges Dems To Drop These 45 Terms That Turn Off Normies

Man attempts to carjack a New Yorker

Test post re: IRS

How Managers Are Using AI To Hire And Fire People

Israel's Biggest US Donor Now Owns CBS

14 Million Illegals Entered US in 2023: The Cost to Our Nation

American Taxpayers to Cover $3.5 Billion Pentagon Bill for U.S. Munitions Used Defending Israel

The Great Jonny Quest Documentary

This story About IRS Abuse Did Not Post

CDC Data Exposes Surge in Deaths Among Children of Covid-Vaxxed Mothers

This Interview in Munich in 1992 with Gudrun Himmler. (Heinrich Himmler's daughter)

25 STRANGE Wild West Home Features You’ll Never See Again

Zionists DEMAND Megyn Kelly's Head!

Cash Jordan: Migrant Mob THREATENS Judge... ICE 'Instantly Deports' Courthouse of Illegals


Pious Perverts
See other Pious Perverts Articles

Title: Should Brer' Be Banned?
Source: Self
URL Source: http://None
Published: Mar 15, 2006
Author: Self
Post Date: 2006-03-15 01:28:44 by Anonymous Dead Indian
Keywords: Banned?, Should, Brer
Views: 2069
Comments: 56

Brer' has been less than honest in his dealings with the people on this forum.

He has falsely attributed quotes, feelings and beliefs to people and then attacked people for for the stawmen that he himself hung on them.

He has mischaracterized material posted by others and then attacked the poster on the basis of this strawman.

In addition, he lacks basic social skills. He seems incapable of participating in rational discussion without resorting to sneers and other nasty tactics. As far as I can see, there has been almost no rational debate out of the guy. As I noted on a thread this evening, he contributes nothing and causes problems.

Should Brer' be tossed out on his butt or should he stay as the troll punching bag for the site?

All input will be appreciated.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 38.

#24. To: Anonymous Dead Indian (#0)

Of course he shouldn't be banned. Its best to let people say what is on their mind. More freedom is better not less.

A K A Stone  posted on  2006-03-15   7:17:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: A K A Stone, Zipporah (#24)

Of course he shouldn't be banned. Its best to let people say what is on their mind. More freedom is better not less.

As long as his call to violence and hateful racist statments are not left unchallenged then i agree that more freedom is good. I completely ignore Brer' but i do worry that if his statements are not countered (there is no point in arguing with him because he lacks the mental ability to process info that he doesn't agree with)then he could taint this forum with his racism/calls to violence and general idiocy and we'd all look somewhat guilty by association.

I wouldn't want Brer' or anyone else banned because their ideas are unpopular or even repugnant, but with Brer' it seems he doesn't really engage in dialogue or defend his views, he just rants and i don't think this forum should be a one-way soap box for especially repugnant views, esp those that call for violent action against what Brer' considers his enemies.

It's a fine line and a hard call, but i have confidence in Zip and Christine to do the right thing. And in any case, i will continue to ignore him.

fatidic  posted on  2006-03-15   8:19:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: fatidic (#27)

(there is no point in arguing with him because he lacks the mental ability to process info that he doesn't agree with)

Cognitive dissonance is a frequent affliction among the bots.

Maybe I missed some of this, but you all seem to tolerate me to a point and I'm no angel either.

It depends what kind of violence you are calling for I suppose. With me, I have a very hard time with insolent, disobedient public servants. I think when one of them gets out of line they should be beaten and whipped soundly to put them back in their places. THEY ARE TO SERVE WE, THE PEOPLE, AND NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND.

Of course, these lying, conniving, plundering pirates and the puppet political prostitutes who are supposed to administrate, oversee and correct their actions and fail to do so are nothing more than traitors in my book.

BTW, we need more rope!

BTP Holdings  posted on  2006-03-15   10:00:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: BTP Holdings, Brer' (#30)

It's too early in the morning for me to try a logical explanation of the difference between posters like Brer' and the other types who express controversial ideas, obnoxiously or other wise, but here is my feeble attempt.

I have no problem with a vigorous debate that gets heated and even out of bounds when the debators are actually engaged in their own defending, attacking, rationalizing and otherwise standing up for what they believe, regardless of how much i dislike what they say. But i have not seen this in Brer' who, based on my limited exposure to his posts (enough to make me want to avoid him entirely), he just throws out stuff and then doesn't defend it or explain it or acknowledge any challenge to it but instead goes after the poster personally. It's as though he is not even interested in what he says but just posts empty words which zig and zag all over the place.

BTP, whatever you say i sense sincerty and civility and you should not think any of us confuse you with Brer' who is your opposite. No worries, BTP. I like a free-for-all where the posters are real people, with real convictions, and ears to listen to others, and a brain to process what they hear. Brer' seems to lack all these qualities, poor boy/girl/it. I'm sure we all make each other mad at times, but we're still a sort of family on 4um that naturally argues an triangulates and falls out and then kisses and makes up, etc. Brer' may even show us that he has a kinder, rational, interesting side who would rather be posting here than on FR .

So the question for Brer' is does he/she/it want to be a part of this family or does he want to destroy it along with many other countries and his perceived enemies? I'd like to give him another chance if he can take the criticism and be a good sport about it and not threaten to blow us up too.

fatidic  posted on  2006-03-15   10:42:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 38.

        There are no replies to Comment # 38.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 38.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]