[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Immigration See other Immigration Articles Title: Austerity And Mass Migration Why did Britain vote Yes in the Brexit vote Cameron called? To a large degree to protest policies he himself imposed. For many its still a mystery mechanism, but not for all. People like Steve Bannon understand it very well. That is, austerity and mass migration make voters turn to the political right. Even if they are initiated by the right. When Britains Tories under David Cameron and George Osborne began ripping apart much of the countrys institutions and infrastructure, they knew that their austerity measures would only make their party stronger. The incompetence of Theresa May and her ministers on Brexit will lead to an almighty backlash, and soon, but then Boris Johnson or Jacob Rees-Mogg, far to the right of May, will take over. Labour under Corbyn doesnt stand a chance. The same pattern repeats itself everywhere, and nobody knows how to stop it. How could they if and when they dont understand it? For the right, this is a cant lose, and theyre not done. Thats why Steve Bannon is touring Europe. Its easy pickings: a rightwing government that imposes austerity measures will be rewarded for it with more voters. If it also lets in large numbers of migrants, even more votes. Cant lose. The migration streams in Europe are supported by the right, because they know that subsequently opposing them will keep them in power. Under political systems as we once knew them, youd expect people to turn left instead of right, but there is no left left to vote for. Whats left of what was once left, has become an indistinguishable part of a big shapeless blob in the center -or even center-right- of our political systems. Or perhaps we should say: the systems as we once knew them. And its indeed just whats left of the left, which in most cases is very little. In many countries, the UK, Netherlands, Germany, France, Italy, formerly left parties have been all but extinguished, former glory brought to its knees. Spain is an exception, but leftwing PM Pablo Sanchez seems to have landed his job primarily by playing a better game of chess -or poker- than his opponents when he forced then-PM Mariano Rajoy out. But just wait till you see what happens when refugees and migrants begin flooding into Spain, instead of Greece and Italy, for real. That development has already started. Italy closed its borders, Spain opened them. It will lead to a rightwing government in Madrid, too. This is not about opinion. its simply what happens. When there is no left to turn to to halt austerity, let alone temper migration numbers, people will turn to the only alternative available to them. Right. The same right that is more than ready to magnify the problems, whether its migration or increasing levels of poverty. They win either way. In Germany, the leftwing SDP hardly exists anymore. Center-right Angela Merkel, Queen of Europe, opened the doors of the nation and whaddaya know, parties to her right started growing. If I can insert one bit of opinion here, Id say letting one million migrants into your country in one year is asking for trouble. Migration must always take place in moderation, especially when the difference in wealth between an existing population and new arrivals is very large. Its different in Turkey or Lebanon, where wealth disparities are much smaller. And those countries are already largely Muslim, whereas allowing many people into your country who have completely different religions and worldviews is a whole different game. Canada does this -relatively- well: new arrivals are Canadian first, and Muslim or Syrian after. European countries have never mastered that model; thats why they have ghettos and assorted other problems. Migration and assimilation must be two sides of the same coin, or you have not immigration but an invasion. The right can do what it wants and still win and get bigger, while privatizing everything in sight and robbing the public of all they once owed. And then that same public will vote for them again. Its neoliberal and neocon and theres nobody left to explain, let alone fight it. And if there were, theres a formidable propaganda machine waiting in the wings, and theyve been at it for a while now. The -formerly- left has no such machine. The best they can do is blame Russia. But they themselves are to blame, not Moscow. So the people vote against their own best interests, and its not even very hard to get them to do that anymore. All you need to do is deprive them of all other options. Once the left wing becomes part of the center, whether its in the US or any of many European countries, rien ne va plus. The die has been cast. The left must turn against neoliberalism, but it has no economists to explain the reason why, and no leaders who understand economics. So they have become neoliberalists themselves. Theyre all stuck in the austerity model, and nobody gets how damaging it is to take a meat cleaver to an already suffering economy. The people of Greece can explain that one. Economies function -or not- because of money flowing through them. You can cut away some of the fat in lean times, but you cant cut away the arteries. Austerity is deadly to an economy, but the irony is that it makes people vote for those who first, initiate it, and second, promote more austerity. I dont want to insert any political opinions, but I do think that for a society, and an economy, to properly function there needs to be a balance, between left and right, between rich and poor, between owners and workers. Were far away from any such balance wherever I look. And as Ive said before, thats why we have Trump. To reveal what has so far remained hidden: everything done under the guise of left that was merely more neoliberalism. To allow people who dont agree with him to form an opinion and an identity, something they thought was not necessary under neoliberals like Obama or Tony Blair or Merkel. I dont see any of that happening though, and that means many more years of Trump and other rightwing dominance. If the answer to austerity is to vote for more austerity, what will be the answer to collapsing stock- and housing markets? I have an idea. And it doesnt include Jeremy Corbyn. Or Bernie Sanders. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|