See other World News Articles
Title: South Africa Calls for 300,000 Gun Owners to Turn Over Their Weapons
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://gunpowdermagazine.com/south ... rs-to-turn-over-their-weapons/
Published: Aug 17, 2018
Author: José Niño
Post Date: 2018-08-17 21:57:34 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 92
Comments: 9
South Africa Calls for 300,000 Gun Owners to Turn Over Their Weapons By: José Niño 8-17-2018 South Africa is opening the door for tyranny. The Constitutional Court of South Africa recently ruled that 300,000 gun owners must turn in their firearms. This judgement came in response to the North Gauteng High Court’s ruling in 2017 which said Section 24 and Section 28 of the Firearm’s Control Act were unconstitutional. A report from The Citizen explains what Section 24 and Section 28 entail: “Section 24 of the Act requires that any person who seeks to renew a licence must do so 90 days before its expiry date Section 28 stipulates that if a firearm licence has been cancelled‚ the firearm must be disposed of or forfeited to the state. A 60-day time frame was placed on its disposal, which was to be done through a dealer.” Now that the High Court’s initial ruling has been overturned, gun owners who failed to renew their firearms licenses must hand in their firearms to the nearest police station, where authorities will then proceed to destroy them. Many naïve political observers will paint this event as a casual gun control scheme, but any astute student of politics will recognize that the floodgates are now open for further encroachments – not only on the gun rights of South Africans, but also on others facets of theirs lives. A look at South Africa’s current political climate will give us an idea of the potential ramifications of this gun control scheme. Political Trouble Brewing in South Africa? Though South Africa witnessed rising levels of economic freedom shortly after Apartheid ended in 1994, the country has taken a more interventionist path to economic development in recent years. This situation is becoming more pronounced with the South African National Assembly recently voting 241-83 to amend the South African constitution to allow for land expropriation without compensation. The socialist-leaning African National Congress (ANC) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) parties are leading the charge for expropriation under the banner of fixing racial disparities that have supposedly remained intact since Apartheid’s conclusion. While land confiscation has not been officially finalized, South Africans should worry about the direction their country is going. And how does gun control fit into this equation? Gun Control: A Tool for Tyranny No matter how socialist apologists rationalize it, the redistributionist agenda the South African government is pursuing will not be implemented passively. Ultimately, it must be carried out by force. The kind of force socialists seek is a monopolized kind, which extreme forms of gun control like gun confiscation help facilitate. The history of gun confiscation is one of repeated cases of tyranny. From countries such as Cuba to the Soviet Union, aspiring demagogues have used gun confiscation to disarm the populace. Logically, an unarmed populace will put up little resistance against their tyrannical acts. In South Africa’s case, farmers and their workers are already suffering ongoing attacks against their property. One could only imagine what it would be like for these persecuted farmers once they are stripped of their right to self-defense. For many Americans who have enjoyed historically unprecedented gun rights, South Africa’s gun control experience may seem distant and strange. But make no mistake about it, South Africa’s latest flirtation with gun control is not based on good intentions, especially when considering the political climate the country is enduring. South Africa should serve as a fair warning to Americans of the dangerous consequences gun control poses. Poster Comment: Gun control is the hallmark of tyranny.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Sounds like a good plan to me. After all,the saintly blacks are in charge there,so what could possibly go wrong?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
What WON'T go wrong. See: Rhodesia/Zimbabwe Those Bantu's will fuck up a freshly caught catfish and turn it into the incubator of an Ebola plague “With the exception of Whites, the rule among the peoples of the world, whether residing in their homelands or settled in Western democracies, is ethnocentrism and moral particularism: they stick together and good means what is good for their ethnic group." Whitey better wake up because other honkies on other CONTINENTS are being murdered, having their land taken, and their killers are being protected by the official governments where they live. Here in the USSA whitey is being vilified by the media and in many instances self hating whites are accepting a guilt complex about something that happened generations ago. The U.S. FEDERAL (RESERVE BANK OWNED) GOVERNMENT is public enemy #1. Ephesians 5:11King James Version (KJV) 11 "And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. " It's not terrorism when Amerika does it.
The government and the banksters work hand in glove to rob the people of their wealth, both by inflation and the collection of unlawful income taxes. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
I remember way back when: the UN, the US, the EU all hailed the take over of SF by the blacks, they gave money and total support. It was wonderful, it was great. Here is where I put my foot into it: every time blacks are in charge, no matter where, it all turns to total DREN. Best part the MSM and Fox are not talking about the murder of white people in SF
Nelson Mandela and the ANC were fronts for the Communists. And what was one of the first thing the Bolsheviks did after they took control of Russia? They banned the private ownership of firearms. Government monopoly of arms is the first step in a long chain of tyrannical suppression. Remember why the British marched on Lexington and Concord. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
No,they were actual communists,and bragged about it. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
As Josey Wales said, "I reckon so." ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
When whites arrived and brought modern medicine and farming techniques it caused the black population to soar. Now that the blacks are in charge everything is going in reverse. Life in South Africa can only get worse as 150 Boer farmers (and their families) have taken up Putin on his offer of free land to anyone who wishes to emigrate there. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
#2. To: sneakypete (#1)
what could possibly go wrong?
-Alex Kurtagic 
#3. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
#4. To: noone222 (#3)
The U.S. FEDERAL (RESERVE BANK OWNED) GOVERNMENT is public enemy #1.
#5. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
#6. To: X-15, sneakypete (#2)
what could possibly go wrong? What WON'T go wrong
#7. To: BTP Holdings (#6)
Nelson Mandela and the ANC were fronts for the Communists.
#8. To: sneakypete (#7)
they were actual communists,and bragged about it.
#9. To: sneakypete (#1)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest