[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination

How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: The Self-Defense Cases: How the United States Supreme Court Confronted a Hanging Judge in the Nineteenth Century and Taught Some Lessons for Jurisprudence in the Twenty-First
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.davekopel.com/2A/LawRev/Self-Defense-Cases.htm
Published: Aug 15, 2018
Author: David B. Kopel
Post Date: 2018-09-03 17:31:08 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 97

The Self-Defense Cases:

How the United States Supreme Court Confronted a Hanging Judge in the Nineteenth Century and Taught Some Lessons for Jurisprudence in the Twenty-First

David B. Kopel [FNa1]

27 American Journal of Criminal Law 293 (2000). More by Kopel on the Second Amendment in the 19th century.

293

Copyright (c) 2000 University of Texas School of Law; David B. Kopel

Table of Contents
I. Introduction ........................................................ 294
II. Jurisdiction and Background ......................................... 296
III. The Cases ........................................................... 296
A. Gourko v. United States: Carrying a Gun is an Innocent Act ..... 296
B. Starr v. United States: Even Criminals May Use Deadly Force in Resisting Attacks by Law Enforcement Officers ..................... 296
C. Thompson v. United States: There is Nothing Wrong with Carrying a Rifle for Protection ............................................ 296
D. Beard v. United States: There is No Duty to Retreat Before Using Deadly Force ................................................ 296
E. Allison v. United States: Self-Defense is for Juries to Evaluate, Not for Judges to Exclude ............................... 296
F. Wallace v. United States: Prior Threats by an Attacker are Relevant to a Defendant's Use of Deadly Force ..................... 296
G. Alberty v. United States: No Duty to Retreat when Confronting a Spouse's Paramour ................................................. 296
H. Acers v. United States: Judge Parker is Affirmed ............... 296
I. Allen v. United States: Self-Defense Decisions Can be Made in a Hurry; There is a Duty to Retreat on Public Property .............. 296
J. Rowe v. United States: Withdrawal from a Fight Revives the Right to Self-Defense ............................................. 296
K. Brown v. United States: Detached Reflection Cannot be Demanded in the Presence of an Uplifted Knife .............................. 296
IV. The Significance of the Self-Defense Cases .......................... 296
A. Judge Parker Fires Back ........................................ 296
B. What Made the Defendants in the Self-Defense Cases so Sympathetic to the Supreme Court? ................................. 296
C. Do the Self-Defense Cases Have Any Modern Application? ......... 296

*294

I. Introduction
From 1893 to 1896, the United States Supreme Court handed down a series of decisions involving self-defense and the carrying and use of firearms for self- defense. These cases laid the foundation for a 1921 opinion, authored by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, that became the most important armed self- defense case in American legal history, upholding and extending the right to armed self-defense. In these Self-Defense Cases, the Supreme Court fought out a bitter confrontation with Federal District Judge Isaac Parker, the presiding judge in all but one of the cases, and a judge who is much admired today by Chief Justice William Rehnquist. [FN1]

Until the 1960s, the 1893-96 period was the Supreme Court's greatest period of activism against capital sentences. The Self-Defense Cases raise the issues that are still important as our judiciary enters the Twenty-First Century: accusations that appellate judges who reverse capital convictions are "soft on crime" and use "technicalities" to mask their personal opposition to the death penalty, the limits of how far appellate judges can go in restraining a zealous trial judge, whether ethnic minorities or uneducated people can receive a fair trial or a fair appeal, and the scope of the right to use deadly force for protection. An additional issue is whether *295 narrowing the right of self-defense is an advance for civilization or an assault on civil liberty. As we wrestle with all of these issues today, it would be wise for us to study how an earlier generation of judges dealt with these questions.

Today, the Supreme Court of 1893-96 is remembered principally for their unprincipled political decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, [FN2] which claimed that state-imposed racial segregation was not intended to be insulting to blacks. [FN3] It may be startling then, to modern readers, to discover a string of cases in which the Court stood up again and again for the rights of blacks, American Indians, and other outsiders. What made the Court so energetic in its desire to vindicate the rights of certain criminal defendants? Do the Court's decisions from that era offer any guidance for modern judges who confront issues in capital cases very similar to what the 1893-96 Court faced?

The Self-Defense Cases have received almost no scholarly attention, even from specialists in the Supreme Court's historical treatment of death penalty or criminal law. Chief Justice Rehnquist's tribute essay on Judge Parker criticizes the Supreme Court for reversing Parker so often on "legal technicalities," [FN4] but the essay does not address the particular issues in the Self-Defense Cases. The most recent biographies of Chief Justice Fuller [FN5] and Justice Harlan [FN6] ignore the cases, while an earlier Harlan biography devotes only two pages to all of the Court's criminal law work for this period. [FN7] A biography of Justice David Brewer provides a similarly brusque treatment, [FN8] and none of the biographies examine the Self-Defense Cases apart from the rest of the Court's criminal jurisprudence. This article aims to bring some needed attention to the Self-Defense Cases, and to use them to develop some lessons for modern jurisprudence.

Part II of this article details the jurisdictional developments that, for the first time in the Supreme Court's history, suddenly forced the justices to begin reviewing ordinary capital convictions. Part III examines each of the Self-Defense Cases from the 1890s, in turn, as well as a 1921 case, Brown v. United States, [FN9] that resolved one issue on which the Self-Defense Cases had created some ambiguity. Responding to Chief Justice Rehnquist's article praising Judge Parker, Part IV offers some suggestions for what the Self- Defense Cases teach about good judging and about how to think about judges.

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

Lots of good info further along here for those of you who have a knack for legal issues.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  



[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]