[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

List Of 18 Things That Are Going To Happen Within The Next 40 Days Pentagon Taps 600 Military Lawyers To Serve As Temporary Immigration Judges For DOJ 81 Actors Who Have Passed Away So Far in 2025 High school is different now Banks REMOVING CASH and nearing major DISASTER. Prof St Onge. Did America Pick the Wrong Side in WWII? Chicago in CHAOS – Mayor Tells Police to Stand Down as Trump Says ENOUGH Murder Graham Linehan ARRESTED in UK for gender critical tweets - UK COLLAPSE IS IMMINENT Cash Jordan: 400,000 Illegals ‘Forcibly Returned’ To Mexico… as NYC COLLAPSES The ChatGPT CEO's Web Of Lies by Vanessa Wingardh The Fall of the Israel Lobby Has Begun — And This Is Just the Start | Denzel Washington speech 'Statistically Almost Impossible' – 4 AfD Candidates Have Died 'Suddenly And Unexpectedly' Before Key State Election Israel And The West Set The Stage For Next Round Of Warfare On Iran Last night in Milan, an 18-year-old girl was beaten and raped while trying to catch a train home Russia has developed a truly modern system of warfare. Alberta's Independence and Finances Daniela Cambone: 100% Loan Losses Loom as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet- Tucker Carlson Cash Jordan: ICE HALTS 'Invasion Convoy'... ESCORTS 'Armada' of Illegals BACK to MEXICO Cash Jordan: “We’re Coming In"... Migrant Mob ENTERS ICE HQ, Get ERASED By 'Deportation Unit' Opioids More Likely To Kill Than Car Crashes Or Suicide The association between COVID-19 “vaccines” and cognitive decline Democrats Sink to Near Zero in New Gallup Poll, Theyre Just Not Satisfied She Couldn't Read Her Own Diploma: Why Public Schools Pass Students but Fail Society Peter Schiff: Gold To $6,000 Next Year, Dollar Index To 70 Russia Just Admitted Exactly What Everyone – But Trump – Already Knew About Putin's Ukraine Plans Sex Offenses in London by Nationality Greater Israel Collapses: Iran the Next Target Before Jeffrey Epstein: The FINDERS Cyprus: The Israeli Flood Has Become A Deluge

World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Russian Military: US Killed Dozens By Bioweapon Disguised As Drug Research
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018 ... weapon-disguised-drug-research
Published: Oct 6, 2018
Author: Tyler Durden
Post Date: 2018-10-06 01:13:19 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 31
Comments: 1

The Russian Defense Ministry is accusing the United States of killing dozens of Georgians with a biological weapon after disguising it as drug research. Documents recorded the deaths of 73 people over a short period of time, indicating a test of “a highly toxic chemical or biological agents with high lethality rate.”

According to RT, the question of what really might have taken place at the secretive United States-sponsored research facility hosted by Russia’s southern neighbor Georgia was raised by the Russian military on Thursday after they studied files published online by a former Georgian minister. Igor Kirillov, commander of the Russian military branch responsible for defending troops from radiological, chemical and biological weapons said that it was not drug research, but a chemical or biological weapon that killed the 73 Georgians.

The documents relating to the secret lab were published last month by former Georgian minister for state security Igor Giorgadze, who says he obtained 100,000 pages of data pointing to questionable US practices.

Kirillov has doubts that the tests, which were carried out by the Richard Lugar Center for Public Health Research near the Georgian capital Tbilisi and were said to involve clinical trials of a drug called Sovaldi, which is meant for the treatment of Hepatitis C, were actually done on the drug. The producer of the drug is Gilead Sciences, a California-based biomedical firm that recruited former US defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld as a board member in 1988, in between his two tenures as head of the Pentagon.

“The documents showed many lethal outcomes among the patients. Despite the deaths of 24 people in December 2015 alone, the clinical trials were continued in violation of international standards and the wishes of the patients,” Kirillov claimed according to a report by RT. “This led to the deaths of 49 more people.”

Pentagon spokesman Eric Pahon responded to Russia’s allegations, telling RIA Novosti that the US did not conduct bioweapons research in Georgia and called the Russian ministry’s statements part of “a Russian disinformation campaign directed against the West.”

Russia will take “diplomatic and military action” in response to a perceived threat from US labs, said Vladimir Shamanov, head of Russian parliament’s Defense Committee. He was commenting on accusations by the Defense Ministry. “We cannot simply turn a blind eye to things happening near our southern borders that directly affect our safety,” he told TASS news agency.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: Horse (#0) (Edited)

Add that to the list. We bomb Syria but the US govt has a long history of performing chemical attacks on ITS OWN PEOPLE, let alone other nations:

Human medical experimentation in the United States: The shocking true history of modern medicine and psychiatry (1833-1965)

https://www.naturalnews.com/z019189_human_medical_experimentation_ethics.html

Part II: Human medical experimentation in the United States: The shocking true history of modern medicine and psychiatry (1965-2005)

https://www.naturalnews.com/019187.html

Excerpt: GOVERNMENT ALLEGED TO HAVE USED MILITARY AND CIVILIAN POPULATIONS AS GUINEA PIGS GULF WAR SYNDROME -- TIP OF THE ICEBERG

"...Does Iraq's accusation, reported by ABC News, now seem quite as unrealistic, that "'America is likely to launch military strikes on these sites and others, using mass destruction weapons which contain chemical and biological elements, so that it can say, after the strikes, that its allegations were right,' an official spokesman told the Iraqi news agency INA. 'It is quite necessary to warn against such a wicked American conspiracy, which is confirmed by well-informed sources," the spokesman said.

Warn against "such a wicked American conspiracy"? How could they think such a thing? Does the Iraqi government know more than the American public?

YOU MEAN I DON'T HAVE TO JOIN THE MILITARY TO QUALIFY AS A GOVERNMENT GUINEA PIG?

That the United States Government has been performing secret medical experiments on its own citizens (civilian as well as military) without their permission or knowledge is not only an historically proven fact, known by many, but it is obvious that it is not confined to history. What most do not know is that U.S. law actually provides for the government's use of its own citizens as experimental test subjects without their permission or prior knowledge.

Federal law 50 USC 1520 entitled, "WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE, CHAPTER 32 - CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM" begins with the ominous, almost Mengelian prologue:

Use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents by Department of Defense; accounting to Congressional committees with respect to experiments and studies; notification of local civilian officials...

The only provision contained in the law for challenging such experiments is in the obliquely worded paragraph one of subsection 'b' which says:

The Secretary of Defense may not conduct any test or experiment involving the use of any chemical or biological agent on civilian populations unless local civilian officials in the area in which the test or experiment is to be conducted are notified in advance of such test or experiment...

This necessarily applies to peacetime civilian populations. There would be no permission asked, or granted, of a foreign government with which this nation were at war, for permission to experiment on their citizens.

and such test or experiment may then be conducted only after the expiration of the thirty-day period beginning on the date of such notification.

It should be noted that no definition exists within that law which defines who or what constitutes "local civilian officials". Under this wording compliance could be satisfied by the notification of an off-duty meter maid.

The reality of 50 USC 1520 is that it is, on the face of it, unconstitutional. The fourth article of amendment to the U.S. Constitution clearly states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons...shall not be violated."

The most prominent application of the federal law, with which most people are familiar, is the infamous Tuskegee Experiments. These were studies performed by the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) upon 412 black American citizens infected with syphilis, depriving them of a proven cure for the purpose of a 40-year study of the disease's effect--which, untreated, is nearly always death.

More recently has come to light experiments being performed, again on black people, by the United States government; this time outside the restrictions of U.S. law.

A September 18 article in the New York Times reveals that "...for the past two years, the United States has been conducting experiments on pregnant women infected with HIV in Africa, Thailand and the Dominican Republic, in which some women are given drugs that can prevent transmission of the deadly AIDS virus to their babies and some receive only dummy pills. (emphasis supplied).

"The study is so controversial," theTimes article continues, "that even some of the government's own scientists have questioned whether it is ethical."

In an editorial by Dr. Marcia Angell, executive editor for the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM ), Dr. Angell opens with a powerful argument against the ethics of these studies. "An essential ethical condition for a randomized clinical trial, comparing two treatments for a disease is that there be no good reason for thinking one is better than the other....If there is," says theJournal editorial, "...the investigators would be guilty of knowingly giving inferior treatment to some participants in the trial."

Angell goes on to quote the World Health Organization, who she identifies as being "widely regarded as providing the fundamental guiding principles of research involving human subjects."

"'In research on man,'" she excerpts from the WHO's Declaration of Helsinki, "'the interest of science and society should never take precedence over considerations related to the well-being of the subject,' and 'in any medical study, every patient -- including those of a control group, if any -- should be assured of the best proven diagnostic and therapeutic method.'" (ibid.)

Could it not be logically questioned why not conduct the research in this country which, outside of Africa and Haiti, has about the highest incidence of HIV infection in the world?

That question is forcefully answered by the director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, Dr. Arthur Caplan. "If you tried to do this study in the U.S.," Dr. Caplan said, "you would have to do it through a throng of demonstrators and a sea of reporters." (NYT, Sept. 18, 1997).

The research, using non-American black women, is founded on studies that show that women with HIV infections that are treated with the drugs under study are two-thirds less likely to pass the disease on to their unborn children. "But the drug regimen costs about $1,000 per mother, so public health officials want to know if there are less expensive ways to use AZT to achieve the same benefit." (ibid.). [Note the ubiquitous references to money as a motivational factor in human "compassion".]

prescription pills and prescription drugs

"Half the foreign women in the experiments receive AZT," says the Times article, "at varying levels that differ from the amounts used in the United States. The other half get the dummy, or placebo, pills."

The condemnation of this clinical act of God-playing lies in the fact that more than 1,000 children, critics say, will acquire the HIV infections of their mothers and, as a result, will die from AIDS -- which could have been prevented. (ibid).

Dr. Angell also makes a strong comparison of the AZT program to the syphilis study mentioned earlier. "A textbook example of unethical research is the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis. In that study... from 1932 to 1972, [the subjects] were followed and compared with 204 men free of the disease to determine the natural history of syphilis."

The Tuskegee studies were terminated in 1970, just two years shy of its 40- year goal, when public outcry erupted following news reports revealing their existence. By that time, it is estimated, nearly a quarter of the men involved had died of the disease.

"The only lament," Dr. Angell noted, "seemed to be that many of the subjects inadvertently received treatment by other doctors," thus denying the researchers the full benefit of observing the disease's ultimate expression in those individuals. Indeed, they had taken extraordinary precautions to prevent their test subjects from receiving treatment. In order to assure that this virile and violent disease went unchecked in USPHS's human guinea pigs, a comprehensive list of all participants was provided every agency, physician, every venereal disease treatment program with whom they might come in contact-- even draft boards."

It appears that the same ethic is being plied upon the Gulf War veterans by the Defense Department when they decreed that all vets suffering from GWS be treated only in VA hospitals, according to the American Gulf War Veterans Association. They have the choice to seek private treatment, but at their own expense, because the VA will not issue chits for such care as they have done under different instances. This makes the military a research scientist's dream- -the perfect, isolated, test population. They have engineered circumstances much the same as with the Tuskegee experiments, ensuring that there is little or no outside interference with their studies.

A BRIEF HISTORY

The case histories are numerous of involuntary, secret experiments being performed on American citizens by their government. As testimonial to the extreme likelihood that such violations of personal rights by this government will continue covertly, the following historical citations are presented: •The Green Run 2 - This experiment was carried out by the Atomic Energy Commission (now the Nuclear Regulatory Agency) in December, 1949 which expelled 28,000 curies of radioactive material into the atmosphere at Hanford, Washington to test the effects and their ability to detect foreign bomb-making production. This was knowingly done upwind from local residents whose health was secretly monitored to observe any effects the release might have- - apparently as a fringe benefit to researchers of the primary purpose of the release. These residents were not informed of the release--national security, of course.

To place in perspective the enormous quantity of radiation represented by 28,000 curies -- ONE curie, alone, is radiation equaling 22,200,000,000,000 (22.2 trillion) atomic disintegrations per minute. When that one curie is multiplied by the 28,000 ejected during the Green Run tests it becomes more than an incomprehensible amount of radiation.

•Plutonium Injection Studies 3 of the late 1940's and early 1950's. Case-in- point - a 53-year-old "colored male" as the report refers to him, named Ebb Cade who was hospitalized by an automobile accident. He was subsequently injected with plutonium for the purpose of testing its long-term effects, because he was, except for his injuries, in excellent physical condition, and would be expected to live for another twenty to thirty years. Mr. Cade died thirteen years later.

In the DOE's official report on the matter it is recorded that the army doctor who administered the injection, Dr. Joseph Howland, "told AEC investigators in 1974 that..."there was, he recalled, no consent from the patient. He acted, he testified, only after his objections were met with a written order to proceed from his superior, Dr. Friedell."

"I was only following orders"--Does this contain a slight echo of Nuremberg? •"...in Mr. Cade's case," the DOD document states, "the risk of a plutonium- induced cancer could not be ruled out." TRANSLATION: let's shoot the guy up and see if he gets cancer.

•The Department of Energy was thrown into a maelstrom of spin control in 1994 when an Albuquerque Tribune reporter revealed extensive radiation experiments over a number of years by DOD on individuals without their consent. "They included," the report stated, "235 babies in five states who were injected with radioactive iodine, 100 retarded Massachusetts children [deja vu Nuremberg again] who had been fed radioactive cereal, 800 pregnant Tennessee women who had been exposed to radioactive substances and eight people injected with various isotopes of strontium at the University of California Hospital at San Francisco."

On the last day of 1997 CNN and the Associated Press published a story claiming: "A group of former students who ate radioactive oatmeal [in the 1940's and 50's] as unwitting participants in a food experiment will share a $1.85 million settlement from Quaker Oats and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The Department of Energy's web site that addresses its "Human Subjects Research" program opens with the header, "PROTECTING HUMAN SUBJECTS". After what has been revealed of their past record of safeguarding the welfare of their experimentees, one might well be advised to forego their "protection". Perhaps their motto should read, "PROTECTING HUMAN SUBJECTS--if we must."

•WILLOWBROOK 4 - "[Through] 1972 Dr. Saul Krugman of New York University led a study team at the Willowbrook State School for the Retarded, on Staten Island, New York....[T]he residents of the school, [were] nearly all...profoundly mentally impaired children and adolescents....The Armed Forces Epidemiological Board...approved and funded the research, and the executive faculty of the New York University School of Medicine...approved the research. Krugman and his colleagues injected some of them with a mild form of hepatitis serum. The researchers justified their work on the grounds that the subjects probably would have become infected anyway." They had told the parents that the children would be given a vaccine when, in fact, none existed.

Most people believe that the concept of the American government performing harmful medical experiments on their own citizens is preposterous. That is precisely the approach taken by Senator John Glenn (D.Ohio) when he introduced Senate Bill S.193 in January of 1997. In his oral introduction of the bill to the Senate floor he began with a hypothetical scenario: experimental laboratory

"If I approached any Senator here and I said, 'You did not know it, but the last time they went to the doctor or went to the hospital, your wife or your husband or your daughter or your son became the subject of a medical experiment that they were not even told about. They were given medicine, they were given pills, they were given radiation, they were given something and were not even told about this, were not even informed about it, yet they are under some experimental research that might possibly do them harm--maybe some good will come out of it, but maybe it will do them harm also--but they do not know about it,' people would laugh at that and say that is ridiculous. That cannot possibly happen in this country. Yet, that very situation is what this piece of legislation is supposed to address."

Senator Glenn goes on to ask, rhetorically, "What law prohibits experimenting on people without their informed consent? What I found, when I looked into it," Glenn shares his surprise, "is there is no law on the books requiring that informed consent be obtained."

Glenn also stated instances of what he called, "sad examples of unethical research conducted in the United States...well after the Nuremberg Code was issued [and] adopted...."

The very first sentence of the ten articles of the Nuremberg Code, embraced after WWII in response to Nazi atrocities, states, "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential." The United States is a signatory of the Nuremberg Code, which apparently has become to this government the equivalent of its treaties with Native Americans, of which this nation has kept none.

Glenn's bill still sits in committee and has yet to be acted upon.

Dr. Marcia Angell, in her earlier quoted editorial, observes that, "There appears to be a general retreat from the clear principles enunciated in the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki as applied to research in the Third World. Why is that?" she asks, then presents, among her answers, "Clinical trials have become a big business [money, again]....To survive, it is necessary to get the work done as quickly as possible, with a minimum of obstacles. When these considerations prevail, it seems as if we have not come very far from Tuskegee after all."

Referring to the Gulf War incidents and the current practices taking place in Bosnia, a memo from the army's ethics committee chairman, Col. Arthur O. Anderson, also signed by the commander of the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Col. Earnest Takafuji, stated:

"'...the government had a moral duty to adhere to its principles, even in wartime, that nobody would be subjected to an experimental medication without consent.'"

"A 'military' justification for involuntary receipt of investigational products because of strategic, doctrine and discipline concerns resembles too closely the logic used by Nazi doctors to rationalize using humans in research that had predictably destructive outcomes." (Cleveland Plain Dealer, Dec. 21, 1997).

It is a profound and disturbing truth that government never relinquishes, voluntarily, any power it has enjoyed over its citizens. The idea that the governmental scientific community has done so by ceasing such experimentation is unrealistic at best--especially when there are laws on the books that permit such behavior--and especially when there exists overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The most likely direction is for them to continue as they have done, only with increasing power.

One of the principal indicators found in a society in severe moral declension which precedes its demise, is the manner in which it treats the elderly and mentally infirmed--in other words--those who have severely diminished capacity to help themselves. Such conditions were, of course, found in Nazi Germany which subjected certain classes of citizens to involuntary medical experiments.

As power is removed from each strata of society and migrates upward, those to whom it accrues tend to look upon those from whom they wrested it as subhuman primates or cattle with whom they may do as they wish. That wresting of power from the "least significant" of society began, in this country, with the Native Americans, after that the blacks and Hispanics and will continue its upward spiral until there are only two classes: the very rich and the "cattle" who support them.

Why, in this society that seems to be more informed than any other on the subject of human rights (it certainly thrusts it in the face of other nations quite forcefully), is this hypocrisy permitted? It is evident that the invisible, secret hand driving the new order are people who know, by arduous observation of human nature and socio-cultural analysis, exactly how far they can push the limits of American tolerance. They have had their fingers on the apathetic moral pulse of this country for over 200 years and there is virtually nothing that they have not anticipated--except--intervention by Omnipotence.

***They have stated their goals and means to attain them. In the much vilified document, The Protocols, is plainly set forth that, "It is critical that the people become exhausted with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy, even the use of torture, starvation, *** inoculation of diseases, and poverty --leaving the nations no other vision than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty which is the control of money and all else. But if we give the nations of the world any breathing room, the moment we long for will likely never arrive." ..."

http://www.apfn.org/THEWINDS/1998/01/medical_experiments.html

More here:

https://militarytruth.org/secret-us-human-biological-experimentation/

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/experiment.htm

Chemical Warfare continuing today:

More toxic to humans than high fructose corn syrup, this dirty little secret ingredient is COMMON in U.S. foods (and beverages)

Saturday, September 15, 2018 by: S.D. Wells

"... Ever wonder why one third of all Americans get cancer at some point in their lifetime, even though hardly anyone got it a century ago? How about leukemia, do you think it’s hereditary? You would be dead wrong. A common ingredient in soft drinks and most jarred peppers and pickles causes leukemia, but no medical doctor in America has been authorized to talk about it, and most of them have no clue anyhow.

What’s the poison? It’s called sodium benzoate, and you’ll find it in popular paint stripper products, permanent spot removers, rubber cements, and lots of U.S. food products all approved by the FDA for human consumption.

Sodium benzoate was banned from the rubber making industry because many workers exposed to it developed leukemia and died..."

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-15-more-toxic-to-humans-than-high-fructose- corn-syrup-this-dirty-little-secret-is-common-in-u-s-food.html

The US Government doesn't have a leg to stand on in Syria or Georgia. Glad Putin is calling them on it.

"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2018-10-06   7:35:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]