[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Religion See other Religion Articles Title: The Perspective of Male Menopause (Henry Makow) The Perspective of Male Menopause By Henry Makow Ph.D. March 18, 2006 By Henry Makow Ph.D. At 56, I am no longer of draft age. I'm referring to the press gang of nature. I am no longer needed to father a child. I know this because my sex drive is not what it used to be. I can "perform" fine but don't need to as much. Far from being alarmed, I am relieved. As the hormonal fog evaporates, I have moments of clarity that I'd like to share with younger males still on the treadmill of sex and romantic love. After survival, the reproductive urge is our most powerful natural instinct. The enemies of civilization, who are Satanists, promote free sex because it shreds the social fabric and creates havoc. Incredible as it sounds, these people subtly control government, the media and education. (There is no other explanation for a pernicious dogma like feminism, dedicated to diminishing woman's role as wife and mother.) The hallmark of civilization is limiting sex to love and marriage. This humanizes sex and encourages the formation of families which are the building blocks of society. The alternative is "free love" where man is essentially a dog and woman a fire hydrant. Throughout my lifetime I was taught that sex for its own sake is actually profound and worthwhile. I was taught that sexual inhibitions are neurotic; orgasms are mystical etc. Woody Allen quipped, "For an empty experience, sex is the best there is." Let's put this in perspective. As recently as 45 years ago, our sexual norms were governed by religious principles. I remember that in 1960 there was still a social stigma against illegitimate children. I don't favor unkindness toward anyone. But this stigma was removed by a force that is determined to destroy the social fabric (i.e. family unit). We shriek at the position of women in Saudi Arabia but in Chicago in 1912, a woman could be arrested and fined for showing too much leg getting out of a car. Ben Hecht recalls that the police arrested women for "smoking cigarettes, for shopping without their corsets on...for using profanity...for wearing slacks and shorts, for kissing in public, for wearing a man's hat, for sitting alone in a cafe or drinking in a saloon, for driving an automobile without a male in attendance, for putting too much paint on their faces or cutting their hair too short." (A Child of the Century, p.47) This is a reminder that our civilization was founded on Christian values. These proscriptions were extreme and needed reform but they had a sound basis. They were designed to channel women into the role of wife and mother as opposed to sexual free-agents. The forces that destroyed these taboos also undermined the role of wife and mother. They are gradually inducting us into their sex cult without our knowledge. "Secular" is their term for satanic. The "freedom" they trumpet is freedom from the self-discipline necessary to stay healthy and happy. SEX: THE NEW RELIGION Jung said that when you take God away, men create false Gods. First, our Illuminati masters programmed us to recoil at the word "God". They created a false simplistic image they could easily discredit . God never was a dotty old man who lets evil triumph. He is a Spirit, the love of perfection, and the creative positive force in the universe. God's will cannot be done unless men (and women) do it. God is not responsible for evil. Men (and women) are. In place of God, the Illuminati gave us the bogus religion of sex and romantic love, which they din into our heads in movies and popular music. There is nothing mystical about sex. It is mostly about reproduction. Nature gave us hunger so we will eat; lust so we will propagate. This natural instinct has been distorted and has taken the place of religion. Romantic love is our sublimated religious urge applied to the object of our sexual infatuation. We associate the reproductive instinct with women but men are equally held hostage. Men just don't recognize it. When they are attracted to a female, they rarely think, "Oh, nature is trying to get me to breed again." Most men are helpless victims of powerful reproductive drives. They are fascinated, even awe-struck, by any comely young (i.e. fertile) female regardless of her character, personality, ability or intelligence. Men often invest the fertile young thing with great mystery and usually, she won't disabuse them. She lets them think she is the "missing piece." Like so many things we idolize, as Gertrude Stein said about Oakland, "there's no there there." When it comes to sex and romance, popular kulture is peddling a hoax. A woman is peripheral to a man who knows his business, and subconsciously women know this. They shun men who put them on a pedestal. The romantic inflation of woman is the principle cause of arrested development in males. (This is why the Illuminati media empower and idealize women.) Any man who thinks a woman has something profound that he cannot live without is destined to remain a child. He is looking for himself. Women want men who serve God. Men (and women) were created to be God's agents. We know God by doing His will, by serving Him though our actions. Women serve God by serving husband and children and are loved, honored and served in return. When women serve themselves, they end up alone and bitter. Feminism has deprived young women of their natural social role. As a result many are in crisis, binging on drugs alcohol and sex. See one lady's account in her book "Smashed." Until we recognize that mankind is in the grip of a powerful satanic force, we will remain defenseless. Elite social engineers are waging an undeclared war on society. By attacking sexual roles, and separating sex from marriage and procreation, they hope to divert, degrade and control us.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Red Jones, Zipporah (#0)
Oakland? Gertrude Stein? Can I vote Melvins?
#5. To: Dakmar (#1)
Can I vote Melvins? Would we expect anything less?? ;P
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||