[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Ron Paul See other Ron Paul Articles Title: Report: Giuliani Says 'Of Course' Clinton Should Be Investigated Report: Giuliani Says 'Of Course' Clinton Should Be Investigated (Getty Images) By Cathy Burke | Wednesday, 21 November 2018 04:30 PM President Donald Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani insists that “of course” Hillary Clinton should be investigated for allegedly “destroying evidence in a gross and massive way.” In an interview with The Hill, the former mayor of New York City and a federal prosecutor said Clinton’s deletion of 30,000 emails shows possible obstruction of justice. “Of course she should be investigated,” he said, adding: “There is plenty of evidence that Hillary obstructed justice by destroying evidence in a gross and massive way.” Clinton deleted the emails on her private server before an investigation of her emails use as secretary of state under President Barack Obama. She argued the deleted emails were personal and irrelevant to the probe of her allegedly improper handling of classified information. During the 13-minute phone interview with The Hill, Giuliani also weighed in on Trump’s adviser and daughter Ivanka Trump’s use of a personal email account last year, calling it unfair to compare that situation with Clinton’s. “It’s one thing to violate one rule of the 5,000 rules that exist when you are first on board, but to have preserved everything so it is all there,” Giuliani said of Ivanka Trump’s personal email usage while in the White House. But that was different “than to set up a whole system after you’ve been in government all your life and helped to write some of those rules,” he said of Clinton. “It’s so stupid!” Giuliani told The Hill. “So [Ivanka] used her personal email. The thing wrong with Hillary is not that she used her personal email. It’s that she didn’t maintain it. She destroyed it. She destroyed the emails. Somebody used a sledgehammer.” Giuliani also defended Trump in the wake of a New York Times report that the president told then-White House counsel Donald McGahn last spring that he wanted to order the Department of Justice to prosecute Clinton and former FBI Director James Comey. “I don’t see how a president is prevented from saying someone should be investigated when there is public, probable cause that they committed a crime,” Giuliani said. “Someone is under investigation and all of a sudden 30,000 emails disappear and someone takes a sledgehammer to them? I’m telling you, she is going in front of a grand jury,” Giuliani said. On the Russia investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller, Giuliani told The Hill it’s unlikely Trump will sit for an in-person interview, though he added, “we are not going to close our minds 1,000 percent to it.” “We weren’t going to answer any obstruction [questions],” Giuliani told The Hill. “We don’t believe we should have to, because it is all privileged communication between the president and his subordinates. It is not obstruction to fire one of your subordinates. It is not obstruction to give advice to one of your subordinates.” Poster Comment: The Clinton's have run the DNC for the past 25 years. And it is my belief they did away with Seth Rich because he had the goods on them to show how they cheated in the Primary to knock Bernie Sanders out of the box. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
And the R's waited until AFTER the elections they lost in the house in which to investigate. That is the typical type crap we see where it's all about politics and never about principle.
That is the typical type crap we see where it's all about politics and never about principle. Trey Gowdy was doing Yeoman's work in his investigations. Now all of that has gone for naught. When the Dims take over those committees the stone walling will all be in high gear again. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||