See other Immigration Articles
Title: Justice Dept: Judge's Ruling Blocking Asylum 'Absurd'
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.newsmax.com/politics/as ... 018&s=acs&dkt_nbr=0101028zh1nq
Published: Nov 20, 2018
Author: AP
Post Date: 2018-11-24 21:48:28 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 468
Comments: 10
Justice Dept: Judge's Ruling Blocking Asylum 'Absurd' (AP) Tuesday, 20 November 2018 03:24 PM The U.S. Department of Justice on Tuesday said it would continue to defend President Donald Trump's decision to make immigrants who enter the country illegally from Mexico ineligible for asylum, after a federal judge temporarily blocked the policy. Trump cited an overwhelmed immigration system for his recent proclamation that officials will only process asylum claims for migrants who present themselves at an official entry point along the U.S.-Mexico frontier. But civil rights groups sued, and on Monday U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco issued a temporary restraining order saying Congress has clearly allowed immigrants to apply for asylum regardless of how they entered the country. The Justice Department on Tuesday said it was "absurd" that Tigar allowed civil rights groups to have the ability "to stop the entire federal government from acting so that illegal aliens can receive a government benefit to which they are not entitled." The asylum ruling came as thousands of Central Americans, including a large number of children, are traveling in caravans toward the U.S. border to escape violence and poverty at home. Some have already arrived at Tijuana, a Mexican city on the border with California. "We look forward to continuing to defend the Executive Branch's legitimate and well-reasoned exercise of its authority to address the crisis at our southern border," the Justice Department said. In a statement after the ruling, American Civil Liberties Union attorney Lee Gelernt said Trump's policy puts people's lives in danger. "There is no justifiable reason to flatly deny people the right to apply for asylum, and we cannot send them back to danger based on the manner of their entry," Gelernt said. Tigar, whose decision to block the asylum restriction marked the latest courtroom defeat for Trump on immigration policy, was nominated to the court by former President Barack Obama. His Monday order, which took effect immediately, applies nationwide and lasts until Dec. 19, when the judge scheduled a hearing to consider a more long-lasting injunction. Poster Comment: Screw these Dim judges who were appointed by Obummer.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
(Edited)
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay. Do sanctuary statutes fit the bill here? I'm loathe to call them laws, since they violate the very spirit of such.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay. Do sanctuary statutes fit the bill here? I'm loathe to call them laws, since they violate the very spirit of such.
I was reading a story once about this father and son working in the farm fields. An INS helicopter flew overhead and several of the farm workers began to run. His son began to run also and the father hollered at him, "What are you running for? You were born here." LOL
There are no replies to Comment # 10. End Trace Mode for Comment # 10.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestArticle 1 - The Legislative Branch
Section 10 - Powers Prohibited of States
#9. To: Dakmar (#1)
(Edited)
Article 1 - The Legislative Branch
Section 10 - Powers Prohibited of States
I don't know for sure. Maybe there is some Imminent Danger involved from Mafioso sorts and foreign Power entities if they don't hide tons of invaders for them to divide Americans and disintegrate the soveriegn nationhood of the United States into: 1. UN partitioned and ruled regions or 2. (as Ann Coulter describes it) just another third world country or 3. (as Bill Whittle describes it) just a general postal destination for mail or 4. all of the above. Possibly such declarative "sanctuary" zones would require our Military's intervention to liberate our States from the coercive forces. This Federal statute, though, prohibits "sanctuarial" Harboring of aliens: Title 8 U.S. Code § 1324 
#10. To: GreyLmist (#9)
Harboring of aliens
Replies to Comment # 10.
