Title: Meet All of the Ways the U.S. Navy Could Sink China's Aircraft Carriers Source:
[None] URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxuJibdgueg Published:Dec 6, 2018 Author:US Military System Post Date:2019-01-10 05:28:34 by BTP Holdings Keywords:None Views:56 Comments:5
The U.S. Navy, then, will deploy no single carrier-kiIIer weapon. It will deploy many. Coupled with submarine warfare and naval aviation, newfangled surface-warfare implements will stand the U.S. Navy in good stead for blue-water engagements by 2020.
Ah, yes, the “carrier-kiIIer.” China is forever touting the array of guided missiIes its weaponeers have devised to pummel U.S. Navy nucIear-powered aircraft carriers (CVNs). Most prominent among them are its DF-21D and DF-26 antiship ballistic missiIes (ASBMs), which the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has made a mainstay of China’s anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) defense.
Beijing has made believers of important audiences, including the scribes who toil away at the Pentagon producing estimates of Chinese martial might. Indeed, the most recent annual report on Chinese military power states matter-of-factly that the PLA can now use DF-21Ds to “attack ships, including aircraft carriers,” more than nine hundred statute miles from China’s shorelines.
neither does because it is the same a declaring war.
Of course you do recall what transpired after December 7, 1941 when the Japs attacked Pearl Harbor? The thing is about that is the War Department had an idea it was coming but they sent word by regular U.S. Mail rather than by military channels which would have put the base on high alert.
I think that FDR wanted a war with Japan to help pull the U.S. out of the Great Depression. Lots of study must be put in on the subject of WW II. And then there is the fact the U.S. was supporting the British in other ways. And the Russians got a lot of military hardware thru the Lend-Lease program.
There is also the Kondratieff Wave which shows the capitalist system would recover. These cycles run every 40 to 60 years. ;)