[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Here Are The Democrats Who Have Expressed Support For Some Kind Of A Border Barrier
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/15/ ... barrier-wall/?utm_medium=email
Published: Jan 15, 2019
Author: Amber Athey
Post Date: 2019-01-15 22:04:20 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 376
Comments: 9

Here Are The Democrats Who Have Expressed Support For Some Kind Of A Border Barrier

2:33 PM 01/15/2019 | Politics
Amber Athey | White House Correspondent

As Democratic leadership refuses to give President Donald Trump a single dollar for the border wall, rank-and-file Democrats are publicly expressing support for funding some kind of physical barrier.

The partial government shutdown over border security is now in its fourth week, as Democrats refuse to fulfill the president’s request for $5.7 billion in funding for the wall. At most, Democratic leaders have offered just $1.6 billion for “border security” and nothing for the wall — even if Trump re-opens the government prior to negotiating.

Two administration officials told The Daily Caller on Tuesday that are planning on exploiting fissures in the Democratic Party, particularly among newly-elected Democrats in border states whose constituents support a physical border barrier. The White House hopes the strategy puts pressure on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.

The strategy appears to be a sound one, as a number of Democrats have publicly stated that they support funding for at least a partial border wall or fence.

Freshman Democratic California Rep. Katie Hill told CNN last week that she would “vote for some money for physical barriers.”

Democratic Washington Rep. Adam Smith conceded that “the wall is not in itself a bad idea” and that he voted for some fencing in the past, but claimed that the president has not appropriately justified adding more barriers on the border.

“If we have a partial wall, if we have fencing, if we have technology used to keep our borders safe, all of that is fine,” Democratic Illinois Rep. Cheri Bustos said on CNN before admonishing the president for refusing to accept anything less than $5.7 billion for a barrier.

Democratic California Rep. John Garamendi similarly said that he would support a border fence, stating, “Democrats have repeatedly said that we will support border security, we will support all of its elements including fences.”

“There may be places where everybody will agree, ‘Yeah, a wall makes sense there,'” Independent Maine Sen. Angus King said, adding that he believes the current debate in Congress is a full wall versus open borders.

Republican Virginia Rep. Denver Riggleman claimed on WMAL’s “Mornings on the Mall” yesterday that even more Democrats admit privately that they support some kind of physical barrier.

Notably, Trump is no longer proposing a solid concrete wall across the entire border as he hinted at during the 2016 campaign. Rather, similar to the wishes of the above Democrats, the White House’s border wall proposal includes fencing in highly-trafficked areas, concrete walls in areas prone to flooding, drone technology and repairs to existing fencing.


Poster Comment:

Build the wall!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

Build a CONCRETE wall!

sneakypete  posted on  2019-01-16   7:46:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: sneakypete (#1)

Build a CONCRETE wall!

Maybe we can get those beaners to build a wall of adobe six feet thick. Then all we have to worry about is them digging tunnels under it. ;)

Amid border-wall debate, third drug tunnel found in less than a month in Nogales

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-01-18   7:25:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: BTP Holdings (#4)

Maybe we can get those beaners to build a wall of adobe six feet thick. Then all we have to worry about is them digging tunnels under it. ;)

Reinforced concrete is a LOT tougher than adobe,and a 10 foot footing with sensors buried a couple of feet in the ground to detect digging will take care of that.

Common sense will tell you that if a concrete wall wouldn't work,the left wouldn't be protesting it. They NEED the foreign vote to stay in power,and they know it.

sneakypete  posted on  2019-01-18   8:13:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: sneakypete (#5)

I was reading where the Mexicans have constructed tunnels as much as 20 feet under the surface. It is really something when you consider that ICE only considers 15% of the southern border to be secure.

Here is a great article by Christian Science Monitor about what is being done to detect tunnels. The number discovered since 1990 have now reached 154 and most of those are in the far southwest area in California and Arizona. ;)

www.csmonitor.com/World/A...Monitor/2011/1118/Tunnel-detection- technology-at-US-Mexico-border-Is-it-worth-the-effort

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-01-18   18:41:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: BTP Holdings (#6)

It is impossible to dig a tunnel under a wall with embedded sensors and not be caught.

sneakypete  posted on  2019-01-18   18:59:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: sneakypete (#7)

It is impossible to dig a tunnel under a wall with embedded sensors and not be caught.

This article is from 2017. So where are these sensors now? Is it merely a pipe dream? ;)

www.govtechworks.com/sens...einforce-new-border-wall/

RVSS and its relatives focus on those trying to cross the border above ground. The Coast Guard and Navy focus on keeping out those who might come by sea. Tunnels, however, pose yet one more problem: No matter how tall the wall nor how far cameras see, tunnels are among the most difficult border breaches to find and stop.

Border Patrol agents have discovered more than 168 tunnels since 1990, some as deep as 80 feet underground, the agency reports. Agents use MarcBot robots acquired from the Army to explore the tunnel interiors.

Ground-penetrating radar can be effective in identifying shallower tunnels, but the deepest ones are beyond radar’s reach. CBP has explored other technologies developed for mining and oil drilling to identify deeper tunnels, but so far those have proved of only limited use, officials say.

President Trump’s talk of a wall is ultimately both descriptive and metaphorical. Securing the border will require a multitude of approaches designed to stop specific threats in specific locations. Customs and Border Protection’s first attempt to solve the border problem with technology – the $1.6 billion SBInet program – was killed in 2011 after repeated delays and cost overruns.

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-01-18   23:38:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 8.

#9. To: BTP Holdings (#8)

It is impossible to dig a tunnel under a wall with embedded sensors and not be caught.

This article is from 2017. So where are these sensors now? Is it merely a pipe dream? ;)

Well,for one thing how can you put vibration sensors in a wall that doesn't exist?

sneakypete  posted on  2019-01-19 18:46:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]