[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

'Dangerous' Chagas disease confirmed in California, raising concerns for Bay Area

MICROPLASTICS ARE LINKED TO HEART DISEASE; HERE'S HOW TO LOWER YOUR RISK

This Scholar PREDICTED the COLLAPSE of America 700 years ago

I Got ChatGPT To Admit Its Antichrist Purpose

"The CIA is inside Venezuela right now" Col Macgregor says regime change is coming

Caroline Kennedy’s son, Jack Schlossberg, mulling a run.

Florida Surgeon General Nukes ALL School Vaxx Mandates, Likens Them to Slavery

Doc on High Protein Diet. Try for more plant based protein.

ICE EMPTIES Amazon Warehouse… Prime Orders HALTED as ‘Migrant Workforce’ REMOVED

Trump to ask SCOTUS to reverse E. Jean Carroll sex-abuse verdict

Wary Of Gasoline Shortage, California Pauses Price-Gouging Penalty On Oil Companies

Jewish activist Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for the destruction of European

The Democrats Are Literally Making Stuff Up!

Turn Dead Dirt Into Living Soil With IMO 4

Michael Knowles: Trump & Israel, Candace Owens, and Why Christianity Is Booming Despite the Attacks

Save Canada's Ostrich Farms! Protests Erupt Over Government Tyranny in Canada

Holy SH*T! Poland just admitted the TRUTH about Zelensky and it's not good

Very Alarming Earthquakes Strike As We Enter The Month Of September

Billionaire Airbnb Co-Founder Reveals Why He Abandoned Democrat Party For Trump

Monsoon floods devastate Punjab’s crops, (1.7 billion people) at risk of food crisis

List Of 18 Things That Are Going To Happen Within The Next 40 Days

Pentagon Taps 600 Military Lawyers To Serve As Temporary Immigration Judges For DOJ

81 Actors Who Have Passed Away So Far in 2025

High school is different now

Banks REMOVING CASH and nearing major DISASTER. Prof St Onge.

Did America Pick the Wrong Side in WWII?

Chicago in CHAOS – Mayor Tells Police to Stand Down as Trump Says ENOUGH Murder

Graham Linehan ARRESTED in UK for gender critical tweets - UK COLLAPSE IS IMMINENT

Cash Jordan: 400,000 Illegals ‘Forcibly Returned’ To Mexico… as NYC COLLAPSES

The ChatGPT CEO's Web Of Lies by Vanessa Wingardh


Ron Paul
See other Ron Paul Articles

Title: All of the Oxygen has Been Sucked Out of the Trump Movement, Presidency on Life-Support
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://dailystormer.name/all-of-th ... nt-presidency-on-life-support/
Published: Mar 8, 2019
Author: Andrew Anglin
Post Date: 2019-03-08 08:49:08 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 1050
Comments: 22

All of the energy is gone from the Trump movement, and the presidency is being exclusively propped-up by Fox News, which doesn’t even really support him that much.

The CPAC speech was a testing of the messaging of “we need more people,” and that is apparently going to be included in the 2020 campaign.

Thanks for that, Jared.

It isn’t just people on the far-right who are getting exhausted trying to support a man who won’t support his own supporters. At time of writing, this is a “most popular” story on Breitbart AKA Boomerbart:

People don’t even know what the hell is going on.

Breitbart: Ahead of the 2020 presidential election, President Trump is abandoning his prior “America First” legal immigration reforms to support increases of legal immigration levels in order to expand profits for businesses and corporations.

For the fourth time in about a month, Trump suggested increasing legal immigration levels. With Apple CEO Tim Cook sitting next to him at the White House on Wednesday, Trump said he not only wanted more legal immigration but that companies needed an expansion of new arrivals to grow their business.

“We’re going to have a lot of people coming into the country. We want a lot of people coming in. And we need it,” Trump said

Breitbart is one of the key sites that played a lead role in getting Trump elected.

And despite the fact that the site has gotten more hardcore, it is still a cuck site.

This is also in “most popular”:

And no, it’s not because they support the super team-up of David and Ilhan. It is all about “dems are the real racists.”

The thing that boomercons are most excited about with Trump is that he is calling Democrats anti-Semites, as that means that Republicans love Jews the most.

Other than the humiliating kikesucking Trump is engaged in, his entire support base appears to be fed-up.

The wall is a dead-in-the-water jerk around, the border is being overwhelmed, normie conservatives are getting banned from everything on the internet, there has been literally no policy enacted at all.

The only thing he could do to get boomers fired up without going against the new Kushner agenda is to sign an executive order banning partial birth abortion. I think he is probably planning on doing that, because he keeps talking about that issue, and he probably thinks that is going to be more powerful than it is.

The fact of reality is that he got elected on an immigration platform. Going out there and saying “we need more people” makes him a pointless president. It’s fun and all that he “triggers the dems,” and he has been very good for the culture war in general. But we don’t want any more fucking people in this country, man. I don’t even care where they come from, let alone whether they are “legal” or not.

Until something is done about the suicide rate of white men, and the opioid epidemic, I don’t even want to entertain the idea of European immigration. And in America, the word “immigration” never means “European immigration” anyway. It always means more brown people.

Trump did an incredible job creating a cult of personality, and I guess he thinks he can just rely on that in 2020, but there is no evidence that he can.

If the CPAC speech was a test for a 2020 platform – and I think it absolutely was – then he’s going to run on a platform of:

Being against Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and “socialism”
War in South America
Some vague stuff about freedom
That he’ll eventually get around to building a wall
That the economy is grrrrrreat
That the economy is so great we need LEGAL brown people stealing our home from us
Something about taxes

This isn’t viable.

His platform should be:

Total shutdown of immigration completely
Ending birthright citizenship
Ending wars
Free speech on the internet
Arresting Antifa on RICO charges
Stopping partial birth abortion
And I guess also being against the Green New Deal – I personally can’t even take that shit seriously, but I guess boomers care

He could at least say all of that stuff.

He went ahead and allowed all of his supporters to be banned from the internet, so there is no engine to support him even if he had support.

Honestly, I would go into diehard fanatic mode if he passed an internet Bill of Rights and got us all of our internet services back – even if he was saying this stuff about needing people. That has become the primary issue for me and my people. If he was able to protect our free speech, it wouldn’t matter what he was saying – we could speak directly to the people.

But look – there is currently no path here. Whoever is telling him it’s a good idea to start being pro-immigration is also telling him he can win without a problem in 2020 and that is simply not obvious to me.

I just can’t understand what the guy is doing. If he loses in 2020, he’s going to prison. At the very least, his entire business empire will be taken away from him, and he will die tied up in lawsuits and criminal investigations. I would think he would want to win. And he could at least lie and say he’s going to do things people want. Instead, he’s coming out with a platform no one wants.

What it looks like is that Jared Kushner has been tasked with ensuring he doesn’t get reelected. I mean, that is just the simplest explanation for all of this. We know that Kushner, via Ivanka, has an incredible amount of influence on him, especially since Bannon left.

It’s sad.

If MAGA has failed, then the only option is nuclear war.

If it’s not love that will bring us together, then it’s the bomb.

The bomb.

The bomb.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

#3. To: Ada all (#0)

Other than the humiliating kikesucking Trump is engaged in, his entire support base appears to be fed-up.

Trump's base are so-called evangelical (Zionist) Christians.

Amazing what machinations that owning both wings of One Party can do...

Rotara  posted on  2019-03-08   20:04:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: All (#3)

I haven't heard "Triangulation" used in a long time.

Probably because that is just mainstream Partisanship now.

Rotara  posted on  2019-03-08   20:07:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Rotara, Horse, lod, Esso, GreyLmist, noone222, X-15, Ada, FormerLurker, AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, BTP Holdings (#4)

I've got the fear again! :)

The Hegelian Dialectic – Pressure from above, pressure from below

Dakmar  posted on  2019-03-08   20:26:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 5.

#7. To: Dakmar (#5)

Phillip Drew, Administrator... wow.

Rotara  posted on  2019-03-08 20:40:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Dakmar, 4 (#5) (Edited)

The Hegelian Dialectic – Pressure from above, pressure from below - YouTube, 7.75 minutes | Published on Dec 6, 2011


Archiving this additional information printed in the video Description section:

Published on Dec 6, 2011

Using the opposition to get your way
How it works...

The Hegelian Dialectic is a philosophical approach that in principle explains how human beings progress toward a better and more egalitarian condition but in practice provides the power elite with a strategy for controlling society.

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (August 27, 1770 -- November 14, 1831) was among the most consequential philosophers of the Age of Enlightenment. His was heavily influenced by Plato, whose social ideal was rule by an elite composed of philosopher-kings. Though Hegel may not have intended to provide a Platonic methodology for the modern-day control of the many by the few, that is how his insights have been used.

The Platonic influence on Hegel was reinforced by the age in which he worked. Hegel accepted that "enlightened" human beings are responsible for their own destiny, and that culture and history are a product of human development, which in turn is driven by reason. Hegel subscribed to the Rousseauian notion that humans are a blank slate, a tabula rasa. In fact, Hegel was a big fan of the French, including the authoritarian leader Napoleon and the French Revolution itself, a bloodbath he described as the realization of more perfect freedom.

Today most behavioral scientists see human beings not as purely rational or perfectly elastic but as complex creatures, many of whose behaviors are instinctual or biologically programmed. This has not hindered the practical application of Hegel's conceptual tools, however, which have been used as an effective methodology of control for at least the past century.

It is necessary to examine the dialectic in a little more detail to understand this. Hegel postulated that each stage of human advance -- and the course of history itself -- was driven by an argument (thesis), a counterargument (anti-thesis) and finally a synthesis of the two into a more advanced argument, at which point the process restarted. For Hegel, the dialectic could explain everything -- art, culture, history, even nature.

From our more modern vantage point, Hegel's dialectic may not seem so persuasive as an explanation of all things -- and in fact, it probably is not. But for the elite of his day, and for the monetary elite today, the Hegelian dialectic provides tools for the manipulation of society.

To move the public from point A to point B, one need only find a spokesperson for a certain argument and position him or her as an authority. That person represents Goalpost One. Another spokesperson is positioned on the other side of the argument, to represent Goalpost Two.

Argument A and B can then be used to manipulate a given social discussion. If one wishes, for instance, to promote Idea C, one merely needs to promote the arguments of Goalpost One (that tend to promote Idea C) more effectively than the arguments of Goalpost Two. This forces a slippage of Goalpost Two's position. Thus both Goalpost One and Goalpost Two advance downfield toward Idea C. Eventually, Goalpost Two occupies Goalpost One's original position. The "anti-C" argument now occupies the pro-C position. In this manner whole social conversations are shifted from, say, a debate over market freedom vs. socialism to a debate about the degree of socialism that is desirable.

The Hegelian dialectic is a powerful technique for influencing the conversations of cultures and nations, especially if one already controls (owns) much of the important media in which the arguments take place. One can then, as the monetary elite characteristically do, emphasize one argument at the expense of the other, effectively shifting the positions of Goalposts One and Two.


The Daily Bell source linked in the video Description for that printout is unavailable. This is an alternate source that also includes the video of Edward G. Griffin's commentary on the same page:

The Hegelian Dialectic – Pressure from above, pressure from below | SheepleTV.com | Added by Sheeple1 on 07/08/2013


This is a link and article excerpts for a topic of relevance to the issues referenced above, with emphasis on America's schools:

Betrayed - Why Public Education Is Failing: Delphi Technique: The art of pretending to achieve consensus

"To me consensus seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies in search of something in which no one believes, but to which no one objects—the process of avoiding the very issues that have to be solved, merely because you cannot get agreement on the way ahead. What great cause would have been fought and won under the banner 'I stand for consensus'?" -- British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, 1981


A new definition of “dialogue.” Concerned that we weren’t allowed to debate anything, I asked that “dialogue” be added to our “norms” (our rules for behavior.) The word was added, but at the next meeting, the secondary math coordinator explained at length how “dialogue” means to not discuss the issues. In each group, he said, a person was to say something, and then tablemates were to respond, one by one, each with a thought that was brief, not an opinion, and not a challenge. We were then to move on.

Most people find it difficult to combat all of this. It’s uncomfortable being the odd one out. It’s exhausting to fight for every inch of ground, every word, every phrase, every idea … and then look up to find that what was said isn’t there. It’s hard to go back and do it again the next day. (And if one’s job depends on getting along with the people who run that committee, it can be a devastating choice one makes to continually try to get a solid word in edgewise. I think most employees won’t dare fight that battle.)

And so, most people give up and get quiet – or they suddenly find they have time conflicts and must drop out. Those who remain on the committee tend to be supporters of the institutional agenda, or they’re willing to go along to get along, or they become convinced they’re being heard. Dissent evaporates, and things quiet down. The few who continue to present an opposing view are easily managed and dismissed. Voila! “Consensus.”


From the Comment section:

1. I experienced this technique in Los Alamos, NM, where my children attended school a few years ago. The School District planted teachers (employees) in each group to direct "Public" comment. Even so there were so many angry parents that they could not control our opinions. So they rejected the results of the first meeting and called a 2nd meeting. When enough of us showed up at the 2nd meeting to dominate against their employees pretending to be parents, they rejected the results of the 2nd meeting and called a 3rd meeting. By the 3rd meeting a lot of parents had gotten discouraged. Our loud voice was not going to be heard. By the 3rd meeting there wasn't enough people to drown out their employee shills, so they adopted the voice of their shills and called it "public comment approval." It was a total scam.

2. this is exactly what happened in the Seattle Elementary Math Adoption. They had this facilitator flown in from California for the purpose of pressing an agenda. It backfired and the Seattle schools got the curriculum they did not want (TERC). The Chief Academic Officer had to come in [to] "suggest" an alternative. Then, she and her underlings proceeded to browbeat the opposition until EveryDay Math was selected. It was a Circus of Fools.

EDM is failing miserably now in Seattle. They were warned this would happen during the process, but "facilitators" kept running interference. Saxon Math was eliminated within 30 minutes of the actual consensus building process.

3. What you have just named and described is what I have encountered with District 81 any time "public comment" has been requested. Yet the results are always what the District wanted in the first place and achieved by its dog-and-pony shows, smoke and mirrors. Meanwhile, more of the District's waning resources have been spent. Consensus sounds so productive and yet is a tool to control outcomes and quash dissent. Beware! Targeted and now former teacher

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-06-07 10:35:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]