[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: Kushner, Inc. Book Review Part V: The Kushner Crime Family on the Road to the White House In previous parts of this review of Kushner, Inc. by Vicky Ward, we covered the history of the Kushner Crime Family and their attachment to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign. In this section, we will cover the way that Jared Kushner single-handedly ran the Trump transition team after pushing out Chris Christie, and the various crimes he committed during that process. When on November 8 at 2:29 AM, the Associated Press called Wisconsin for Trump and declared him the winner of the 2016 presidential election, Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller got to work on a victory speech. Bannon was getting revved up to write something “fire-breathing”—something that gave a shout-out to the people he fondly called the “hobbits” and the “forgotten” men who had voted for Trump. He was clear on what was needed in the moment: “We’re marching on Washington.… This is a rally speech.” “Marching on Washington” really gets the blood flowing. That would have been glorious. Instead, what we ended up with was a concession speech in place of a victory speech. We were all flying too high to see it at the time, but the speech Trump gave was calling for unity, thanking Hillary and calling her a good person, all kinds of surrendering. And it turns out that Jared and Ivanka had convinced Trump to veto the Bannon/Miller speech, and “deescalate.” So, when Trump took the podium at the New York Hilton hotel in midtown Manhattan at almost 3 A.M., he began by praising Hillary Clinton and saying: “Now it’s time for Americans to bind the wounds of division.… We will seek common ground, not hostility; partnership, not conflict.” I have since gone back and watched that speech, and was shocked by how out of place it was. And of course, just like everything else that has gone wrong with the Trump administration, the Jew was behind it. In hindsight, Bannon would see something more profound in the alterations. Right there, within thirty minutes of winning the election, was the first sign of the personal conflict that would later wreak so much havoc in the Trump administration. The speech was a mess; contradictory and strange, wimpy and tough. “That speech is the original sin of this administration,” he thought. Bannon had believed—and still believes—that Trump is a transformational historical figure, a disrupter, an agent of change. The man might be temperamental and deeply flawed, but his ability to connect to the forgotten man, to articulate the raw anger among the working class, is extraordinary. But Kushner and Ivanka, Bannon felt, had no understanding of that. What they saw was raw power, and they wanted Trump to be liked. But that night showed them they’d face an uphill battle to become America’s first prince and princess. Kushner was shocked that Trump never mentioned him in his speech and would later tell people he felt slighted. He was going to find a way to get Trump to notice him more, to trust him more. Ivanka would help him. As Trump moved toward the White House, the couple would become known as a single, powerful entity: Javanka. This is just an incredible level of hubris. Kushner wants to be the controlling Jew behind the curtain, but he also wants to be publicly credited for that role, which sort of defeats the purpose of being a Jew behind the curtain. And this is a hubris that again shows just how incapable Kushner is. He actually believes he was responsible for the win, when in fact he almost sank the campaign by taking over and firing Lewindowski, and it was only saved by Bannon. Trump didn’t win the 2016 election because of Kushner, but despite him. And now that Kushner has solidified his control over Trump, it is going to be incredibly difficult – I think impossible – for Trump to win in 2020. The book chronicles how important the internet was for Trump in the 2016 election, but under the advisement of Kushner, Trump has made no moves whatsoever to attempt to respond to the censorship online that is crushing his support base. In fact, he said that he would win despite the censorship by “being really good.” It is headed for disaster. What is shocking with the Bannon-Kushner dynamic is that early on, Bannon was actually on the same side as Kushner. This is what happens to a boomer who is afraid of the word “Jew.” The first thing they did together was gang-attack Chris Christie and get him fired from heading up the transition team. Before the book was released, Christie wrote a very good article about this scene in POLITICO. It is quite clear that Christie didn’t interview for the Ward book (which is surprising, given that he gives the impression of a guy who would interview for any book, especially one attacking the Kushners), but Bannon did interview for it. Christie’s POLITICO description of the firing scene didn’t mention Bannon. In fact, in the book, Christie comes to Bannon for emotional support after the decision is made, and apparently didn’t even know that Bannon sided with Kushner. He knows now. Kushner had the obvious reason to hate Christie – he had prosecuted his father. Bannon was just against him because he was establishment GOP. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||