[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination

How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon

Newmont Pulls Out of Canada, Delists TSX

Eva Vlaardingerbroek's Warning: Elites Plan to Make Humans Immortal in the Cloud

The $7.9 Trillion Company You've Never Heard Of

CCP's motivation for (the Korean) war was to grow its military: US-China-Russia relations

Here is What REALLY Happened on 9/11

US Deficit Explodes In August Despite Rising Tariff Revenues As Government Spending Soars

Adolf Hitler had 'some good ideas', a fifth of Gen Z Americans believe according to Daily Mail poll

New 4um Site Software Ready For Review

"Calling Me Names Is NOT Gonna Stop Me!" Tucker Carlson on Ted Cruz, Trump, Israel & 9/11

Vietnam Erases 86 Million Bank Accounts – (NWO) Great Reset in Motion

Vietnam Erases 86 Million Bank Accounts – (NWO) Great Reset in Motion

Rifle Ammo In Kirk Assassination Engraved With 'Transtifa' Ideology: Law Enforcement Memo

Time for MASSIVE change in America (Black Crime and the Media))


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: "Undocumented Immigrant" Is a Made-Up Term That Ignores the Law
Source: The Heritage Foundation
URL Source: https://www.heritage.org/immigratio ... rant-made-term-ignores-the-law
Published: Jul 30, 2018
Author: Hans A. von Spakovsky
Post Date: 2019-05-20 15:18:02 by GreyLmist
Ping List: *Illegal Immigration*     Subscribe to *Illegal Immigration*
Keywords: Illegal Aliens, Immigration Law
Views: 340
Comments: 5

Intro Summary:

Using terms like “undocumented immigrant” is intended to blur and extinguish the line between legal and illegal immigration.

1. “Undocumented immigrant” is a politically correct, made-up term used to obscure the fact that such aliens have violated U.S. immigration law.

2. The Supreme Court, which has decided numerous cases involving federal immigration law, also uses the correct, precise legal term of “illegal alien.”

3. The Justice Department has a constitutional duty to enforce the immigration laws passed by Congress against illegal aliens.


Article:

The news media is reporting that an internal email at the Justice Department has reminded its lawyers that the legally correct term they should be using in their briefs is “illegal alien,” not the euphemism “undocumented immigrant.”

The Justice Department leadership is correct. Illegal alien is the correct legal term that should be used.

“Undocumented immigrant” is a politically correct, made-up term adopted by pro-illegal alien advocacy groups and liberal media outlets to obscure the fact that such aliens have violated U.S. immigration law and are in the country illegally.

Precision in the law is a vital principle, since the exact words used in statutes, regulations, contracts, guidance documents, and policy statements can significantly affect how they are applied and interpreted.

If we are going to discuss and debate the issue of immigration and what our public policy should be, we should at least use accurate, precise terms, and talk about, for example, legal aliens vs. illegal aliens.

Government lawyers in particular have an obligation to use the correct language of the federal statutes they are sworn to uphold and enforce.

Federal immigration law uses the term “illegal alien.” For example, 8 U.S.C. §1365 is a provision that deals with a reimbursement program the federal government has for states that are incarcerating illegal aliens. Its very title refers to “illegal aliens,” and that term is used in the statute itself, which defines an illegal alien as anyone “who is in the United States unlawfully.”

“Alien”—rather than “immigrant”—is the correct legal term, since “alien” is defined in 8 U.S.C. §1101 (a)(3) as “any person not a citizen or national of the United States.”

The Supreme Court, which has decided numerous cases involving federal immigration law, also uses the correct, precise legal term of “illegal alien.”

In 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen pointed this out in his decision granting an injunction against the implementation of President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents, the so-called DAPA program.

As Hanen said in a footnote:

The Court also understands that there is a certain segment of the population that finds the phrase ‘illegal alien’ offensive. The court uses this term because it is the term used by the Supreme Court in its latest pronouncement pertaining to this area of the law. See Arizona v. U.S., 132 S. Ct. 2492 (2012).

Hanen was, of course, correct in his assessment. The Supreme Court used the term “illegal alien” not only in that case, but in numerous prior decisions, some of which are cited in Arizona v. U.S.

Under federal law, any individual in this country who is not a citizen is an alien. And any alien who is here without [lawful] permission is here illegally. End of story.

But of course, the propaganda war in the public arena cares little for facts and actual statutory language.

Pro-illegal alien groups, politicians who push “sanctuary” policies and open borders, and protesters who want to abolish the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, want to persuade the American public that those here illegally are no different than those who followed the rules to come here lawfully.

Using terms like “undocumented immigrant” is intended to blur and extinguish the line between legal and illegal immigration.

Advocates for illegal aliens want to stifle debate by making the false claim that if you are against “undocumented immigrants”—aka illegal aliens—you must be a racist, a nativist, or someone who hates all immigrants.

That is false and shameful demagoguery of the worst kind. The United States is the most generous country in the world when it comes to legal immigration. We take in more than 1 million legal immigrants a year—more than any other country in the world.

But support for legal immigration doesn’t mean we must also support illegal immigration. In fact, we have an obligation to prevent illegal aliens from breaking our laws and entering our country surreptitiously.

The term “illegal alien” is neither dehumanizing, nor demeaning. It is the precise legal term for those whose status in this country is unlawful.

President Ronald Reagan once said that “a nation that cannot control its borders is not a nation.”

The Justice Department has a constitutional duty to enforce the immigration laws passed by Congress against illegal aliens. Basic standards of professionalism and good advocacy require that its lawyers use the legally correct and accurate language of the statutes they enforce as applied by the Supreme Court.


This piece originally appeared in The Daily Signal Subscribe to *Illegal Immigration*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

#2. To: GreyLmist (#0)

BTW: it was the great, wonderful, we all bow Reagan that coined the term "undocumented immigrant" and it stuck. By using this it makes the slags look good

Darkwing  posted on  2019-05-21   8:15:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 2.

#3. To: Darkwing (#2)

BTW: it was the great, wonderful, we all bow Reagan that coined the term "undocumented immigrant" and it stuck. By using this it makes the slags look good

As far as I could determine, the "undocumented immigrants" phrasing was part of the so-called Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, which was legislation passed invalidly by Congress in violation of the Constitution's Uniform Rule of Naturalization clause. Bizarrely, their supposed intent was to "legalize" nearly 3 million illegal alien migrant-workers here by an "Amnesty" for them that was itself an Unconstitutional Congressional action. Reagan should have refused to sign it but didn't because he expected that Congress would better secure the border, which didn't happen after they got what they wanted from his signature. He even went a step further by issuing an Executive Order of "Amnesty" for the children of those illegal aliens who were also here (an "extra gift" that benefited an estimated 100,000 families) and still Congress neglected border security. That's reportedly why he regreted his part in the Amnesty fiasco to appease Congress for better border security, all of which was wrongful and unlawful.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-05-21 15:53:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]