[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination

How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon

Newmont Pulls Out of Canada, Delists TSX

Eva Vlaardingerbroek's Warning: Elites Plan to Make Humans Immortal in the Cloud

The $7.9 Trillion Company You've Never Heard Of

CCP's motivation for (the Korean) war was to grow its military: US-China-Russia relations

Here is What REALLY Happened on 9/11

US Deficit Explodes In August Despite Rising Tariff Revenues As Government Spending Soars

Adolf Hitler had 'some good ideas', a fifth of Gen Z Americans believe according to Daily Mail poll

New 4um Site Software Ready For Review

"Calling Me Names Is NOT Gonna Stop Me!" Tucker Carlson on Ted Cruz, Trump, Israel & 9/11

Vietnam Erases 86 Million Bank Accounts – (NWO) Great Reset in Motion

Vietnam Erases 86 Million Bank Accounts – (NWO) Great Reset in Motion

Rifle Ammo In Kirk Assassination Engraved With 'Transtifa' Ideology: Law Enforcement Memo

Time for MASSIVE change in America (Black Crime and the Media))


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: The Myth of the “Otherwise Law-Abiding” Illegal Alien
Source: Center for Immigration Studies
URL Source: https://cis.org/Myth-Otherwise-LawAbiding-Illegal-Alien
Published: Oct 7, 2013
Author: Jon Feere
Post Date: 2019-05-20 21:25:31 by GreyLmist
Ping List: *Illegal Immigration*     Subscribe to *Illegal Immigration*
Keywords: Illegal Aliens, Immigration Law, Violations, Law Resource
Views: 342
Comments: 7

Jon Feere is the Legal Policy Analyst at the Center for Immigration Studies.


Excerpts:

For years advocates of amnesty and high levels of immigration have described the illegal alien population as one made up of "otherwise law-abiding" people who have committed no violation other than the simple act of crossing a border illegally or overstaying a visa.1 Journalists routinely invoke this language when writing about amnesty, conspicuously avoiding any discussion of the various crimes the average working illegal alien commits. Many politicians have also embraced the myth of the otherwise law-abiding illegal alien in an effort to promote amnesty, arguing that illegal aliens are no threat to the United States.2

But the average illegal alien violates numerous statutes, often creating real victims.

This [report] details the many statutes the average illegal alien who is simply "here to work" may be violating. The violations include laws involving the entry, presence, and travel of illegal aliens as well as laws related to employment such as perjury and identity theft. Examples of oft-violated but under-enforced laws include:

False Personation of a U.S. Citizen (18 U.S.C. § 911). Illegal aliens often present themselves as U.S. citizens, an act punishable by up to five years in jail, a felony. This law is often cited in immigration prosecutions and may involve, for example, an alien claiming U.S. citizenship to his employer.

Fraud and False Statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001). It is common for illegal aliens to make false statements to the government or on official documents. An illegal alien violates this law when claiming to be a U.S. citizen on an I-9 Employment Eligibility form and faces a fine and up to five years imprisonment.

Social Security Fraud (42 U.S.C. § 408). This statute has been invoked where an illegal alien provided a false Social Security number for the purpose of acquiring a job, where an illegal alien used a fraudulent Social Security number for the purpose of acquiring a driver's license, and when an illegal alien used a Social Security card belonging to a citizen in order to obtain Section 8 housing, for example. Violation of this statute can result in a fine and/or imprisonment up to five years. The court can also require violators to provide restitution to the victims.

This [report] does not address crimes of violence, property crimes like vandalism, or other acts like gang activity and drunk driving. The focus is on statutes that come into play when a person enters the country illegally or overstays a visa and becomes employed.
>
The original application for the DACA amnesty did require applicants to list the Social Security numbers they had previously used; after amnesty advocates complained, the Obama administration removed the requirement, leaving the American victims — the true owners of the numbers — completely in the dark as to the crimes committed against them.11 Real victims have been created yet amnesty gives these violations a pass, putting the interests of the illegal alien before the interests of the U.S. citizen. This is a fact rarely addressed by amnesty advocates or journalists who perpetuate the myth of the otherwise law-abiding illegal alien.

It is important to remember that, ultimately, an amnesty is [Note: Unconstitutional and] a free pass not only for the basic immigration violations, but also a free pass for many other crimes committed during the alien's stay in the United States.
>
Discussion

The statutes below are grouped into four different sections. Section I focuses on laws involving the entry, presence, and travel of illegal aliens. Section II focuses on laws employed illegal aliens may be violating, including identity theft laws. Section III lists additional document laws that illegal aliens often violate. Finally, Section IV lists miscellaneous laws and addresses the issue of state law.

While the list below may seem lengthy, it is only a sampling of the statutes an average illegal alien may be violating. It is not to be interpreted as a comprehensive list. ...

Click for Full Text!


Poster Comment:

Continued at the site.Subscribe to *Illegal Immigration*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

#1. To: All (#0) (Edited)

Cross-referencing 4um Title: "Undocumented Immigrant" Is a Made-Up Term That Ignores the Law

Illegal alien is the correct legal term that should be used.

“Undocumented immigrant” is a politically correct, made-up term adopted by pro-illegal alien advocacy groups and liberal media outlets to obscure the fact that such aliens have violated U.S. immigration law and are in the country illegally.
>
The Justice Department has a constitutional duty to enforce the immigration laws passed by Congress against illegal aliens.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-05-20   21:43:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: All (#1) (Edited)

The Justice Department has a constitutional duty to enforce the immigration laws passed by Congress against illegal aliens.


This is not a law. It is a conflict of Immigration Law and has long been putting the safety of migrant children at risk:

Reno v. Flores - Wikipedia Ref.

On January 28, 1997, during the administration of President Bill Clinton, the parties agreed to a consent decree regarding immigration detention standards for children and in which the government agreed to keep children in the least restrictive setting possible and to ensure the prompt release of children from immigration detention. The settlement is officially called the Flores v. Reno Settlement Agreement ... officially abbreviated as the Flores Agreement. It is also unofficially referred to as the Flores Settlement and as the Flores v. Reno Agreement. ... On July 24, 2015, U.S. District Judge Dolly M. Gee of the Central District of California found that the consent decree applied equally to accompanied and unaccompanied minors and that immigration officials violated the consent decree by refusing to release accompanied minors held in a family detention facility. The court ordered the release of 1700 families that were not flight risks. The government said an average of 20 days was required for adjudication of "credible fear" and "reasonable fear" claims, among the grounds for asylum in the United States, and on August 21, 2015 Judge Gee clarified the "without unnecessary delay" and "promptly" language in the Flores settlement, ruling that holding parents and children for up to 20 days "may fall within the parameters" of the settlement.


The History of the Flores Settlement - Center for Immigration Studies/CIS Ref. | February 11, 2019


Recently reported: DNA Tests At Border Reveal 30% of "Family Members" Aren't Related - kprcradio, Houston | May 20, 2019

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-05-20   23:16:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 2.

#3. To: All (#2) (Edited)

Reno v. Flores - Wikipedia Ref.

The government said an average of 20 days was required for adjudication of "credible fear" and "reasonable fear" claims, among the grounds for asylum in the United States, and on August 21, 2015 Judge Gee clarified the "without unnecessary delay" and "promptly" language in the Flores settlement, ruling that holding [alleged] parents and children for up to 20 days "may fall within the parameters" of the settlement.


Twenty days is no longer an average estimate to process asylum claims properly because Central American migrants have been overwhelming the adjudication system, so they are being lawlessly released with court dates set for years later that many defy. That is grounds for Martial Law at our borders and no contrived "policy agreement" has the power to supersede our Immigration Laws.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-05-21 00:21:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]