[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
World News See other World News Articles Title: Trump shock: USA told it will LOSE WAR WITH IRAN, and here’s why Gulf of Oman: US ships 'targeted by missiles' says reporter Military threats and sabre-rattling rhetoric have littered dialogue between the two nations in recent months with Iran’s foreign minister warning the US just hours ago it “cannot expect to stay safe” while Donald Trump counter-warned any conflict would be “the end of Iran”. But military experts on both sides of the potential conflict know that despite a massive firepower advantage a USA victory is far from certain, especially accordng to one former ranking US Air Force strategist who now lives on the Straits of Hormuz. And here’s why – he writes: 1. Iran is a REALLY BIG COUNTRY – it is 3–4 times larger than Iraq, with a much larger population. 2. The terrain is more like Afghanistan, ringed with mountains, not deserts. It isn’t a good place for tanks to run amok. 3. Worse, the Strait of Hormuz is REALLY narrow, especially the shipping channel. Nearly all of it can be fired upon from Iran with short-range missiles or can be attacked from shore with small boats. There is NO WAY to try to sail tankers out during war times. 4. Iran is right – they probably CAN block the Strait in the event of war. No business wants to come under missile attack while in transit. Promoted Story President Trump has told acting Defence Secretary Patrick Shanahan that he does not want war with Iran but his hawkish national security advisor John Bolton is championing an aggressive military posture against Iran – which has long challenged the international community with thinly veiled desire to become a nuclear power. Donald Trump Donald Trump could NEVER beat Iran in a military conflict (Image: Getty) Strait of Hormuz Iranian army helicopters and Navy boats take part in manoeuvres in the Strait of Hormuz (Image: AFP/Getty) Secretary Shanahan has presented an military plan that includes sending as many as 120,000 ground troops to the Middle East if Iran attacks US forces or accelerates nuclear work. And in recent weeks the US has dispatched a carrier strike group and bomber task force to the region which the Pentagon says is a response to “heightened Iranian readiness to conduct offensive operations.” But the former flier, who now lives in the region, said US military intervention would be suicidal and added: “I think it is very, very likely that Iran can just out-wait the US. Sure, the US can strike them, and dominate the air. "But - even with Saudi help, it is just so large as a country – that the US cannot easily defeat it. “That will lead to an emboldened Iran, more committed to backing their Shiite government than ever. Not the best outcome – which is why the US military is VERY hesitant to start a war – it would likely be a very unconstrained affair, with no end date.” And he warned any conflict would spill over onto the streets of mainland USA with multiple terror attacks. He added: “Iran will undoubtedly use terrorism to strike the US if push came to shove. “It’s easy to be brave NOW, but the US isn’t under attack. If a real war happened, we would have MULTIPLE Shiite attacks on targets like Times Square, Mall of the Americas, Disneyland…. You get the idea. So does Iran. So does Hezbollah. US fifth navy The navy's Fifth Fleet area of operation includes Gulf waters off Iran (Image: JOSE JORDAN/AFP/Getty) “These attacks may take place YEARS after the war… literally. Kiss your freedom of movement goodbye, for YEARS. “I’m not sure any American would say that is a good trade-off.” Earlier today Iran was being blamed for attacks on two oil tankers off the coast of Iran in the Gulf of Oman. One was ablaze and the other reportedly sunk after a torpedo attack. The Bahrain-based US Navy Fifth Fleet said it was assisting the tankers after receiving distress calls and the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations, part of Britain's Royal Navy, said it was investigating with its partners. READ MORE: MELANIA TRUMP SAVAGED FOR 'RIDICULOUS' DOCUMENTARY USA v IRAN military firepower graphic Top gun: USA massively out punches Iran when it comes to military firepower (Image: DX) US FIREPOWER VS IRAN FIREPOWER Aircraft USA: 13,398 Iran: 509 Ships USA: 415 Iran: 398 Tanks and armour USA: 48,422 Iran: 3,979 Active Personnel USA: 1,281,900 Iran: 523,000 Most fearsome aircraft: IRAN: ‘Kowsar’ fighter aircraft - home built, based on 50-year-old US F-5 design USA: Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II - cost and capabilites mind-blowing Most fearsome Tanks: IRAN: Karrar - Iran claims among best in world, actually based on a 1970s Soviet T-72 USA: M1A2 SEP - incredible technology and armour one of the most feared main battle tanks. Most fearsome ships: IRAN: IS Alvand - mid—class frigate with 60s technology USA: USS Gerald R. Ford - a floating city armed to the teeth, carrying 75 attack aircraft Poster Comment: No mention of Iran's superior missiles. They have Mach 14 IRBMs and SRBMs. US does not. They have an unstoppable cruise missile with a range of 800 miles. US does not. They have advanced drones courtesy of the CIA. Those drones can launch missiles and drop bombs. The US would lose all of their ships in the Persian Gulf and all military bases in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Kuwait and probably Diego Garcia as well. You know he is pumping up the US side when he mentions the F-35 and the USS Gerald Ford as assets. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Horse (#0)
(Edited)
The Israelis have already knocked out the Iranian nuclear facilities. As shown in the map, they took the northern route direct to the site after they had obtained intelligence the Iranians were on the verge of having that site go critical. This is the same as they did to the Osirak reactor in Iraq. ;) media.voltron.voanews.com...6/styles/sourced/s3/2019- 04/5D61B9AE-AFE1-40CC-B7D0-27105D9FE7A0.png
#2. To: BTP Holdings (#1)
BS. There never was an Iranian nuclear weapons project. They do have nuclear facilities deep underground. Any successful attack would have been obvious to any nation that owns satellites. And that alleged nuclear facility in Iraq was not making nuclear weapons.
Had a weird dream about a BTP Holdings a few nights ago. Never met the man, don't know his real name, don't want to, but there was a rickety bridge and we had to knock the rodents clear of their pods into the river or they would just grow back! Yikes! God I hate hotel pillows.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||
