[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Editorial See other Editorial Articles Title: Debunking the rumors about Russia caving in to Israel Saker... This Spring saw a sudden increase in the volume of articles in the so-called alternative media and blogosphere about Putin selling out Syria or Iran to the Israelis and their US patrons, or both. What was particularly interesting about this campaign is that it was not triggered by any kind of event or statement by Putin or any other senior Russian decision-makers. True, Israeli politicians made numerous trips to Russia, but each time they walked away without anything tangible to show for their efforts. As for their Russian counterparts, they limited themselves to vague and well-intentioned statements. Nonetheless, the Putin sold out to Netanyahu campaign did not stop. Every meeting was systematically interpreted as The Clear Proof that the Zionists control the Kremlin and that Putin was doing Netanyahus bidding. The fact that this campaign began ex nihilo did not seem to bother most observers. Soon I started getting steady streams of emails asking me to react to these articles. My reply was always the same one: lets do the opposite of what these supposed specialists are doing and wait for the facts to come out and only then form an opinion. Truth be told, I had already tackled that canard in my article Why is Putin allowing Israel to bomb Syria. I also had tried to debunk some of the most persistent and toxic falsehoods about Russia and Israel in my article Putin and Israel: A Complex and Multi-Layered Relationship. I also wrote an article entitled Is Putin Really Ready to Ditch Iran? trying to debunk that stupid theory. Finally, I even tried to compare and contrast the Russian approach towards Israel (which I qualified as self-interest) with the attitude of the collective West (which I qualified as prostitution) in an article entitled Russia, Israel and the Values of Western Civilization Where Is the Truth?. I was naïve to think that any of my arguments would elicit any doubts amongst the Putin is a traitor crowd. After all, if being wrong for years could not convince them otherwise, no rational argument would. Then, news agencies began to report that General Nikolai Patrushev, the Director of the Russian Federal Security Service and the Secretary of the Security Council of Russia, would travel to Israel to meet with John Bolton and Bibi Netanyahu. At this point, the steady stream of concerned emails suddenly turned into a deluge! After all, why would such a high-ranking (and rather secretive) Russian official travel to Israel to meet two of the worst and most evil politicians of the Anglo-Zionist Empire? Surely, he had something important to say, no? The consensus (of sorts) was that Patrushev would sell out Iran and Syria in exchange for some (entirely theoretical, quite unlikely and inevitably vague) concessions on the Ukraine, Crimea or sanctions. My reply remained the same. Lets wait until these folks actually meet and lets see if their meeting brings about something significant (as a rule, I find getting facts an essential first step before engaging in any analysis; apparently, my detractors feel otherwise). So, again, I decided to wait. Then something weird happened: the meeting took place, it was even reported (albeit mostly in general terms), the participants issued their statements and
nothing. The outcome of the Jerusalem summit was greeted by a deafening silence and a few vapid commentaries. My first hunch was that, as the Russian saying goes, the mountain had given birth to a mouse and that nothing of importance came out of the summit. Boy, was I ever wrong! The official Russian position on Iran The summit *did* indeed produce something of vital significance, but for some reason, the most senior-official statement on Iran that any Russian decision-maker ever made received very little attention. Unless you happened to be a Saker blog reader, you would never find out about it. See for yourself and click here: thesaker.is/russias-patrushev-holds-press-conference-following-russia-us-israeli-talks/ for both the video and the transcript. To my knowledge, this is the only full-length English language transcript of Patrushevs statement. (Ruptly posted a video dubbed in English, but it was hardly noticed. As for the transcript, to my knowledge it was never reposted in full). Which is too bad, since the following words have now been spoken by one of the most authorized and high-ranking Russian officials to date: (emphasis added) We have emphasized an importance of easing of the tensions for the country (Syria) between Israel and Iran, by the way of implementation the mutual approaching steps. We have made an emphasis that Syria must not be turned into an arena for geopolitical confrontation. We have also highlighted the need for the international community to help Syria to rebuild its national economy. Among other things, Syria should be free of illegal trade restrictions, unilateral sanctions, as well as sanctions on economic operators that help Syria to rebuild. They also have to be free from all sanctions. We also turned everyones attention to the relations of Syria and other Arab states that should be normalized again. Syria is once again should be a full-fledged member of the Arab League. Also, we pointed out an importance of establishing the contacts of Syrian government with its Kurdish ethnic minority. We stated of importance to unite the efforts to eliminate all remaining in Syria terrorists. We called for immediate disruption of all channels through which terrorists might be able to obtain weapon grade chemical materials and their precursors. Russia, the United States and Israel should join their efforts to help peace to return to Syria. In the context of the statements made by our partners with regard to a major regional power, namely Iran, I would like to say the following: Iran has always been and remains our ally and partner, with which we are consistently developing relations both on bilateral basis and within multilateral formats, This is why we believe that it is inadmissible to describe Iran as the major threat to the regional security and, moreover, to put it on par with the Islamic State or any other terrorist organization, Especially, since Iran contributes substantial efforts to bring peace to Syria and to stabilize the situation in Syria. We have called on our partners to show restraint and readiness for reciprocal steps, which must serve as the basis for the consistent advancement towards the easing of tensions in the Israeli-Iranian relations To my knowledge, this is the very first time that Russia has officially declared Iran not only as a partner but as an ally! A few days later, President Putin confirmed that this was an official position which had his imprimatur when he stated in his interview to the FT that: We have established sufficiently good business-like relations with all regional countries, and our positions in the Middle East region have become more stable. Indeed, we have established very good, business-like, partner-like and largely allied relations with many regional countries, including Iran, Turkey and other countries This is absolutely huge, especially considering that, unlike Eltsins democratic Russia or western politicians, Putin does not abandon his allies (if anything, he sometimes defends them for too long even when they have been found guilty of dishonorable actions). Let me repeat this: Russia has declared that Iran is her *ally*. The official Russian position on Syria Next, lets parse the Patrushev statement once again for some specifics about Syria: Israel does not get to impose its will upon Syria. (Syria must not be turned into an arena for geopolitical confrontation ). All sanctions against Syria must be lifted. (Syria should be free of illegal trade restrictions, unilateral sanctions, as well as sanctions on economic operators that help Syria to rebuild. They also have to be free from all sanctions). The Arab League must fully reinstate Syria. (Syria once again should be a fully-fledged member of the Arab League). All the remaining terrorists in Syria must be eliminated. (unite the efforts to eliminate all remaining terrorists in Syria). It sure looks to me that Russias commitment to Syrias integrity and freedom is as strong as ever. Does that look to you like Russia and Israel are working hand-in-hand in Syria? If so, please read the following for a quick reality check (excerpt from this article): The initial AngloZionist plan was to overthrow Assad and replace him with the Takfiri crazies (Daesh, al-Qaeda, al-Nusra, ISIS call them whatever you want). Doing this would achieve the following goals: Bring down a strong secular Arab state along with its political structure, armed forces, and security services. Create total chaos and horror in Syria justifying the creation of a security zone by Israel not only in the Golan but further north. Trigger a civil war in Lebanon by unleashing the Takfiri crazies against Hezbollah. Let the Takfiris and Hezbollah bleed each other to death, then create a security zone, but this time in Lebanon. Prevent the creation of a Shia axis Iran-Iraq-Syria-Lebanon. Break up Syria along ethnic and religious lines. Create a Kurdistan which could then be used against Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Iran. Make it possible for Israel to become the uncontested power broker in the Middle-East and force the KSA, Qatar, Oman, Kuwait, and all others to have to go to Israel for any gas or oil pipeline project. Gradually isolate, threaten, subvert, and eventually attack Iran with a broad regional coalition of forces. Eliminate all center of Shia power in the Middle-East. That was an ambitious plan, but the Israelis felt pretty confident that their US vassal-state would provide the resources needed to achieve it. Now this entire plan has collapsed due to the very high effectiveness of an informal but yet formidable alliance between Russia, Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah. To say that the Israelis are seething with rage and in a state of total panic would be an understatement. Do you think I am exaggerating? Then look at it from the Israeli point of view: The Syrian state has survived, and its armed and security forces are now far more capable than they were before the war started (remember how they *almost* lost the war initially? The Syrians bounced back while learning some very hard lessons. By all reports, they improved tremendously, while at critical moments Iran and Hezbollah were literally plugging holes in the Syrian frontlines and extinguishing fires on local flashpoints. Now the Syrians are doing a very good job of liberating large chunks of their country, including every single city in Syria). Not only is Syria stronger, but the Iranians and Hezbollah are all over the country now, which is driving the Israelis into a state of panic and rage. Lebanon is rock solid; even the latest Saudi attempt to kidnap Hariri is backfiring. Syria will remain unitary, and Kurdistan is not happening. Millions of displaced refugees are returning home. Israel and the US look like total idiots and, even worse, as losers with no credibility left. The simple truth is that Russia foiled *ALL* the Israeli plans for Syria. All of them! Poster Comment: Reply FB Good article
however, the author is clearly not professionally conversant in even the basics of air combat
the idea that there are not enough S300s and S400s to enforce Anti Access Area Denial zones in Syrias most sensitive airspace is nonsensical to a professional air combat practitioner
those Israeli strikes are carried out from outside Syrian airspace
Moreover
the Israeli combat aircraft have not tried to target S300 radars or launchers
they simply do not have effective weapons for that job
in fact no one does
which is why USAF supremo Breedlove has noted in frustration that entirely new weapons need to be developed to counter those mobile high end SAMs
and these would be need to be ground based, not airborne
for reason of physics
aircraft carried missiles that home in on air defense radars have short range
only about one quarter the range of S300/400 anti aircraft missiles
so there exists no possibility of getting close enough to take a shot
Also useless to mention aircraft and missile RCS, radar cross section
this doesnt work
I have explained these technicalities in depth on previous occasions
Now the simple fact is that lobbing missiles from outside Syrian airspace is simply PR
you cant intercept every missile
so some fixed targets are inevitably hit
but this has nothing to do with the battle of attacking aircraft versus air defense systems
the Russian air defense technology and operational doctrine has made this a no contest
there is no way on earth to take out those S300s and S400s
even if there are only a few of them
even if overwhelmed by an onslaught of hundreds of aircraft they go into quiet mode and move around
and then they pick off targets of opportunity
this is the reality of todays air combat
airplanes cant win
Tatarewicz...More likely Israel made an under-the-table deal to supply Russia with critical US intelligence. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tatarewicz (#0)
So if russia rigged the elections, and russia sold out to israel , does that mean Israel controls our elections?
______________________________________ Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|