[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Russia's Dark Future

A Missile Shield for America - A Trillion Dollar Fantasy?

Kentucky School Board Chairman Resigns After Calling for People to ‘Shoot Republicans’

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Roberts reveals himself as part of the swamp
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://digital.olivesoftware.com/Ol ... =Ar06301&sk=62A8DC73&mode=text
Published: Jul 10, 2019
Author: WAYNE ALLYN ROOT
Post Date: 2019-07-10 12:15:17 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 1217
Comments: 28

THE deck is stacked. The fix is in. The Democrat Party, D.C. swamp, Deep State, globalists, socialists, various special interest groups and a few bought and sold RINO Republicans are giving your country away, day by day, hour by hour, inch by inch.

This is about unbridled greed. Open borders are making a select few powerful billionaires, companies and special-interests wealthier, handing power to Democrats and making big government far bigger.

Think. Who makes money off keeping the illegal alien invasion coming? Mexican drug cartels, drug traffickers, human traffickers, big government, the welfare state, the Democrat Party. Staying in power, keeping their jobs. It’s a racket. A scam. It’s all about the Benjamins.

Exhibit A: Mexican officials just sent 15,000 troops to their border with the United States to slow the illegal alien invasion. They’ve also sent thousands of military troops to their southern border. In one foul swoop, Mexico did more to protect America and American-born citizens than the Democrat Party has in history.

And if Democrats can’t ensure the fix is in, there’s always Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court. He’s clearly the ace in the hole for the Deep State and D.C. swamp. He’s their last line of defense.

On Thursday, the court ruled President Donald Trump couldn’t include a simple citizenship question on the 2020 census. A question. Illegals are now “untouchables.” They are protected in “sanctuary cities.” They are given benefits American citizens can’t get. Now you can’t ask them a question on a census. They are the ultimate privileged class. Someone is obviously making a lot of money on this scam. And I’ll bet they’re willing to pay a lot to keep it going.

Enter Justice Roberts, a supposed “constitutional conservative.” Something smells rotten.

Remember, Roberts was the deciding vote to save Obamacare. He changed his mind from a “no” vote to kill Obamacare to a “yes” vote to save Obamacare. Who changes their mind about the most important decision in modern American history? What “constitutional conservative” decides to support the biggest government leviathan in history?

The tipoff was his reasoning. Obama’s own lawyers argued Obamacare was not a tax. Roberts justified saving Obamacare by arguing it was a tax. Well if it was a tax, it’s unconstitutional. How do I know? Because that’s precisely why Obama’s lawyers argued it wasn’t a tax. Roberts ignored the Constitution to save Obamacare.

Fast forward to Thursday. Roberts did the unimaginable again. He voted with liberals to remove a simple question on the census that even he declared was constitutional. A question asked by countries all over the world. More twisting like a pretzel to benefit the Deep State.

Roberts’ ruling affects trillions of dollars. Liberals argued asking the question would give an advantage to legal Americans and Republicans. But by voting to remove the citizenship question, Roberts now gives advantage to illegal aliens and Mexican drug cartels over law-abiding, taxpaying American citizens.

He gives an advantage to the Democrat Party over Republicans. He gives an advantage to blue states for federal funding and future electoral votes. Trillions in money and power just changed hands.

Roberts’ vote makes big government bigger and the Democrat Party more powerful. It leaves American-born taxpayers paying higher taxes. Roberts’ ruling changes the future direction of America. Trust me, this is all about the Benjamins.

Folks, the deck is stacked. The fix is in. The bad guys are giving your country away.

Contact Wayne Allyn Root at Wayne@ROOTforAmerica.com. Hear or watch the nationally syndicated “WAR Now: The Wayne Allyn Root Show” from 3 to 6 p.m. daily at 790 Talk Now and at 5 p.m. on Newsmax TV.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

#6. To: Ada (#0) (Edited)

Obama’s own lawyers argued Obamacare was not a tax. Roberts justified saving Obamacare by arguing it was a tax. ... Roberts ignored the Constitution

That move by Roberts was Taxation without Representation + no legislation at all is supposed to originate at the Supreme Court -- much less "presto change-o" tax levy legislation, which that law wasn't except in Roberts' jurisdictional-overstepping imagination. His decision should have been disqualified on those grounds and he probably should have been impeached to remove him from the bench because of his Judiciary power-grabbing ploy:

Origination Clause - Wikipedia

This clause says that all bills for raising revenue [i.e. tax levies] must start in the House of Representatives [as such], but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as in the case of other bills. ... This clause resonated with a citizenry opposed to taxation without representation.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-09-30   14:14:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GreyLmist, All (#6)

When you have time you might read about Justice Owen Roberts and what he did for FDR.

It is interesting reading. The swamp was covering the swamp.

Cynicom  posted on  2019-09-30   14:40:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Cynicom (#7) (Edited)

When you have time you might read about Justice Owen Roberts and what he did for FDR.

It is interesting reading. The swamp was covering the swamp.

Thank you for suggesting that SCOTUS topic. I would like to know more about the FDR era of it. Yesterday, during my Sierra Club researchings, I found that [FDR nominee] Justice William O. Douglas argued that trees, etc. of earth's ecology should have plaintiff-standing to sue in court. [Ref. Section 3.5 "Trees have standing" at the linked Wikipedia page.]

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-09-30   16:08:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: GreyLmist (#9)

trees, etc. of earth's ecology should have plaintiff-standing to sue in court.

This is interesting that an inanimate object would be given the standing to sue in court.

But when you consider that corporations being similar inanimate objects having the standing to sue in court, it makes perfect sense. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-09-30   16:48:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: BTP Holdings (#11) (Edited)

trees, etc. of earth's ecology should have plaintiff-standing to sue in court.

This is interesting that an inanimate object would be given the standing to sue in court.

But when you consider that corporations being similar inanimate objects having the standing to sue in court, it makes perfect sense. ;)

I don't agree that corporations have "personhood" standing or that their money donations to political campaigns should be considered a "personhood" Freedom of Speech issue for them. Evidence that their supposed "personhood standing" is a fiction can be seen everytime they donate more money to political campaigns than the limited amount that one actual human person is restricted by law from exceeding at the threat of prison. Ref. Dinesh D'Souza. "Justice" William O. Douglas who basically claimed in the (1972) Sierra Club v. Morton case that even minerals should have standing, when he said that the lawsuit "would therefore be more properly labeled as Mineral King v. Morton", is the same "Justice" William O. Douglas who sided the very next year with the Roe v. Wade (1973) majority that denied personhood status for fetal humans and declared it to be against the "law" for the State to even have a compelling interest in preserving their life before the later pre-birth development stages.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-10-01   2:00:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 18.

#21. To: GreyLmist (#18)

corporations have "personhood" standing

Corporations are fictions of law, just as the Strawman is a fiction of law. They both need a live human to talk in their stead. Why do you think someone who is not a lawyer cannot address the court unless the judge speaks to them? Of course the judge never does. The judge always addresses the lawyer. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-10-01 06:24:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]