[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump is about to change EVERYTHING and THIS is why they want him dead

I asked chatGPT to tell me what one of KamalaÂ’s speeches was about.

This Is A New World Where The Most Powerful Players Are Not Bankers, But Politicians, Their Deficits And Debts

W.O. Taylor Eyewitness Report Reveals Shocking Truth Of Custer’s Last Stand

America's Legendary Marine Sniper - Carlos "White Feather" Hathcock

Van Damme on Arsenio Hall (Universal Soldier) Part 2

Steven Seagal : Fight scene Above the Law (Baseball bat scene)

Really Funny Inappropriate, Sexist, Chauvinistic, Misogynistic Memes Jokes Cartoons

ALERT: GDP Only Half the Story (why trouble is ahead)

Panic In Israel As Hezbollah Expands Attack Strategy, Changes Targets: '2 Million Israelis At Risk'

Why Does Kamala Harris Keep Repeating This Quote? - (Karl Marx Origins)

Re-Visiting Deagel 2025 Population Forecast: An Accidental Warning?

NHS Whistleblower: We Were Instructed to Euthanize Patients to Inflate COVID Death Toll While Hospitals Sat Empty!

America Obliterates Half North Vietnam's MiG-21 Fleet In 13 Minutes - Operation Bolo

Fully Autistic at 3 but by age 6 he was symptom-free and back to being a normal kid

We Are at War, You Got An Enemy, Stop Depending on Your Enemy (Money Laundering)

A mass shooting in Birmingham, Alabama’s Five Points South left 4 dead, 25 injured,

Brilliant takedown of how lost the Democratic Party is from a former Democrat

KY Sheriff Shot Judge because Judge was R*ping his Daughter

Arrested by Kamala: A Black Mother's Story

Israeli Media Fear Houthis Have Arrived on Israel's Border as Militia Touts Readiness for 'Long War'

KAMALA’S AMERICA: Violent Squatters Take Over Massive Mansion in Wealthy Los Angeles Neighborhood

Walk/Don't-Walk - In Which States Do Citizens Stroll The Most?

U.S. Poverty Myth EXPOSED! New Census Report Is Shocking Capitol Hill

August layoffs soared to 15-year high, marking a 193% increase from July.

NYPD Faces Uncertain Future Amid New York's Growing Political Crisis

Whitney Webb: Foreign Intelligence Affiliated CTI League Poses Major National Security Risk

Paul Joseph Watson: What Fresh Hell Is This?

Watch: 50 Kids Loot 7-Eleven In Beverly Hills For Candy & Snacks

"No Americans": Insider Of Alleged Trafficking Network Reveals How Migrants Ended Up At Charleroi, PA Factory


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Roberts reveals himself as part of the swamp
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://digital.olivesoftware.com/Ol ... =Ar06301&sk=62A8DC73&mode=text
Published: Jul 10, 2019
Author: WAYNE ALLYN ROOT
Post Date: 2019-07-10 12:15:17 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 871
Comments: 28

THE deck is stacked. The fix is in. The Democrat Party, D.C. swamp, Deep State, globalists, socialists, various special interest groups and a few bought and sold RINO Republicans are giving your country away, day by day, hour by hour, inch by inch.

This is about unbridled greed. Open borders are making a select few powerful billionaires, companies and special-interests wealthier, handing power to Democrats and making big government far bigger.

Think. Who makes money off keeping the illegal alien invasion coming? Mexican drug cartels, drug traffickers, human traffickers, big government, the welfare state, the Democrat Party. Staying in power, keeping their jobs. It’s a racket. A scam. It’s all about the Benjamins.

Exhibit A: Mexican officials just sent 15,000 troops to their border with the United States to slow the illegal alien invasion. They’ve also sent thousands of military troops to their southern border. In one foul swoop, Mexico did more to protect America and American-born citizens than the Democrat Party has in history.

And if Democrats can’t ensure the fix is in, there’s always Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court. He’s clearly the ace in the hole for the Deep State and D.C. swamp. He’s their last line of defense.

On Thursday, the court ruled President Donald Trump couldn’t include a simple citizenship question on the 2020 census. A question. Illegals are now “untouchables.” They are protected in “sanctuary cities.” They are given benefits American citizens can’t get. Now you can’t ask them a question on a census. They are the ultimate privileged class. Someone is obviously making a lot of money on this scam. And I’ll bet they’re willing to pay a lot to keep it going.

Enter Justice Roberts, a supposed “constitutional conservative.” Something smells rotten.

Remember, Roberts was the deciding vote to save Obamacare. He changed his mind from a “no” vote to kill Obamacare to a “yes” vote to save Obamacare. Who changes their mind about the most important decision in modern American history? What “constitutional conservative” decides to support the biggest government leviathan in history?

The tipoff was his reasoning. Obama’s own lawyers argued Obamacare was not a tax. Roberts justified saving Obamacare by arguing it was a tax. Well if it was a tax, it’s unconstitutional. How do I know? Because that’s precisely why Obama’s lawyers argued it wasn’t a tax. Roberts ignored the Constitution to save Obamacare.

Fast forward to Thursday. Roberts did the unimaginable again. He voted with liberals to remove a simple question on the census that even he declared was constitutional. A question asked by countries all over the world. More twisting like a pretzel to benefit the Deep State.

Roberts’ ruling affects trillions of dollars. Liberals argued asking the question would give an advantage to legal Americans and Republicans. But by voting to remove the citizenship question, Roberts now gives advantage to illegal aliens and Mexican drug cartels over law-abiding, taxpaying American citizens.

He gives an advantage to the Democrat Party over Republicans. He gives an advantage to blue states for federal funding and future electoral votes. Trillions in money and power just changed hands.

Roberts’ vote makes big government bigger and the Democrat Party more powerful. It leaves American-born taxpayers paying higher taxes. Roberts’ ruling changes the future direction of America. Trust me, this is all about the Benjamins.

Folks, the deck is stacked. The fix is in. The bad guys are giving your country away.

Contact Wayne Allyn Root at Wayne@ROOTforAmerica.com. Hear or watch the nationally syndicated “WAR Now: The Wayne Allyn Root Show” from 3 to 6 p.m. daily at 790 Talk Now and at 5 p.m. on Newsmax TV.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#6. To: Ada (#0) (Edited)

Obama’s own lawyers argued Obamacare was not a tax. Roberts justified saving Obamacare by arguing it was a tax. ... Roberts ignored the Constitution

That move by Roberts was Taxation without Representation + no legislation at all is supposed to originate at the Supreme Court -- much less "presto change-o" tax levy legislation, which that law wasn't except in Roberts' jurisdictional-overstepping imagination. His decision should have been disqualified on those grounds and he probably should have been impeached to remove him from the bench because of his Judiciary power-grabbing ploy:

Origination Clause - Wikipedia

This clause says that all bills for raising revenue [i.e. tax levies] must start in the House of Representatives [as such], but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as in the case of other bills. ... This clause resonated with a citizenry opposed to taxation without representation.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-09-30   14:14:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GreyLmist, All (#6)

When you have time you might read about Justice Owen Roberts and what he did for FDR.

It is interesting reading. The swamp was covering the swamp.

Cynicom  posted on  2019-09-30   14:40:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Cynicom (#7) (Edited)

When you have time you might read about Justice Owen Roberts and what he did for FDR.

It is interesting reading. The swamp was covering the swamp.


Owen Roberts - Wikipedia

Roosevelt's long presidency allowed him to appoint most of the [Supreme Court]. By the end of Roberts's tenure, he was the lone Supreme Court Justice who was not appointed by Roosevelt. ... On the Hughes Court, Roberts was a swing vote ... [His] vote often decided whether President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal legislation would be upheld. ... Roberts was appointed by Roosevelt to head the commission investigating the attack on Pearl Harbor; his report was published in 1942 and was highly critical of the US military. ... Roberts had been one of the most clamorous among those screaming for an open declaration of war. [He] demanded that we immediately unite with Great Britain in a single nation. The Pearl Harbor incident had given him what he had been yelling for – America's entrance into the war. ... Roberts dissented from the Court's decision upholding internment of Japanese-Americans along the West Coast in 1944's Korematsu v. United States. ... [He] became frustrated with the willingness of the new justices to overturn precedent and with what he saw as their result-oriented liberalism as judges [but] overruled an opinion that had been written 19 years earlier by [himself]. ... Roberts retired from the Court the following year, in 1945; Roberts's relations with his colleagues had become so strained that fellow Justice Hugo Black refused to sign the customary letter acknowledging Roberts's service on his retirement. Other justices refused to sign a modified letter that would have been acceptable to Black, and in the end, no letter was ever sent. Shortly after leaving the Court, Roberts reportedly burned all of his legal and judicial papers. As a result, there is no significant collection of Roberts' manuscript papers, as there is for most other modern Justices.


Pearl Harbor, 75 years on - Washington Times [Note: PC maneuverability issues there - graphics overload, imo]

Excerpts:

In short, the Japanese were fascinated by the British surprise airstrike at Taranto, which destroyed the Italian Fleet primarily by dropping torpedoes in relatively shallow water. ... The U.K. raid on Taranto became the blueprint for the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.
>
Of the eight official inquiries, the most biased conducted was by Supreme Court Justice Owen Roberts shortly following the attack. Neither Adm. Husband E. Kimmel, the commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet, or Lt. Gen. Walter Short, who was responsible for the defense of Hawaii, received any information from the decrypted codes which would have alerted them to the Japanese fleet’s intentions. Yet the Roberts commission declared Adm. Kimmel and Lt. Gen. Short derelict in carrying their duties and held them solely responsible for the Pearl Harbor disaster. None of the 10 Washington officials authorized to receive the decrypted information was held accountable. Cover up?


A very heinous cover up.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-10-01   0:03:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: GreyLmist (#16)

Of the eight official inquiries, the most biased conducted was by Supreme Court Justice Owen Roberts shortly following the attack. Neither Adm. Husband E. Kimmel, the commander in chief of the Pacific Fleet, or Lt. Gen. Walter Short, who was responsible for the defense of Hawaii, received any information from the decrypted codes which would have alerted them to the Japanese fleet’s intentions. Yet the Roberts commission declared Adm. Kimmel and Lt. Gen. Short derelict in carrying their duties and held them solely responsible for the Pearl Harbor disaster. None of the 10 Washington officials authorized to receive the decrypted information was held accountable. Cover up?

Very good, excellent. You did your homework.

Justice Roberts was "assigned" the job of clearing FDR and hanging the military.

He did just that in...30...days. Imagine that???? An investigation in 30 days as to who was to blame for a war????

I have not checked to see that Roberts is related to the current loser justice.

Cynicom  posted on  2019-10-01   6:10:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 20.

#26. To: Cynicom (#20) (Edited)

Justice [Owen] Roberts was "assigned" the job of clearing FDR and [blaming] the military.

He did just that in...30...days. Imagine that???? An investigation in 30 days as to who was to blame for a war????

I have not checked to see that [Owen Josephus] Roberts is related to the current ["Chief justice" John Glover Roberts, Jr.].

: [

I could only confirm that those SCOTUS Roberts are from the neighboring States of Pennsylvania and New York and that something they do appear to have in common is switching their votes for political impact rather than Constitutional law reasoning. I did find this about Owen Roberts:

Will Democrats Regret Weaponizing the Judiciary? - by Matthew Pritchard | politico.com | September 24, 2018

Despite the blow his reputation would take, [Justice Owen Roberts] began to side with the [FDR] administration in virtually all the cases that came before the court, often reversing votes he had cast just a few terms before. The message was clear: The court would no longer get in the [Democrat] president’s way.


Am archiving this article here about John Roberts similarly, with emphasis on the "Obamacare" tax issue:

Did John Roberts Switch His Vote? - by Paul Campos | Salon | June 29, 2012

The first "switch in time" also involved a Justice Roberts -- Owen Roberts, who in 1937 suddenly switched his vote in a case whose outcome signaled the end of a five-vote majority that was blocking much of the Roosevelt administration's New Deal. [Fast-Forward ...]
>
Rumors had been circulating in legal circles for weeks that Chief Justice [John] Roberts in particular was under enormous political pressure not to be the vote that would overturn the most significant piece of social legislation passed by Congress in decades. Indeed, in April President Obama took the unusual step of issuing something of a public warning on the subject, saying that he was "confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress."
>
It is impossible for a lawyer to read even the first few pages of the dissent without coming away with the impression that this is a majority opinion that at the last moment lost its fifth vote.
>
as the following passage makes clear:

Finally, we must observe that rewriting §5000A as a tax in order to sustain its constitutionality would force us to confront a difficult constitutional question: whether this is a direct tax that must be apportioned among the States according to their population. Art. I, §9, cl. 4. Perhaps it is not (we have no need to address the point); ... [They] are saying that construing the mandate as a tax would require them to address a constitutional question that they don't have to address. But the only reason the Court would not have to address this question is if the majority in fact refused to construe the mandate as a tax

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-10-01 16:31:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]