See other Religion Articles
Title: Voters Deciding Whether To Recall Official Over Pledge(refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance before board meetings.)
Source:
denver channel 7
URL Source: http://www.thedenverchannel.com/new ... .html?subid=22100484&qs=1;bp=t
Published: Mar 23, 2005
Author: ap/wire
Post Date: 2005-03-23 11:05:29 by hfrancis
Keywords: Pledge(refused, Allegiance, meetings.)
Views: 254
Comments: 26
TheDenverChannel.com Voters Deciding Whether To Recall Official Over Pledge Estes Park Recall Election Generating Lot Of Interest POSTED: 8:46 am MST March 22, 2005 UPDATED: 9:31 am MST March 22, 2005 A recall election is scheduled in Estes Park Tuesday for a town trustee who has refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance before board meetings. David Habecker sits while others stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. David Habecker, 59, refuses to stand and say the pledge because of the phrase "under God." He said the phrase violates his religious convictions and invites religion into a government function, violating the U.S. Constitution. Those who signed the recall petition said Habecker's position on the pledge should have been disclosed before he ran for public office. "His action as a personal protest is not what we want as a representative. He's taking a personal stand as an elected official," said Richard Clark, who has pushed for the recall. "We the people believe that his actions and his verbage do not represent us as citizens for a responsible government." However, Habecker said it wasn't an issue before because the pledge was just added to the trustees' agenda early last year. The board began reciting the pledge before meetings at the suggestion of Trustee Lori Jeffrey-Clark, calling it a way to show respect for the country during wartime. SURVEY Should a town trustee be recalled because he refuses to stand up and say the Pledge of Allegiance during Town Board meetings? Yes. No. Results | Disclaimer Habecker, who's served on the Town Board for 12 years, said he doesn't oppose the meaning of the pledge, and considers himself a patriot. However, he's also agnostic. "I do not believe that this book, that this God, that this country is under that God. I believe the framers of the Constitution had a separation there," said Habecker. "I'm sad for the community, that there is that much intolerance in our community. But if the people want to have a voice in what's going on, this is their way of doing it." Four candidates are vying to replace Habecker if he's voted out. The election is generating huge interest, with 280 absentee ballots already sent out. Town Clerk Vickie O'Connor said a typical Estes Park election draws about 60 absentee ballots out of 4,000 registered voters. More Information: Town of Estes Park Previous Stories: March 3, 2005: Recall Election Over Pledge Of Allegiance Reinstated February 11, 2005: Town Official Who Won't Recite Pledge Won't Face Recall Yet December 15, 2004: Recall Election Set For Trustee Who Won't Stand For Pledge Copyright 2005 by TheDenverChannel.com. The Associated Press contributed to this report. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: hfrancis (#0)
"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several State legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."
This is typical funlessmentalcase Christian BS. The pledge makes itself a target for being a deliberate foot in the door to try to leverage in unwanted religiousity. I have not said the pledge since my freshman year in high school. I refused to stand at first because of anger over the illegal and immoral war in Vietnam, and do not say it now precisely for the reason this gentleman will not. It imposes religion where it shouldn't, and should be dropped from use or have "under God" striken from it.
Heck, it's absurd even without the abominable "Under God" part. Civilized people should not be pledging fealty to a flag or to a nation, but rather to the principles of freedom, liberty and individual rights. Of course, people take their pledge of allegiance just about as seriously as they do their wedding vows.
I don't say the socialist pledge either, but not for the same reason. (I don't like the "one nation" stuff.) Adding "Under God" to the pledge was like installing a $1,000 stereo in a rusted out Yugo.
Tell me about it. I was physically manhandled for not standing for it in on post movie theaters while on active duty by fellow patrons who felt they could compel me to comply with their bullying. They were wrong of course. But I did start to wait in the lobby for that part to be over as not to have to deal with such pigheadedness. I had raised my right hand and had pledged an oath as a serviceman and had been permitted to excluded the "so help me God" part which I always did when taking it. I damn sure didn't need to do the pledge of allegiance to watch Easy Rider for the hundredth time at an on post movie house. The pledge is pointless, I quite agree. I never will say it again, even at the point of a gun.
And I'm sure the Goddess appreciates your loyalty to her, CWRWinger.
You mean the "Statue of Liberty"?
No, the creator, the Goddess. I am of Wicca. Let the blessings be.
Oh, just another yankee forum poster.
Fuck you, toothless.
Nah, I hate the Yankees. I'm a Red Sox fan. ;-D
Not nice to insult West Virginians, one of your own. They fought with the yankees, ya know. BTW, they seceded from Virginia. The yankees supported their secession because W.V.'s were a part of the welfare cult.
1. To: Badeye, Cal, Trace21230, medved, Ghost of Quantrill, BrerRabbit, USConservative (#0) Just a he had the right NOT to say the pledge, and the citizens had the right to boot his ass off the council ping ... Magic posted on 2005-03-23 10:50:33 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. To: Magic (#0) refused to say pledge Good. Throw his ass out. Some people seem to think free speech means freedom from any and all consequences of the speech. Ghost of Quantrill posted on 2005-03-23 11:25:56 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. To: Magic (#0) The recall election garnered state and national attention. Habecker, an agnostic, claimed saying the phrase "under God" in the Pledge violated the separation of church and state. That's likely what got him the boot. He made it about religion, not freedom of speech. Homeier, who voted against Habecker, said many residents did not appreciate Habecker using his position on the town board to voice his political views. He's a politician, what else is he supposed to express his views on? Cooking? duckhunter posted on 2005-03-23 11:32:43 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. To: duckhunter (#3) He's a politician, what else is he supposed to express his views on? Cooking? Perhaps the town business to which he had been elected in the first place? Just a random thought ... The political version of "shut up and sing". Magic posted on 2005-03-23 11:34:07 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. To: duckhunter (#3) politician Serving on a town board is apples and oranges to taking a stand on the pledge of allegiance. Ghost of Quantrill posted on 2005-03-23 11:34:33 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. To: Magic (#0) HA HA r-u-n-n o-f-t posted on 2005-03-23 11:39:54 ET (1 image) Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. To: Magic (#4) Perhaps the town business to which he had been elected in the first place? Just a random thought ... You know how it is with politicians. They talk so much they just can't help but say something stupid. There are much better arguments to be made against saying the pledge than the "under God" phrase. duckhunter posted on 2005-03-23 11:40:25 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. To: Magic (#0) "All the things I was taught as a child about this country, including religious tolerance, liberty and freedom, don't ring true today," he said. Got that right...the only thing paler then the sense of freedom left in this nation is it's sense of right from wrong... Homeier, who voted against Habecker, said many residents did not appreciate Habecker using his position on the town board to voice his political views. What an absolutely scary statement. He was expressing a personal view. war posted on 2005-03-23 11:43:48 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. To: war (#8) What an absolutely scary statement. He was expressing a personal view. He can still express it ... no one has stopped him from doing so. He just won't be doing it on city time. Magic posted on 2005-03-23 11:44:51 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. To: war (#8) scary statement.....personal view. Let me get this straight. Are you saying his constituents had no right to recall him under the recall provision? What about THEIR right to free expression? Ghost of Quantrill posted on 2005-03-23 11:45:56 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. To: Ghost of Quantrill (#10) What seems to me to be the "scary" part on the part of the left is their (until now tolerated) antics are no longer being tolerated. The side which includes Dan Rather, Howard Dean, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Ward Churchill and assorted rabble are rightfully concerned their salad days are behind them. Magic posted on 2005-03-23 11:52:20 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12. To: Ghost of Quantrill (#10) Are you saying his constituents had no right to recall him under the recall provision? What about THEIR right to free expression? Yes they did. That doesn't render their reason benign. war posted on 2005-03-23 12:11:16 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13. To: war (#12) doesn't render their reason benign Democracy makes no provision for one person's opinion as to whether his co- voters are acting benign or malignant. Ghost of Quantrill posted on 2005-03-23 12:18:19 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14. To: Magic (#9) He can still express it ... no one has stopped him from doing so. He just won't be doing it on city time. Or more importantly, on the city PAYROLL. USConservative posted on 2005-03-23 12:23:11 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15. To: Magic (#1) Just a he had the right NOT to say the pledge, and the citizens had the right to boot his ass off the council ping ... Maybe its just me, but if the idiot hadn't outted himself as an idiot, he'd still be in a position to cast votes that affect the community. Glad he did the dumb thing....(grin) Badeye posted on 2005-03-23 12:26:07 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16. To: Ghost of Quantrill (#13) Democracy makes no provision for one person's opinion as to whether his co- voters are acting benign or malignant. NO...but simple observation does. war posted on 2005-03-23 12:26:54 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17. To: Magic (#11) What seems to me to be the "scary" part on the part of the left is their (until now tolerated) antics are no longer being tolerated. The side which includes Dan Rather, Howard Dean, John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Ward Churchill and assorted rabble are rightfully concerned their salad days are behind them. Yep...the implosion does in fact continue...whats the latest with Chief Sitting Bulls**t, btw? Badeye posted on 2005-03-23 12:27:17 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18. To: USConservative (#14) Or more importantly, on the city PAYROLL. Agreed .. there is no requirement for taxpayers to subsidize this crap. He can shout it all day at his home, his business or on the street corner. Magic posted on 2005-03-23 12:28:18 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19. To: Badeye (#17) whats the latest with Chief Sitting Bulls**t, btw? Don't know ... as far as I know, CU is still building its case and NOT negotiating with him for an easy out. Magic posted on 2005-03-23 12:29:09 ET Reply Trace -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20. To: Magic (#19) whats the latest with Chief Sitting Bulls**t, btw? Don't know ... as far as I know, CU is still building its case and NOT negotiating with him for an easy out. Excellent. Badeye posted on 2005-03-23 12:34:48 ET Reply Trace
NBL, NFL, NBA, NHL, etc.. What a waste of time and money.
Has your house got a flat, or are you just playing dopey? Take your washed up secession act and stick it up your sorry ass.
Socialistic Origin of the ‘Pledge’. This was written by the ACLU sometimes in the 1990’s. Please keep that in mind when reading it. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ Every class day over 60 million public and parochial school teachers and students in the U.S. recite the Pledge of Allegiance along with thousands of Americans at official meetings of the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Elks, Masons, American Legion, and others. During the televised bicentennial celebration of the U.S. Constitution for the school children on September 17, 1987, the children as a group did not recite any part of the Constitution. However, President Reagan did lead the nation's school children in reciting the Pledge. Yet probably not one of them knows the history or original meaning of the Pledge. In the presidential campaign of 1988, George Bush successfully used the Pledge in his campaign against Mike Dukakis. Ironically, Bush did not seem to know the words of the Pledge until his campaign manager told him to memorize it. The teachers and students in the New England private schools he attended, Greenwich Country Day School and Phillips Andover Academy, did not recite the pledge. By contrast, Dukakis and his mother, a public school teacher, recited the Pledge in the public schools. Yet Bush criticized Dukakis for vetoing a bill in Massachusetts requiring public school teachers but not private school teachers to recite the Pledge. Dukakis vetoed the bill on grounds that it violated the constitutional right of free speech. How did this Pledge of Allegiance to a flag replace the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights in the affections of many Americans? Among the nations in the world, only the USA and the Philippines, imitating the USA, have a pledge to their flag. Who institutionalized the Pledge as the cornerstone of American patriotic programs and indoctrination in the public and parochial schools? In 1892, a socialist named Francis Bellamy created the Pledge of Allegiance for Youths' Companion, a national family magazine for youth published in Boston. The magazine had the largest national circulation of its day with a circulation around 500,000. Two liberal businessmen, Daniel Ford and James Upham, his nephew, owned Youths' Companion. One hundred years ago the American flag was rarely seen in the classroom or in front of the school Upham changed that. In 1888, the magazine began a campaign to sell American flags to the public schools. By 1892, his magazine had sold American flags to about 26 thousands schools. In 1891, Upham had the idea of using the celebration of the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbus' discovery of America to promote the use of the flag in the public schools. The same year, the magazine hired Daniel Ford's radical young friend, Baptist minister, Nationalist, and Christian Socialist leader, Francis Bellamy, to help Upham in his public relations work. Bellamy was the first cousin of the famous American socialist, Edward Bellamy. Edward Bellamy's futuristic novel, "Looking Backward", published in 1888, described a utopian Boston in the year 2000. The book spawned an elitist socialist movement in Boston known as "Nationalism," whose members wanted the federal government to national most of the American economy. Francis Bellamy was a member of this movement and a vice president of its auxiliary group, the Society of Christian Socialists. He was a baptist minister and he lectured and preached on the virtues of socialism and the evils of capitalism. He gave a speech on "Jesus the Socialist" and a series of sermons on "The Socialism of the Primitive Church." In 1891, he was forced to resign from his Boston church, the Bethany Baptist church, because of his socialist activities. He then joined the staff of the Youths' Companion. By February 1892, Francis Bellamy and Upham had lined up the National Education Association to support the Youths' Companion as a sponsor of the national public schools' observance of Columbus Day along with the use of the American flag. By June 29, Bellamy and Upham had arranged for Congress and President Benjamin Harrison to announce a national proclamation making the public school flag ceremony the center of the national Columbus Day celebrations for 1892. Bellamy, under the supervision of Upham, wrote the program for this celebration, including its flag salute, the Pledge of Allegiance. His version was, "I pledge allegiance to my flag and to the Republic for which it stands -- one nation indivisible -- with liberty and justice for all." This program and its pledge appeared in the September 8 issue of Youths' Companion. He considered putting the words "fraternity" and "equality" in the Pledge but decided they were too radical and controversial for public schools. The original Pledge was recited while giving a stiff, uplifted right hand salute, criticized and discontinued during WWII. The words "my flag" were changed to "the flag of the United States of America" because it was feared that the children of immigrants might confuse "my flag" for the flag of their homeland. The phrase, "Under God," was added by Congress and President Eisenhower in 1954 at the urging of the Knights of Columbus. The American Legion's constitution includes the following goal: "To foster and perpetuate a one hundred percent Americanism." One of its major standing committees was the "Americanism Commission" and its subsidiary, the "Counter Subversive Activities Committee." To the fear of immigrants, it added the fear of communism8. Over the years the Legion has worked closely with the NEA and with the U.S. Office of Education. The Legion insisted on "one hundred percent" Americanism in public school courses in American history, civics, geography and English. The Pledge was a part of this Americanism campaign and, in 1950, the Legion adopted the Pledge as an official part of its own ritual. In 1922, the Ku Klux Klan, which also had adopted the "one hundred percent Americanism" theme along with the flag ceremonies and the Pledge, became a political power in the state of Oregon and arranged for legislation to be passes requiring all Catholic children to attend public schools. The U.S. Supreme Court later overturned this legislation. Perhaps a team of social scientists and historians could explain why over the last century the Pledge of Allegiance has become a major centerpiece in American patriotism programs. A pledge or loyalty oath for children was not built around the Declaration of Independence -- "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal..." Or the Gettysburg address -- "a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal..." Apparently, over the last century, Americans have been uncomfortable with the word "equality" as a patriotic theme. In 1992 the nation will begin its second century with the Pledge of Allegiance. Perhaps the time has come to see that this allegiance should be to the U.S. constitution and not to a piece of cloth.
To: The MORONS on LP "...but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." They didn't like it when Ashcroft's religion was being challenged during his confirmation process, but hypocrisy is their strong suit so they have no problem applying a religious test when an agnostic won't say the pledge.
I'll bet they don't even know where those words come from. And, if they Google it up and find out, they'll just spin it that it only means you can't discriminate against christians, but godless non-christians are still fair game.
Thank you so much for this valuable information. Your time would be better spent putting a screen in your screen door.
That pesky ol' yellow thing again, eh?
Why should he be shot? Because he doesn't believe in God? Because he doesn't pledge? Because _________________? If it is God, does this mean that everyone who doesn't believe in God should be shot? I mean, even Satan believes in God? If it is the pledge, why should he be required to break the constitutional oath he took? If it is something else, I'd like to know for discussion purposes, of course ..........
Damn.......they're caught again!
Oh...ROTF.......you nut! Or maybe I should say me bad?
#2. To: hfrancis (#0)
#3. To: Ferret Mike (#2)
#4. To: hfrancis (#0)
David Habecker sits while others stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.
#5. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#3)
"Of course, people take their pledge of allegiance just about as seriously as they do their wedding vows."
#6. To: CWRWinger (#4)
"Adding "Under God" to the pledge was like installing a $1,000 stereo in a rusted out Yugo."
#7. To: Ferret Mike (#6)
And I'm sure the Goddess appreciates your loyalty to her
#8. To: CWRWinger (#7)
#9. To: Ferret Mike (#8)
I am of Wicca.
#10. To: All (#0)
dont' know why their waisting time on a recall, take'm outside and shoot the godless bastard.
#11. To: CWRWinger (#9)
Oh, just another yankee forum poster.
#12. To: CWRWinger (#9)
#13. To: Jethro Tull (#11)
toothless.
#14. To: All (#0)
nothing but golden gems..............
#15. To: Ferret Mike (#12)
Nah, I hate the Yankees. I'm a Red Sox fan. ;-D
#16. To: CWRWinger (#13)
#17. To: hfrancis (#0)
#18. To: hfrancis (#14)
#19. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#18)
goddamn NUKE, you know LOGIC and TRUTH doesnt sway them
#20. To: hfrancis (#19)
#21. To: CWRWinger (#17)
#22. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#1)
#23. To: hfrancis (#10)
#24. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#18)
#25. To: rowdee (#23)
i guess i should've used these(sarcasm)
#26. To: hfrancis (#25)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest