Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: White House Endorses Seizing Citizens’ Guns
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.gunpowdermagazine.com/b ... _l=MCXuG&awt_m=hlP1Erm__ntbXZc
Published: Dec 20, 2018
Author: Teresa Mull
Post Date: 2019-08-04 08:29:59 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 279
Comments: 9

White House Endorses Seizing Citizens’ Guns

Dec 20, 2018

By: Teresa Mull

President Trump’s Commission on School Safety just released a report with recommendations for “how to address school safety and violence.” Seizing guns is among the commission’s suggestions.

The report says:

The Commission endorses Extreme Risk Protection Order laws, which give authorities a temporary way to keep those who threaten society from possessing or purchasing firearms.

Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), also known as “Red Flag Gun Confiscation” laws, have taken effect in some states already. Gun owners across the country are having their guns seized by law enforcement, as Dudley Brown, president of the National Association for Gun Rights put it, “simply on the pretense of a ‘tip’ from someone you may not even know.”

Fox News reported in July more than 450 Florida residents had been ordered to give up their guns under the new law. In Jacksonville, one gun owner has already had 23 guns seized, and ten ERPO cases are pending. In New Jersey earlier this year, “police invaded a veteran’s home on the basis of something a child overheard at school and attempted to confiscate his guns without a warrant. One county in Washington State just announced officers seized 466 guns in 2018 alone.

Breitbart.com reports:

The White House School Safety Commission’s report will be released this week, and it will include calls for such confiscatory laws. On December 18, 2018, Breitbart News quoted Education Secretary Betsy DeVos’s preview of the report, saying, “Our report endorses states adoption of extreme risk protection orders, which temporarily restrict access to firearms to individuals found to be a danger to themselves or others.”

DeVos stressed that the White House wants the confiscatory orders structured in a way that is “cognizant of due process protections and respectful of Second Amendment liberties.”

Four Scary Facts

Gunpowder Magazine has repeatedly sounded the alarm on red flag laws, and reminds its readers of these four scary facts regarding ERPOs:

Law-abiding gun owners are guilty until proven innocent under ERPOs.

These bills open the floodgates for vindictive family members, friends, or John Q. Public to accuse you of almost anything as justification to take your firearms. They can take these accusations to court, even though you’ve never been charged with or convicted of a crime. At that point, you are on defense to try to convince the judge why you should be able to keep your guns and your Second Amendment rights

ERPOs open up a Pandora’s Box of ways for cunning lawyers and conniving family members to exploit gun owners.

Red flag ERPO bills have been written so broadly on two fronts that in some instances, people are given near-endless possibilities by which to use the legal system to persecute gun owners. The list of what violations you can be reported for is all over the place. If you made a comment to someone or seemed depressed, virtually raising any type of “mental health” red flag could end with you battling for your Second Amendment rights in court.

The timeframe for confiscation can go on for months.

ERPOs can last for weeks, months, or up to a year in cases where a gun owner would have to appear for repeated court hearings to try to win back his or her Constitutional rights. In some instances, the government would hold onto your guns for you; other bills have a neutral third party holding onto your guns.

Both political parties are supporting ERPOs.

Many would have you believe that Democrats are leading the charge for gun control in the wake of the horrific schools shootings of 2018. But nothing could be further from the truth. Republicans are leading efforts as well.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

#8. To: BTP Holdings, titorite, 4 (#0)

Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), also known as “Red Flag Gun Confiscation” laws ... Law-abiding gun owners are guilty until proven innocent under ERPOs. ... Both political parties are supporting ERPOs.

titorite @ #5: Red flag laws have killed a number of innocent people.


Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law - The United States Department of Justice

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW

SUMMARY:

Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.


TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-08-05   19:55:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: GreyLmist (#8)

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW

I hear you about this Color of Law stuff.

The whole trouble is the cops do whatever they want, until the Courts tell them they cannot do it.

Now I was riding in the local city taxi the other day and I stop to pick up a donut at gas station 2 blocks from my destination. On the way back to taxi I picked 2 plastic bottles from the trash.

The taxi driver was complaining and said she would tell them at the office. I told her if she did that and there were any kind of repercussions, it would open a whole can of worms they could not consume and the ACLU would back me on it.

Under the Americas With Disabilities Act they cannot bar me from riding. There was also some recycling in the back of the taxi which I was taking into the workshop. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-08-05   21:15:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 9.

        There are no replies to Comment # 9.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 9.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest