[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Ron Paul See other Ron Paul Articles Title: Poodlehead Rand Paul Comes Out in Favor of Red Flag Gun Laws and No Borders! You can always count on Rand Paul to come out on the wrong side of the issue eventually, no matter what that issue may be. Having borders? Unconstitutional. Taking conservatives’ guns away? Please, go right ahead! t. Randlet. Big League Politics: Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) shocked his liberty-minded base after he signaled support for red flag gun laws in an interview on Tuesday, as reported by the Associated Press on Tuesday. The AP profiled Paul’s recovery from lung-removal surgery, which happened as a complication from an ambush attack by his left-wing former neighbor Rene Boucher outside of his home in late 2017. He is close to a full recovery and ready to return to work in Washington D.C. “It is great to be here,” he said while speaking in Kentucky at a chamber of commerce luncheon. “It is great to be upright and walking around and beginning to heal.” “And like anybody else who’s used to being active, it’s hard to sit still,” Paul added. “I’m ready to get back in the mix of things and to start traveling around the state some.” Arguably the most noteworthy line from Paul’s remarks was his position on gun control. Paul, who is one of the most unflinching proponents for gun rights in the Senate, made remarks indicating his support for red flag laws that would confiscate firearms from individuals deemed threatening to the public safety. “I’m not opposed to sort of an emergency order for 48 hours and then you get a hearing in a court where you get the full due-process protections,” he said. “It’s the one thing that could fix a lot of stuff. I think most of these homicidal attackers … are sending off signals to their family and community.” Yikes, Rand. I don’t know what I even expected. The truth is, he was destined for mediocrity and unpopularity the moment he was given that retarded name. His father, who was himself “Rand” in all but name, went ahead and named his son in honor of a psycho Jew she-shill who wanted the goyim to accept the teachings of Jewish Capitalism into their hearts and souls. With such a rocky start, it’s not hard to see why Rand went on to become such a failure later in life. Needless to say, Red Flag Gun Laws are a very bad idea. They will be the preferred method used by the Left/Liberals/Bolsheviks to strip bad goyim of their weapons and send them to gulags. There’s a reason that they’re called “Red Flag” laws, after all. And while we’re at it, Lolberts and Communists really are just two flip-sides to the same coin. If I wanted to take a deep dive on the subject, I’d start by pointing out that Communism is always supported and fostered by Capitalist countries in both the revolution stage and then in the recovery and investment stage. This seems counter-intuitive to people, but it all makes sense when you consider the fact that Communism, wherever it has been tried, has basically reduced the cost of human labor to almost zero – imposing slave-like conditions on the people of the country that it conquers. With such low labor costs, Capital is eager to flood in and start setting up manufacturing. It’s not an exaggeration to say that the relationship is symbiotic. People forget that the entire economy of the USSR was built by American companies eager to swoop in on a new market and use the cheap labor now afforded to them by the Communist revolution. Ford Model A’s were built during the NEP period in the USSR. You could say that this was a fluke, I suppose, but it happened again in China and Vietnam did it not? Does any lolbert ever ask why Capital is so eager to leave middle-class heavy countries and move into supposedly hostile Communist countries without individual rights and business guarantees and Jesus and all that jazz that patriotic big business is supposed to be for? No? Well, it is because Capitalism simply cannot exist without Communism. Basically, Communism is the wrecking crew that goes in and destroys traditional societies and turns everyone into an atomized worker when simple Capitalist carrot and stick coercion measures don’t work. Religion, peasant culture, the nobility – anything that can stand against the power of Capital is systematically destroyed if it refuses to first be bought out. That is, any large country with a well-paid workforce and culturally-grounded society needs to be either bought out or brought down. Fancy-pantsy ideology and free-market Jewish theology is just used as a smoke and mirror show to distract the goyim from true power processes. Just look at what happened in the USSR. They were being propped up by the Capitalists and they had literally no problem rationalizing it all away. What I’m trying to say here is that ideology is bullshit, and watching Poodlehead Paul try wrestle with his religious beliefs instead of doing what is the best for his country and for his constituency – rural White folks – is frustrating and retarded. What’s worse, Rand no doubt thinks his constant waffling makes him a principled man. But there is only one principle worth ever following in this world and that is doing what is right by your own people, ideology be damned. Rand Paul is just an unhelpful one-lunged doofus who will never be President. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#1. To: Ada (#0)
Poodlehead, the perfect description that's been missing all these years. Because he's the commies' lapdog AND his head looks like a poodle with all that unruly fleece on top. He CANNOT be trusted.
Wouldn't call him a commie lap dog. He's just a meritocracy who hasn't got much of a clue.
A meritocracy?
#5. To: NeoconsNailed (#4)
Hardly. Spell check error. should have been mediocrity.
meritocract?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||