[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The ChatGPT CEO's Web Of Lies by Vanessa Wingardh

The Fall of the Israel Lobby Has Begun — And This Is Just the Start | Denzel Washington speech

'Statistically Almost Impossible' – 4 AfD Candidates Have Died 'Suddenly And Unexpectedly' Before Key State Election

Israel And The West Set The Stage For Next Round Of Warfare On Iran

Last night in Milan, an 18-year-old girl was beaten and raped while trying to catch a train home

Russia has developed a truly modern system of warfare.

Alberta's Independence and Finances

Daniela Cambone: 100% Loan Losses Loom as Fed Shrinks Balance Sheet-

Tucker Carlson

Cash Jordan: ICE HALTS 'Invasion Convoy'... ESCORTS 'Armada' of Illegals BACK to MEXICO

Cash Jordan: “We’re Coming In"... Migrant Mob ENTERS ICE HQ, Get ERASED By 'Deportation Unit'

Opioids More Likely To Kill Than Car Crashes Or Suicide

The association between COVID-19 “vaccines” and cognitive decline

Democrats Sink to Near Zero in New Gallup Poll, Theyre Just Not Satisfied

She Couldn't Read Her Own Diploma: Why Public Schools Pass Students but Fail Society

Peter Schiff: Gold To $6,000 Next Year, Dollar Index To 70

Russia Just Admitted Exactly What Everyone – But Trump – Already Knew About Putin's Ukraine Plans

Sex Offenses in London by Nationality

Greater Israel Collapses: Iran the Next Target

Before Jeffrey Epstein: The FINDERS

Cyprus: The Israeli Flood Has Become A Deluge

Israel Actually Slaughtered Their Own People On Oct 7th Says Israeli Newspaper w/ Max Blumenthal

UK Council Offers Emotional Support To Staff "Discomforted" By Seeing The National Flag

Inside the Underground City Where 700 Trucks Come and Go Every Day

Fentanyl Involved In 70% Of US Drug Overdose Deaths

Iran's New Missiles. Short Version

Obama Can't Bear This. Kash Patel Exposes Dead Chef Revelation. Obama’s Legacy DESTROYED!

Triple-Digit Silver Imminent? Critical Mineral, Backwardation & Remonetization | Mike Maloney

Israel Sees Sykes-Picot Borders As 'Meaningless' & 'Will Go Where They Want': Trump Envoy

Bring Back Asylums: It's Time To Talk About Transgender Fatigue In America


World News
See other World News Articles

Title: Greenland and Denmark, Prepare Your Defenses!
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.fff.org/2019/08/19/gree ... denmark-prepare-your-defenses/
Published: Aug 20, 2019
Author: Jacob G. Hornberger
Post Date: 2019-08-20 17:38:24 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 138
Comments: 5

Both Denmark and Greenland are reacting negatively to President Trump’s expressed interest in purchasing Greenland, an autonomous country within the Kingdom of Denmark. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederikson called Trump’s idea “absurd.” A spokesman for Greenland’s premier Kim Kielson, stated, “Greenland is not for sale.”

Is that the end of the controversy? Not necessarily. Just ask the Mexican people. After their government rejected an offer by U.S. officials to purchase the northern half of their country, they ended up losing it anyway through U.S. military force.

In 1845, newly elected U.S. President James Polk made an offer to Mexico to purchase what amounted to the states of California, New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas. The previous year Texas had been annexed by the United States as the nation’s 28th state, but the annexation had not been agreed to by Mexico, which continued to claim Texas as part of Mexico.

Mexico turned down Polk’s offer, but Polk would not be dissuaded. Instead, he began looking for an opportunity to go to war with Mexico, which, if the U.S. was victorious, would permit the U.S. government to simply steal the land it was trying to purchase.

Polk’s challenge was to find a way to make it look like it was Mexico, rather than the United States, that started the war. That way, Polk could claim that the United States was simply defending itself against an aggressive power and then claim his booty as part of a treaty that would end the war.

In 1836, Texas had declared its independence from Mexico. Following the defeat of a Texas force at the Alamo in San Antonio to Mexican dictator Antonio Lopez de Santa Ana, Gen. Sam Houston’s forces defeated Santa Ana’s forces at San Jacinto. However, Mexico never agreed to Texas independence, instead contending that Texas remained part of Mexico.

Moreover, at the time of the U.S. annexation of Texas there was still a dispute over the southern border of Texas. The U.S. government claimed that it was the Rio Grande. Mexico claimed that it was the Nueces River, which was much further north.

Seizing upon the disputed claims, Polk sent U.S. military forces into the disputed territory in the hope that they would be attacked by Mexican forces. It was a reasonable hope, given that the Polk’s forces would be on territory that Mexico was claiming was Mexico.

Polk’s strategy worked brilliantly. In 1846, Mexican forces attacked a U.S. army outpost in the disputed territory, killing 12 American soldiers and capturing 52. Polk declared that Mexico had invaded the United States and secured a congressional declaration of war against Mexico. (This was when U.S. presidents were still complying with the requirement in the U.S. Constitution that prohibits the president from waging war without a congressional declaration of war.)

The outcome of the war was never in doubt. Mexico was an impoverished nation that was being ruled by a crisis-ridden dictatorial regime. The United States, by contrast, was a wealthy and powerful nation with a stable government and a professional army.

In 1848 the war came to an end with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which provided that Mexico would cede what amounted to about the entire northern half of its country. That’s how the United States ended up absorbing the lands encompassed by the states of California, New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas.

At least Polk was generous. Even though his army had won the war, he was still willing to pay Mexico some money for the land that he was seizing from them. The U.S. government agreed to pay Mexico the sum of $15 million ($434 million today), which was somewhat less than half of what Polk was offering before his war. The U.S. also agreed to assume $3.25 million ($94 million today) in debts that the Mexican government owed U.S. citizens.

The U.S. takeover of the northern half of Mexico meant absorbing centuries of Mexican law, history, customs, and city and street names. Moreover, it included immediately making all Mexican citizens in the newly acquired land, whose language was Spanish, American citizens. It was an action that would continue to impact Americans into the 21st century, given the modern-day American concern about Mexicans illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border to enter lands that once belonged to their country as well as concerns that Hispanics are taking over America.

Would President Trump do the same thing to acquire Greenland that Polk did to acquire the northern half of Mexico? Who knows? But Greenland and Denmark would be wise to prepare their defenses, just in case.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Polk’s challenge was to find a way to make it look like it was Mexico, rather than the United States, that started the war. That way, Polk could claim that the United States was simply defending itself against an aggressive power and then claim his booty as part of a treaty that would end the war.

Some things never change.

Pinguinite  posted on  2019-08-20   22:02:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ada (#0)

The lord and god, cry baby, Trump wants his way and will do anything to get it. If Trump starts anything, it will not go good for the US and the American people will be shamed.

Darkwing  posted on  2019-08-21   12:50:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Ada, 4 (#0) (Edited)

In 1848 the war came to an end with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which provided that Mexico would cede what amounted to about the entire northern half of its country. That’s how the United States ended up absorbing the lands encompassed by the states of California, New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas.

At least Polk was generous. Even though his army had won the war, he was still willing to pay Mexico some money for the land that he was seizing from them. The U.S. government agreed to pay Mexico the sum of $15 million ($434 million today), which was somewhat less than half of what Polk was offering before his war. The U.S. also agreed to assume $3.25 million ($94 million today) in debts that the Mexican government owed U.S. citizens.

The U.S. takeover of the northern half of Mexico meant absorbing centuries of Mexican law, history, customs, and city and street names. Moreover, it included immediately making all Mexican citizens in the newly acquired land, whose language was Spanish, American citizens. It was an action that would continue to impact Americans into the 21st century, given the modern-day American concern about Mexicans illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border to enter lands that once belonged to their country as well as concerns that Hispanics are taking over America.


Polk was much more generous than that. America won the war with Mexico, meaning America wasn't obligated to do anything for Mexico's benefit. All of Mexico became America's territory to keep, if Polk wasn't generous enough to return the land that is Mexico now to them - in addition to everything else they were given in that Treaty. Mexico was the Spanish Empire's land acquired militarily from Indians of those regions. It only became "Mexico's land" through war against Spain: Mexican War of Independence (1807–1829).

Why don't people, like this author, griping about land that was once Mexico's also gripe about America's land that was once Britain's before the Revolutionary War?; as if we should give it back to the Brits so that they can give it back to the Indians who warred against each other for territorial domains. I don't know of any "Social Justice Warriors", either, who would insist it was ok for Germans to migratorily reoccupy the lands that country lost in WWI. Should Italians move to reclaim lands of the Roman Empire, which they had ruled for centuries? Should Christians move to reclaim lands of the Holy Roman Empire, which they also ruled for centuries? Many similar historical examples are available for review by SJWs but they don't really want to discuss all of that - just whatever they think might get America and Western Civilization to capitulate to their extortion and dominion agendas.

This Revanchism hypocrisy by Globalists on behalf of illegal migrants from Mexico is ridiculous and insidious. The motive is to demand lands, money, etc. "reparations" as retaliation for America winning the war with Mexico and to collapse our nation so that it could be controlled thereafter by foreign powers. They don't even have objections to dominant foreign powers per se, unless the foreign power is America or Western Civ. countries or Turkey evicting Armenians as WWI-wartime National Security threats.

(French: Revanchisme, from revanche, "revenge") is the political manifestation of the will to reverse territorial losses incurred by a country, often following a war or social movement. As a term, revanchism originated in 1870s France in the aftermath of the Franco-Prussian War among nationalists who wanted to avenge the French defeat and reclaim the lost territories of Alsace-Lorraine.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-08-21   23:39:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: GreyLmist (#3)

There you go again, thinking way too clearly and logically. :-) Thanks!

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2019-08-22   0:18:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Lod (#4)

The outcome of the war was never in doubt. Mexico was an impoverished nation that was being ruled by a crisis-ridden dictatorial regime. The United States, by contrast, was a wealthy and powerful nation with a stable government and a professional army.

OLDE RULE OF ANCIENT HISTORY...

A NATION MAY REMAIN SOVEREIGN only as long as they can militarily maintain their borders. Mexico is free to invade any day they choose and take the US and Canada.

Cynicom  posted on  2019-08-22   2:33:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]