Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Why are automatic weapons legal in some American states when they have no use in hunting, or even self defence?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Aug 22, 2019
Author: Chris Beall
Post Date: 2019-08-22 21:33:55 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 179
Comments: 4

Why are automatic weapons legal in some American states when they have no use in hunting, or even self defence?

Chris Beall, I have been a gun owner since my teenage years.
Updated 10d ago · Upvoted by Charles Reed, 45 years working on firearms. and Dave Sparazynski, Smallarms expert, probably fired around a half-million rounds over 30 years.

Given your spelling of “defense" as “defence" I'll presume you're not from America, and you're likely from the UK, so I'll explain how things work in America.

Automatic weapons are legal in all states. The possession of automatic weapons has been heavily regulated since the National Firearms Act was enacted in 1934. In order to purchase one, you must purchase a $200 tax stamp. However, the manufacture and import of automatic weapons has been illegal since 1986. Since the manufacture and import has been prohibited for 33 years, the supply is very limited. This makes the average cost of an automatic weapon in the US around $20,000. There is also a very lengthy and arduous background check process which is much MUCH more detailed than the background check process for a semi-auto, revolver, bolt action, lever action or shotgun. It takes about a year for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to approve each purchase.

It is this cost and background check that makes the possession of automatic weapons in the US very rare, and a province of the wealthy, gun ranges and collectors.

Now to address your insistence that automatic weapons have no use in self-defense or hunting. I wouldn't hunt with an automatic, but I could certainly use one for self-defense. But that isn't the point. Your question shows that you don't understand the 2nd Amendment to our Constitution.

Having a use for hunting or self-defense is irrelevant. We have the human right to self-defense. A firearm is the most efficient self-defense tool ever invented. An automatic, while some may argue isn't good for self-defense is. Our Constitution recognizes and protects our right to keep and bear arms.

Whether we need one for a specific purpose doesn't matter. It's a right. It's a right that we take seriously.


Poster Comment:

And here is another Brit that knows nothing of our Constitution.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

And here is another Brit that knows nothing of our Constitution.

Not much about weapons either. He's been listening to American Media.

"If we don’t adhere to the Constitution on matters as significant as presidential eligibility, then the Constitution ceases to be a meaningful document for guiding our nation."

ndcorup  posted on  2019-08-23   1:45:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: ndcorup (#1) (Edited)

He's been listening to American Media.

Yes and they know nothing of history either.

Bonnie and Clyde used the Browning Automatic Rifle in their crime spree. ;)

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-08-23   9:54:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

Beall: It is a guy thing.

Darkwing  posted on  2019-08-23   12:22:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

All citizens should own automatic weapons. Otherwise, they have no protection against government killers.

DWornock  posted on  2019-08-23   16:33:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest