[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why) Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them America Is Reaching A Boiling Point The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani Man puts down ABC's The View on air Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But.. Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’ Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics, BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk, Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up! Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It! Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!] 1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires. Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!! Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances "NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Israel/Zionism
See other Israel/Zionism Articles

Title: Who rented the 91st floor of the World Trade Center? "THE SIMPLE CASE FOR ISRAELI INVOLVEMENT IN 9/11"
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://www.brasscheck.com/video/th ... volvement-in-9-11/?omhide=true
Published: Sep 21, 2019
Author: SGTReport / BrasscheckTV
Post Date: 2019-09-21 10:07:57 by NeoconsNailed
Keywords: None
Views: 3764
Comments: 19

From: "Brasscheck TV" Subject: Who rented the 91st floor of the World Trade Center?

=================== BrasscheckTV Report ===================

Who rented the 91st floor of the World Trade Center?

Israeli art students.

Israeli art students...some of whom the DEA later said were Mossad agents and Israeli military.

Video:

www.brasscheck.com/video/...israeli-involvement-in-9- 11/

- Brasscheck TV

P.S. We can't make this unique news service available without the help of our subscribers. ​​​​​​​ Please consider joining the ranks of BrasscheckTV.com supporters

Thanks!

Details here: www.brasscheck.com/video/donate-to-brasscheck-tv/

Going on vacation? Write us back and we'll turn your subscription off and back on. Just give us the start and stop dates.

How Brasscheck TV works:

You'll receive two videos every day.

One at 9 AM (US eastern time) and a replay at 9 PM.

(Don't worry, you don't have to watch them all!)

You can watch them later or delete -- whichever you prefer.

If your email box is getting filled up you can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of every Brasscheck e-mail.

You can also follow us on Facebook, but frankly we think email is more private and the better option.

If you are a Facebook person...

Click here to follow us:

Facebook:www.facebook.com/BrasscheckTV

Click for Full Text!

Poster Comment:

Note the sub-headline in the email -- "Israeli art students"! If ameriKa had any normal reflexes at all, Americans would permanently boycott all jew businesses after 9/11. Remember the dancing Israelis?

http://www.israellobby.org/urbanmoving/

Whoa, website! http://www.israellobby.org

I see it's a big subject. Searching just one aspect of what the lady said, 9/11 fuse holders, brings an avalanche of good stuff. WooHA, The Young Jerks "Ted Nugent Thinks Israel Was Behind 9/11":

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvL5g2a87ZE

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17.

#3. To: NeoconsNailed (#0)

After 9-11 happened I was investigating this pretty heavily and knew about the art students as well as the fact they were actually living in the world trade center. It made sense to me then just like it does right now that they were directly responsible for the destruction. It also seems that our own government has had a dirty hand in this as well and the worst part is the people will never have the attention span needed to piece it all together. It is a labyrinth of lies and secrecy that shroud the truth because to tell the truth would demoralize everyone who sacrificed for those lies.

I think in all honesty if the truth were told, we the people would be demanding the heads of everyone who played a part and then annihilate the country whose people did this.

TommyTheMadArtist  posted on  2019-09-21   15:44:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

then annihilate the country whose people did this

It is said by some that several of the hijackers were Saudis. Thee Madrassa's in Saudi Arabia are the source of radical Wahhabi Islam.

But we know those planes were remote controlled by the Flight Termination System which was installed in all commercial airliners in the 1990s. This System can be controlled from several hundred miles away. There were no hijackers on those planes and the pilots had zero control since the System over rides pilot controls. This System was installed to safely land aircraft that had been hijacked.

I knew a Bird Colonel in the Pentagon who was vying to be the world's leading arms merchant. He sold Saudi Arabia many hundreds of millions in U.S. weapons systems.

After the 2nd attempt on the life of Gerald Ford (Nelson Rockefeller was V.P.) Ford said, "It is getting so the President can no longer walk among the people."

The Colonel retired to his farm in Virginia and began looking into what was going on in this country. His first book about it was Barbarians Inside The Gates which is now out of print but can still be found online in either new or used condition. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-09-22   2:33:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

we know those planes were remote controlled by the Flight Termination System which was installed in all commercial airliners in the 1990s. This System can be controlled from several hundred miles away. There were no hijackers on those planes and the pilots had zero control since the System over rides pilot controls. This System was installed to safely land aircraft that had been hijacked.

I knew a Bird Colonel in the Pentagon who was vying to be the world's leading arms merchant. He sold Saudi Arabia many hundreds of millions in U.S. weapons systems.

Just because planes could be remote controlled doesn't mean they were that day. What is your theory for why none were remote controlled Militarily to a safe landing instead of the official story of all being crashed? Cheney was not our Military's Commander in Chief on 9/11. Vice Presidents aren't in their Chain of Command. Bush was reportedly in Florida for a school event during the first 3 alleged plane strikes. Assertions that the last alleged plane was ordered shot down don't explain why it wouldn't have been remote controllable by our Military to land at an airport. Boeing was charged with 94 violations of the Arms Control Act for selling the gyroscopic QRS-11 microchip illegally because it also functions as a dual-use weapons systems component for guided missles. More valuable on the black market than destroyed for 9/11 "optics".

State Department goes after Boeing | The Seattle Times

The State Department charges against Boeing relate to the export of jets that contain a gyroscopic microchip called QRS-11, used as a backup system in determining a plane’s orientation in the air.

Though a Boeing document refers to the chip as “relatively unsophisticated” technology, the gyrochip also has been used to help stabilize and steer guided missiles.

In the draft charging letter, the State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls alleges that between 2000 and 2003 Boeing broke export control laws in shipping to China and other countries what was then classified as militarily significant technology.

Further, it claims the company did so deliberately and repeatedly even after it had been warned to stop.

“False statements”

Boeing “was aware that a [State] Department export license was required but chose to export without authorization by using false statements on documents,” the charging letter alleges.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-09-22   14:53:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Just because planes could be remote controlled doesn't mean they were that day. What is your theory for why none were remote controlled Militarily to a safe landing instead of the official story of all being crashed?

Recall the "dancing Israelis" who were filming the planes hitting the Twin Towers from New Jersey. They were dancing and giving each other "high fives".

The police picked them up. They were held for three months and refused to take lie tests. When they finally agreed to take them, they all failed miserably.

They were interviewed on Israeli TV after their release. They said, "We were there to document the events." How did they know there were going to be "events"?

When those planes hit the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, it was an administrative coup d'état and George W. Bush was handed his head.

Not to mention the untold billions of dollars made from short selling the stocks of the airline companies involved in the events of the day. ;)

BTW, W was in Florida reading a story to school children. They made sure he was well out of the way. The only problem was the book was UPSIDE DOWN. LOL

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-09-22   16:24:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

When those planes hit the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, it was an administrative coup d'état and George W. Bush was handed his head.

What do you mean by that? Cheney pretending to be Commander in Chief for a Military excercise that day and our Military "forgetting" that Bush was their actual Commander in Chief? Or are you asserting that the Military was part of what you describe as "an administrative coup d'état"?

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-09-22   16:47:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Or are you asserting that the Military was part of what you describe as "an administrative coup d'état"?

They wanted W out of the way that day. When his aides came in and told him the planes hit the Twin Towers he should have excused himself, but he kept reading the story. How do you explain that unless he knew it was going to happen?

Remember, the remote control units can be used from several hundred miles away. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-09-22   16:53:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

They wanted W out of the way that day. When his aides came in and told him the planes hit the Twin Towers he should have excused himself, but he kept reading the story. How do you explain that unless he knew it was going to happen?

Remember, the remote control units can be used from several hundred miles away. ;)

I wouldn't explain it as "an administrative coup d'état". More like complicit. Why weren't the remote control units used from several hundred miles away or otherwise to safely land at least the last allegedly hijacked plane?

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-09-22   17:20:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Why weren't the remote control units used from several hundred miles away or otherwise to safely land at least the last allegedly hijacked plane?

That was NOT the plan. Remember what they said over at PNAC? They needed a new Pearl Harbor to invigorate the masses. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-09-22   18:18:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Why weren't the remote control units used from several hundred miles away or otherwise to safely land at least the last allegedly hijacked plane?

That was NOT the plan. Remember what they said over at PNAC? They needed a new Pearl Harbor to invigorate the masses. ;)

A Presidential order would have been required to shoot down a hijacked plane, with or without passengers, but why would shooting it down even have been a consideration, much less ordered? It should have just been Standard Operating Procedure to land it safely by the Flight Termination System that you mentioned, if there really was a danger that such a plane might be used like a kamikaze WMD. Otherwise, it could have crossed our Northerly border soon into the foreign country of Canada and endangered their people too. Instead, we're told that "heroic" passengers killed everybody aboard before the hijackers did because those alleged "heroes" were psychic or something and proceeded to crash the plane themselves to potentially spare people on the ground somewhere unknown because: they supposedly believed intuitively that there was no Military rescue on the way by NORAD or any other Military branches of the USA. Baloney. PNAC is a pack of warmongering provocateurs but Canada likely has Flight Termination System capability, as well, through NORAD and can probably act to implement it in its own Defense without having to contact a US President for any orders before doing so.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-09-22   19:46:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It should have just been Standard Operating Procedure to land it safely by the Flight Termination System that you mentioned

As I said, that was not the plan. The plan was to fly the planes into the Twin Towers.

And bin Laden had nothing to do with any of it. He was the patsy.

The asbestos in the Twin Towers was never removed, but abated. When the Towers fell all of that went up into the atmosphere.

Larry Silverstein made a huge profit from a court ruling which said the attacks were two separate occurrences.

For more reading: 911truth.org/news-from-the-complete-911-timeline- historycommons-org/

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-09-22   20:31:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It should have just been Standard Operating Procedure to land it safely by the Flight Termination System that you mentioned

As I said, that was not the plan. The plan was to fly the planes into the Twin Towers.

For all the talk of transponders being turned off by "hijackers" of the 4 alleged planes, still there are numerous media pics of precise flight path maps for every one of them, which means that being transponderless would not have made them "invisible" to being technologically tracked. At that time period, the Flight Termination System was mostly associated with rocket/missile technology to stop those from reaching a target. Reportedly, each of the first 3 targets were hit and the 4th either crashed into a mineshaft or evaporated on impact, except for some bits and pieces. If you don't think the PNACians had a plan for the last 2 alleged planes, I'm not sure why but our State Department did charge Boeing with selling jets before 9/11 with the dual-use QRS-11 chip that was classified as militarily significant. [Ref. the posted Seattle Times link above at post #5] So, while it's theoretically possible that the alleged planes or some number of them could plausibly have had remote control technology installed, that's not evidence it was installed and used to crash any of them. It's not likely, imo, that our Military and Canada's too could have been expected to "stand down" at any point that a plane was off course or that they wouldn't have been able to interrupt remote controlled flight paths without having to scramble fighter jets to do that.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-09-23   2:01:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

It's not likely, imo, that our Military and Canada's too could have been expected to "stand down" at any point that a plane was off course or that they wouldn't have been able to interrupt remote controlled flight paths without having to scramble fighter jets to do that.

I believe there were military exercises being conducted that same day to confuse what was happening. The memories are a bit fuzzy because of the meningitis. But that is what I recall. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-09-23   10:47:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#19. To: BTP Holdings (#17) (Edited)

I believe there were military exercises being conducted that same day to confuse what was happening. The memories are a bit fuzzy because of the meningitis. But that is what I recall. ;)

Yes, you are correct that there were war games/drills/exercises on September 11, 2001 and an actual Military operation was also ongoing that day in Alaska and nearby. However, Military commanders have disputed the issue of confusion by asserting that it's a good thing they were already at those exercise battle stations because that helped them to respond quicker than usual. This is an excerpt from projectcensored.org:

Representative Cynthia McKinney (D-Altanta) attempted to bring some attention to the 9/11 war games during the House Hearing on FY06 Department of Defense Budget, on March 11th, 2005. She questioned Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld and Chairman of the Joint Chief[s] of Staff, [General] Richard Myers about the four war games that took place on September 11th. [The Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman, General Myers,] claimed that war gaming was being held by several different departments [and] he felt the gaming actually provided “an easy transition from an exercise into a real world situation” and contributed to a quick response.

This is a 3-minute YouTube video clip of his statements in answer to Rep. McKinney's question at 0:50 about 4 war games in-process: Response - Cynthia Mckinney questions General Myers on 9 11 wargames - CSPAN coverage | Partial transcript:

@ 1:15, "The answer to the question is: No, it did not impair our response." ... @ 1:38, "there were two CPXs [Command Post Exercises]. There was one Department of Justice exercise that didn't have anything to do with the other three. And there was an actual operation ongoing because there was some Russian bomber activity up near Alaska." ... @ 2:15, "These are Command Post Exercises. What that means is: all the battle positions that are normally not filled are indeed filled. So, it was an easy transition from an exercise into a real world situation. It actually enhanced the response. Otherwise, it would take somewhere between 30 minutes and a couple of hours to fill those positions, those battle spaces, with the right staff officers."

This is a Wikipedia path map of Flight 93. Before turning in Ohio to go back towards Pennsylvania, it is shown as being very close to the Lake Erie border and could soon have been in Canada's airspace/territory if the trajectory wasn't changed fast. Just FYI re: Canada's self-Defense interests that day and readiness to respond to potential endangerment by scrambling their own jets, etc.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-09-23 17:03:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]