Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard gets 2020 endorsement from David Duke
Source: MarketWatch
URL Source: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/r ... 10-19?siteid=yhoof2&yptr=yahoo
Published: Oct 19, 2019
Author: New York Post
Post Date: 2019-10-19 12:00:02 by Dakmar
Keywords: None
Views: 4447
Comments: 52

Democratic presidential hopeful Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has apparently gotten an endorsement she said she can do without — from former KKK leader David Duke.

The 68-year-old white supremacist and former GOP Louisiana state senator plastered a banner on his Twitter page prominently featuring a photograph of the Hawaiian lawmaker, the New York Post reported.

“Tulsi Gabbard for President,” it blares, along with the tagline: “Finally a candidate who will actually put America First rather than Israel First!”

“Tulsi Gabbard is currently the only Presidential candidate who doesn’t want to send White children off to die for Israel,” the former Grand Wizard tweeted his more than 50,000 followers along with a photograph of Gabbard meeting a US service member and his child.

But Gabbard wasted no time in lashing back at Duke and rejected his backing.

“I have strongly denounced David Duke’s hateful views and his so-called ‘support’ multiple times in the past, and reject his support,” she told The Post in a statement Tuesday.

“Publicizing Duke’s so-called ‘endorsement’ is meant to distract from my message: that I will end regime-change wars, work to end the new cold war and take us away from the precipice of a nuclear war, which is a greater danger now than ever before.”

Gabbard — who is of Samoan heritage — served with the US Army National Guard in Iraq from 2004 to 2005 and was first elected to office in Hawaii in 2013.

The 37-year-old received Duke’s unwelcome endorsement despite several moves signaling her potential support for the Jewish state.

In November 2016, Duke tweeted that Gabbard was a representative of a “political realignment” he hoped to see in the US — and called for Donald Trump to appoint her secretary of state.

She responded: “U didn’t know I’m Polynesian/Cauc? Dad couldn’t use ‘whites only’ water fountain. No thanks. Ur white nationalism is pure evil.”

The following month, she tweeted: “Our movement is one of love/aloha, inclusivity. Duke represents hatred, racism, anti-Semitism, fear. We don’t want his ‘support.’ Period.”

In the early 2000s, Gabbard touted working for her father’s anti-gay organization, which sought to pass a measure against same-sex marriage in her state and promoted controversial conversion therapy.

In a statement to CNN, she said: “First, let me say I regret the positions I took in the past, and the things I said. I’m grateful for those in the LGBTQ+ community who have shared their aloha with me throughout my personal journey.”

Duke also endorsed Trump for president in 2016.

When asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper in February that year whether he’d disavow the former Grand Wizard, the then-Republican candidate said: “Just so you understand, I don’t know anything about David Duke, OK?”

Duke again praised Trump’s presidency after the deadly white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August 2017 in which Trump claimed there were “very fine people on both sides.”

Duke did not immediately respond to a message for comment Tuesday.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 32.

#1. To: world (#0)

Gabbard wasted no time in lashing back at Duke and rejected his backing.

See? She's no different than the rest, just the fake opposition.

My late great Populist Party comrade John Kucek knew how to tweak 'em and get some publicity for reality.....

www.apnews.com/9 a9b45f9ebd43ab6ede47bb858bf5481

www.nytimes.com/1994/04/2...shun-their-candidate.html

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2019-10-19   12:21:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: NeoconsNailed (#1)

See? She's no different than the rest, just the fake opposition.

She could have taken a somewhat different position, but what she needs to do is preempt any accusations of accepting the dreaded "anti-semite" label, as that just gives ammo to the MSM bias that she's already dealing with now.

She could have simply stated that all US citizens have the right to vote and that she is seeking the votes of all US citizens regardless of ideology, including those that are flawed, to be president of all American people regardless of race or creed.

Pinguinite  posted on  2019-10-19   12:40:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Pinguinite (#4)

She could have simply stated that all US citizens have the right to vote and that she is seeking the votes of all US citizens regardless of ideology, including those that are flawed, to be president of all American people regardless of race or creed.

Excellent....

Just another for sale politician, disgraceful.

Wraps herself in the Flag that represents ALL, then denies rights of others to select or decide whom they prefer for office.

Gabbard has prostituted herself, just another poliktical whore.

Cynicom  posted on  2019-10-19   13:41:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Cynicom (#5) (Edited)

Wraps herself in the Flag that represents ALL, then denies rights of others to select or decide whom they prefer for office.

HOW does she do that?

What am I missing?

BTW,if she REALLY thinks her father was Polynesian,I have bad news for her,starting with,"You are whiter than I am".

I am NOT saying the man her mother married isn't Polynesian or that there is anything "wrong" with being Polynesian,,but I am saying he ain't THAT baby daddy.

sneakypete  posted on  2019-10-20   12:35:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: sneakypete (#31)

HOW does she do that?

What am I missing?

In all of her interviews she repeats over and over again about her military service, about her brothers and sisters in the military. She fought for rights of others etc etc. Then she goes to great length to deny one person on national tv their right of choice.

Cynicom  posted on  2019-10-20   13:04:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 32.

#33. To: Cynicom (#32)

Then she goes to great length to deny one person on national tv their right of choice.

What right was that, Cyni? Was it the right to choose to have an abortion? ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-10-20 13:57:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 32.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest