Title: Does Tulsi really want to know who did 9/11? Source:
[None] URL Source:http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=131529 Published:Nov 6, 2019 Author:State of the Nation Post Date:2019-11-10 12:02:47 by BTP Holdings Keywords:None Views:757 Comments:9
Does Tulsi really want to know who did 9/11?
Posted on November 6, 2019 by State of the Nation
Tulsi Demands the Truth, Send it to Her!
Submitted by Heinz Pommer with Jeff Prager to Veterans Today
Introduction by Gordon Duff with Ian Greenhalgh and Jeff Smith (Nuclear weapons designer/particle physicist)
The material here is overwhelming, hours of lectures and dozens of detailed slides. This is not an easy read. It is another piece of irrevocable proof regarding 9/11 and the use of nuclear weapons and, on its own, worth much more than just scanning or flipping through.
*
Architects and engineers say planes don’t knock down skyscrapers. Nuclear physicists say only atomic bombs can turn out this kind of heat and damage. The real investigators who were silenced by a grand jury and a wealth of threats said it was a conspiracy and named lots of names, some expected, some not. Now an independent physicist has proven the work done by the original investigators who were silenced and much new work as well. His modeling and detail is breathtaking.
We were recently introduced to the work of Germany physicist Heinz Pommer. I chose to contact him. His work deeply parallels work done by the US Department of Energy and IAEA which was censored and suppressed so that the fake 9/11 report could be published and blame put on Iraq and Afghanistan.
Unlike Pommer’s work (aided by Jeff Prager), the VT team included some of those involved in the ill fated original investigation. Working from different data, to an extent, both teams have ended up with nearly identical results. www.veteranstoday.com/201...e-secret-history-of-9-11/
VT knows the who, how and when from official sources. Pommer (and Prager), however, have taken their portion a step further and have produced what the original team would have presented to congress and the president, had they been allowed, of the proofs of nuclear weapons and their effects. Their work is identical to the secret work by the DOE and Sandia National Labs but adds much as well.
Included are video presentations sent by Pommer to me and his PDF slides. This material has been submitted to the US team and we will get their comments.
6.3 Demon’s trap 9/11
Your mind is not your consciousness. Your consciousness is your state or quality of awareness of your existence, of being a person.
Your mind, however, can be hijacked and controlled. Your thoughts can be guided to this and that, and finally your mind might simply play the role of an uneducated dog. It barks a lot: “be aware, intruders!”
If your mind is bent the right way (in the sense of the perpetrators of 9/11) you will accept nothing except the fairy tale of Osama bin Laden. Then your mind and your thoughts will clutch and grasp to the last straws, in order to save your world view. It will accept nothing, least of all an offending truth.
Truth, however, is important. So, lets start this subchapter rendering homage to one great defender of the truth, Saint Augustine of Hippo.
While we would all like to see a candidate come out and declare the towers could not have fallen due to plane strikes alone and poll double digits in popularity and get positive MSM coverage, the reality is.... that will never happen until 911 truth goes mainstream. It ain't there yet.
If Tulsi were to come out and declare such a thing, she'd be political dead meat. That's the reality. The best that we will ever get is a candidate that is not part of the system, and Tulsi has gone about as far as any 911 truther could go in demanding declassification while still getting media attention. To suggest she should go farther ignores political reality.
We can cheer for a candidate that goes completely against what MSM claims and what only average Americans believe, but then we're cheering for a candidate that will only ever get write-in votes, which does no good whatsoever.
We don't know how far Tulsi really believes things, but we can say her public stance is about the best that could be hoped for in a viable candidate.