[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: Photographer: Herald got it right (ON SCALIA'S GESTURE) Photographer: Herald got it right By Marie Szaniszlo Amid a growing national controversy about the gesture U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia made Sunday at the Cathedral of the Holy Cross, the freelance photographer who captured the moment has come forward with the picture. Its inaccurate and deceptive of him to say there was no vulgarity in the moment, said Peter Smith, the Boston University assistant photojournalism professor who made the shot. Despite Scalias insistence that the Sicilian gesture was not offensive and had been incorrectly characterized by the Herald as obscene, the photographer said the newspaper got the story right. Smith said the jurist immediately knew hed made a mistake, and said, Youre not going to print that, are you? Scalias office yesterday referred questions regarding the flap to Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg, who said a letter Scalia sent Tuesday to the Herald defending his gesture at the cathedral speaks for itself. He has no further comment, Arberg said. Smith was working as a freelance photographer for the Boston archdioceses weekly newspaper at a special Mass for lawyers Sunday when a Herald reporter asked the justice how he responds to critics who might question his impartiality as a judge given his public worship. The judge paused for a second, then looked directly into my lens and said, To my critics, I say, Vaffanculo, punctuating the comment by flicking his right hand out from under his chin, Smith said. The Italian phrase means (expletive) you. Yesterday, Herald reporter Laurel J. Sweet agreed with Smiths account, but said she did not hear Scalia utter the obscenity. In his letter, Scalia denied his gesture was obscene and claimed he explained its meaning to Sweet, a point both she and Smith dispute. Scalia went on to cite Luigi Barzinis book, The Italians, which describes a seemingly different gesture - the extended fingers of one hand moving slowly back and forth under the raised chin - and its meaning - I couldnt care less. Its no business of mine. Count me out. How could your reporter leap to the conclusion (contrary to my explanation) that the gesture was obscene? Scalia wrote. Quite easily, according to experts, even if the justice had offered more than a two-word explanation - Thats Sicilian - Sunday. There is no answer to what it really means, because those gestures have different meanings in different locations, even in neighbouring locations, said Janet Bavelas, a University of Victoria, British Columbia, psychologist who has studied human gestures. The gesture typically means I dont know in Portugal, No! in Naples, You are lying in Greece and I dont give a damn in northern Italy, France and Tunisia, said David B. Givens of the Center for Nonverbal Studies in Spokane, Wash.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
#7. To: aristeides (#0)
As a NYC born and bred "virtual Italian," I can attest that the chin-flicking gesture is not that aggressive---certainly not as aggressive as the bras d'honneur "hooked fist salute." Of course, if you're looking to take offense, like the press certainly seems to be doing, you can interpret it as meaning "Fuck off!" which is definitely a nuance of "Vaffanculo!" Offense has to be taken as well as given, you know.
What a handsome pair of butt buddies. I now pronounce you...man and..husband?
Yes..they make just the cutest couple.. GACK..
There are no replies to Comment # 18. End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|