JEWISH INROADS into British Royalty Remarks by The Hon. J. Thorkelson of Montana in the British House of Commons
(Wednesday, August 21, 1940)
JEWISH INROADS INTO BRITISH ROYALTY UP TO THE YEAR 1937
It has long been one of the Jewish methods in the attainment of world domination to penetrate into privileged circles where political power is greatest: Edward the First, by expelling the Jews in 1290, saved us from too early an application of this process in Britain, but the other countries were less fortunate and suffered the extinction of their nobility by Jewish women marrying into the Gentile aristocratic families.
In Britain a few "damped" (baptized Christian) Jews remained in the country when their synagogue-going brothers had been expelled.
Some of these attained knighthood, for instance, Sir Edward Brampton, who became Governor of Guernsey. The first serious attempt, however, to penetrate the ranks of the hereditary Titleholders of England seems to have been an attack upon royalty itself by that notorious character, Perkin Warbeck, who was a servant of the knight mentioned above.
With characteristic Jewish effrontery, this man claimed the English throne.
Francis Bacon wrote in his Life of King Henry the VII: "There was a townsman of Tourney that had born office in that town, whose name was John Osbeck, a convert Jew, married to Catherine de Faro; whose business drew him to live for a time with his wife at London, in King Edward IV's days.
During which time he had a son by her; and being known in court, the King either out of religious nobleness, because he was a convert, or upon some private acquaintance, did him the honor as to be godfather to his child. and named him Peter.
But afterwards proving a dainty and effeminate youth, he was commonly called by the diminutive of his name. Peterkin or Perkin. For, as for the name of Warbeck, it was given him when they did but guess at it, before examinations had been taken.
For how many of us at school realized that Perkin Warbeck was a figure in the Jewish world plot against us, Sovereignty?
As everyone knows, Cromwell allowed the Jews to return and they flocked over here toward the latter part of the seventeenth century, the largest wave of rich Jews coming over with William III from Holland.
In 1718 the Attorney General, Sir R. Raymond, hammered another nail into his country's coffin. By deciding that Jews could hold land in England. Walpole had previously allowed the Jew Gideon to hold estates by a special act in his favor: this Jew had lent his "credit" to the government (!) which seems not to have realized that it had a lot of its own.
And falsely posing as a Christian, for he never ceased his payments to the synagogue and died a Jew, he married a Gentile, his son being created a baronet and later Baron, Eardley, a title now fortunately extinct. The first synagogue Jew baronets were Sir I. L. Goldsmid (1841), Sir Moses Montefiore, and Sir Anthony de Rothschild; these seem to have qualified for British aristocracy by using their ill-gotten wealth in buying privileges for the Jews in this and other countries.
It was Sir Issac . Goldsmid who led the movement for the admission of the Jews to our legislature. Once the barrier was down the rest was easy.
In 1858 legislation enabled the foreign "baron" Lionel de Rothschild to take his oath in the house of Commons as a Jew. His son was raised to the peerage in 1885, the "damped" Jew Disraeli had of course obtained earlier honors, dying as the Earl of Beaconsfield. Among the earlier Synagogue baronet creations were those of Sir George Jessel, Sir David Salomans, and Sir John Simon (no relation to the living Sir John Simon, who claims not to be Jewish).
British peers sometimes made matters worse by marrying Jewesses, one of the most disastrous cases being that of the second Viscount Galway, who married as early as 1747 a Jewess called Villa Real, as a result of which countless fine old British families have had this Asiatic strain instilled into them.
It was a Rothschild plan to marry superfluous daughters into the families of influential Gentiles; in this case of the Rothschild unions with Baron Battersea and the son of the fourth Earl of Hardwicke, the marriages were sterile, but a daughter of Mayer Amschel Rothschild married the fifth Earl of Rosebery, so that there is Rothschild blood in the present earl, one of whose sisters married the present Marquis of Crewe, himself with Villa Real blood: thus after many days, the blood of the Villa real Jewess mingles with that of the Rothschild in the issue of this marriage of "British Aristocrats".
This custom of mating with Jewesses now become a common one; the instinct of the Aryan has been broken down by continued propaganda, and H. Belloc in his book on The Jews writes of the Jewish penetration of our great aristocratic families: "With the opening of the twentieth century, those of the great territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood were the exception.
In nearly all of them the strain was more or less marked, in some of them so strong that though the name was still English and the tradition that of a purely English lineage of the long past, the physique and character had become wholly Jewish and the members of the family were taken for Jews whenever they traveled in countries where the gentry had not yet suffered or enjoyed this mixture."
A study of the "society" photographers in any copy of The Bystander will convince anyone that Mr. Belloc does not exaggerate.
To those of us who believe that Bretisation is civilization, it is incomprehensible that our aristocrats could succumb to the cunning Masonic and educational Jewish propaganda designed to cause them to forget their nation.
Nevertheless the opposition, to Jewish penetration into the great families has not been expressed in any decided way: Masonry is no doubt responsible for this - Queen Victoria herself had qualms about granting titles to Jews, because we know that when it was recommend to her that Sir Lionel Rothschild should be promoted the peerage, she wrote as follows in a letter dated November 1 1869 to Mr. Gladstone: "It is not only the feeling of which she cannot divest herself, against making a person of Jewish religion a peer, but she can not think that one who owes his great wealth to contracts with foreign governments for loans or to successful speculation the stock exchange can fairly claim a British peerage."
"However high Sir L. Rothschild may stand personally in public estimation, this seems to be not the less a species of gambling because it is on a gigantic scale and far removed from that legitimate trading which she delights to honor, in which men have raised themselves by patient industry and unswerving probity to positions of wealth and influence."
Her sound instincts, or "prejudices" as they would be called nowadays in our Judaized press, were however broken down by Disraeli and we have now reached such a pitch that in 1932 the Jews were seriously planning to get the chief rabbi into the House of Lords, ex-officio.
In 1915 a daughter of the fourth Baron Sheffield married the Jew Edwin Montague, the disturber of Indian "pathetic contentment,' and actually "embraced Judaism" also in the religious sense. There was more excuse for Lord George Gordon of the 1780 anti-Popery campaign, who adopted the Jewish religion but died insane.
In the following review of our titled aristocracy, there are many errors of omission; working chiefly with Burke's Peerage, we find a reticence on the subject of Jewish "relativity" in our nobility; in other words, the volume seems designed to baffle the investigator as much as possible.
For that reason and also because the time at our disposal for this research is strictly limited, the review is far from complete, but it is sufficiently terrible to a racist as it is.
Every effort has been made to avoid errors of commission; we do not desire to hurt the feelings of anyone, but the British people have a right to know the truth; where ever we have insufficient evidence in suspicious cases, the benefit of the doubt has been given, we hope, in many future editions, to be able to make our lists more complete.
The excellent library of he Society of Genealogists could not produce a single volume which was of direct help in collecting this material for this pamphlet, which we hope, therefore, will find a place on its shelves; but we think something will prevent it getting there.
It may be of interest to mention that Debrett's Peerage is published by the same Jew firm Odhams Press, Ltd, which runs the Daily Herald.
Sir Sidney Lee (Jew) edited the Dictionary of National Biography, so we get little help from those. And the Jew, M. Epstein, edits the Annual Register.
We have omitted from our list certain cases where Jewesses have married into noble families in which there the titles are now extinct or from which marriages there was no issue.
In our investigations we fund that the statement made by J. M. Macdiarmid in The Deer Forests that the Leveson-Gower family was descended from "a London Jew money lender" is false; the name "Levenson" in this case has no Jewish application.
Also the statement made in the Jewish Daily Post June 17, 1935, that the present Duchess of Norfold has Jewish blood is untrue. she is the second wife of the last duke and mother of the present duke; and it was the first wife of the last duke, who left no heir, who had Jewish blood. The Universe is in error in stating (Feb. 4, 1937) that the Marquis of Bute is descended from the Jew Treves.
Many Jewish titles, sometimes camouflaged like those of Barons Wandsworth (real name, Stern) and Pirbright (real name, De Worms), are fortunately extinct. Extinct, also is the baronetcy of Sir Edward Speyer, which was revoked by a notice in The Times of December 14, 1921 on account of his unlawful communicating and trading with the enemy during the war.
The effect even a slight mixture of Jewish blood in an English family is often very great. It alters the political outlook of the individual because it alters the instincts themselves.
"One Jew ancestor a long way back will undo your Anglo-Saxon composition, or which you may claim an unbroken line of purely Essex stock, more thoroughly than if all your ancestors, from your parents back had been Dutch, German, Swede, Dane, French, Russian, Portuguese, Italian or any other easily assimilated race." W. Gerbardt in Memories of a Polyglot, 1931.
When a large number of individuals in commanding social or political positions are rendered partly Asiatic in instinct, the nation itself becomes the victim of these destructive instincts.
Referring to Colonel Lane's book The Alien Menace, the nation itself becomes the victim of those destructive instincts.
"English men and women are constantly asking how it comes about that a twist is so frequently given to British policy that is clearly not in accordance with British interests.
There is usually someone in a position, at the psychological moment, to deflect our government, whatever party be in power, into some line of action that is unintelligible at the time and is fraught with disastrous consequences. * * * It is as though some hostile influence were steadily throwing grit into the machine.
In every international financial arrangement we fare badly, and the whole story of reparations and war debts is humiliating in the extreme and calculated to make us the world's laughing stock, as well as the world's milk cow.
It is in this connection that such a book as Colonel Lane has written **** throws a timely searchlight. It is in the higher ranks of society that the alien menace is formidable through the influence exercised in government departments in Downing Street and high finance by gentry of unmistakably foreign origin."
Hereditary Titleholders of Jewish Blood
(Editors Note. This book was written in 1937 and was inserted in the Congressional Record in August 1940. Because of the rapid inroads made into English Nobility in the intervening years, only the total numbers of Jewish lineage in each rank will be listed. The more a lineage becomes intermarried with Jews the faster it becomes totally Jewish. It is now almost 60 years since this book was written and doubtless Jewish inroads into the aristocracy has considerably increased.)......
Click for Full Text!
Poster Comment:
Full text at link.
See also:
Steps Toward British Union, a World State, and International Strife—Part I
REMARKS of HON. J. THORKELSON OF MONTANA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Monday, August 19.1940
Mr. THORKELSON. Mr. Speaker, In order that the American people may have a clearer understanding of those who over a period of years have been undermining this Republic, in order to return it to the British Empire, I have inserted in the RECORD a number of articles to prove this point. These articles are entitled "Steps Toward British Union, a World State, and International Strife." This is part I, and in this I include a hope expressed by Mr. Andrew Carnegie, in his book entitled "Triumphant Democracy." In this he expresses himself in this manner:
Let men say what they will, I say that as surely as the sun in the heavens once shone upon Britain and America united, so surely is it one morning to rise, to shine upon, to greet again the reunited states—the British-American Union.
This statement is clear, and the organizations which Mr. Carnegie endowed have spent millions in order to bring this about. This thing has been made possible by scholarships, exchange professors, subsidies of churches, subsidies of educational institutions; all of them working for the purpose of eliminating Americanism as was taught once in our schools and to gradually exchange this for an English version of our history.
These organizations were organized to bring about a British union, a union in which the United States would again become a part of the British Empire. However, this has been upset to some extent by the attempt of the internationalists to establish their own government as an International or world union. And there is, therefore, a conflict between the two, for England wants a British union, with America as a colony, and the international money changers want a Jewish controlled union, in order to establish their own world government.
It is, therefore, best for us to stay out of both of these, in order to save what is left of this Republic as it was given to us in 1787, by a people who knew more about international intrigue and the real problems that confronted the world, than we know today. These early founders not only understood the problems, but in drafting the Constitution they provided an instrument for us to follow, so that we could remain secure from foreign double-dealing and intrigue....
http://www.jordanmaxwell.com/images/documents/us-congressional-record-1940-british-israel-world-$1.pdf
See if you can find Sir Uncle Sam, Knight of the British Empire
Now...What About Those Pilgrims? [re the Pilgrims' Society, the Money Power]
https://watch.pairsite.com/pilgrim.html
The Untold Story of Christian Zionism’s Rise to Power in the United States
By Whitney Webb @ mintpressnews
Well before Theodore Herzl founded political Zionism and published The Jewish State, Christian Zionists in the United States and England were already seeking to direct and influence the foreign policy of both nations in service to a religious obsession end times prophecy...
https://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=226946
Next year the Pilgrims/Puritans/Separatists will have been in America for 400 years.
"... Mayflower: The Voyage That Made a Nation
Mayflower II will serve as the iconic centerpiece of the 400th Commemoration, thanks to the work of Plimoth Plantation. Planning is underway to sail the ship to Boston in the spring of 2020 and to Provincetown that fall (Mayflower II’s schedule is subject to change due to maritime and other conditions).
Visitors will be able to board the ship, hear stories about the Mayflower and her famous passengers, and imagine what it was like on board for the 66-day voyage.
• Provincetown and General Society of Mayflower Descendants Commemorative Events
The Pilgrim Monument and Provincetown Museum and the town of Provincetown will host the General Society of Mayflower Descendants for its 2020 Congress beginning on Sept. 11, 2020. Plans are also in place to welcome Mayflower II to Provincetown Harbor ahead of the event. During the visit, Mayflower II will be part of daily historical reenactments of the signing of the Mayflower Compact in Provincetown Harbor in 1620. On Sept. 13 a Memorial Service and Wreath Laying will be held, followed by a ticketed luncheon. The commemoration will culminate with a Sunrise Toast and Bon Voyage to Mayflower II on Sept. 14 as she journeys to her home port in Plymouth..."
https://www.wickedlocal.com/news/20180828/plymouths-2020-commemoration-plans-set-in-stone
Why is that significant?
IMO, they are attempting to fulfill a prophecy...Genesis 15:13-14, that was NOT fulfilled by the children of Israel in Egypt. They were in Egypt 430 years to the day, but only afflicted somewhere in the realm of 125 to 165 years, a far cry from 400 years.
I think that is why they are desperate to bring down Christian America. They are running out of time to bring in their Jew World Order on our ashes, and fulfill the prophecy which I do not believe is for them, but for Christians...in America.
WHO is Israel?
http://whoisisrael.org/seed-vs-descendants/
Genesis 15:
12And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abram; and, lo, an horror of great darkness fell upon him. 13And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; 14And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance...
https://biblehub.com/kjv/genesis/15.htm
Galatians 3:16Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. 17And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul [[annul]], that it should make the promise of none effect. 18For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise....
Sons Through Faith in Christ
26For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. 27For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. 29And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
https://www.biblehub.com/kjv/galatians/3.htm
The enduring legacy of the First Landing
Doug Phillips By Doug Phillips
Published April 27, 2007 at 1:00am
Four hundred years ago yesterday, the world changed for the better.
A cross was planted in the ground and a prayer was offered to heaven. The cross was planted literally, but it was also planted spiritually.
The event was the first landing of the Jamestown settlers. One hundred and four of them arrived at Cape Henry on April 26, 1607. We remember the event as the "First Landing," but it might be better known as "Covenant Day" for America.
The rude wooden cross they stuck in the Virginia ground was more than an ebenezer of thanksgiving to God's providence. In fact, it was an actual gauntlet thrown in the face of the enemies of Christianity. It was a legal and spiritual challenge to all comers that declared, "This land now belongs to Christ and His people."....
https://www.wnd.com/2007/04/41327/
THE UNITED STATES IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY
EXTORTING TAXES FOR THE CROWN! [[THIS TITLE SAYS IT ALL]]
A DOCUMENTARY REVIEW OF CHARTERS AND TREATIES
August 17, 1996
http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/colony1.html
See Genesis 15:13-14/Galatians 3:16,17...29 again.
That Christians are Israel is indisputable.
That America is their promised land is my opinion.
https://biblehub.com/2_samuel/7-10.htm
https://biblehub.com/ezekiel/34-13.htm
http://whoisisrael.org/seed-vs-descendants/
Think about it. Decide for yourself. I could, of course, be totally wrong.
Remember what Cornwallis told George Washington:
"..."Jonathan Williams recorded in his LEGIONS OF SATAN, 1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that,
"A holy war will now begin on America, and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom, but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown."
"Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self contradiction
"Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry." ..."
http://www.sweetliberty.org/perspective/jewishpersecution19.htm
see also http://www.sweetliberty.org/perspective/jewishpersecution18.htm
CROWNGATE: THE GREATEST CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY IN U.S. HISTORY
Posted on December 31, 2018 by State of the Nation
The British Crown, Privy Council and ‘City of London’ Effectively Rule America...
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=112432