Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

History
See other History Articles

Title: The Japanese Attack On Pearl Harbor Was About Oil
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://taskandpurpose.com/japanese-attack-pearl-harbor-oil
Published: Dec 8, 2014
Author: Stephen Carlson
Post Date: 2019-12-01 12:58:37 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 3258
Comments: 46

The Japanese Attack On Pearl Harbor Was About Oil

Stephen Carlson December 08, 2014 at 12:54 PM

The USS Arizona (BB-39) burning after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, 7 December 1941.
Photo via the National Archives and Records Administration

The “day that will live in infamy” ended with the deaths of over 2,400 sailors, Marines and soldiers, along with the heavy damage and destruction of eight battleships. The surprise attack, conducted by hundreds of Japanese aircraft flying off of four heavy aircraft carriers, catapulted the United States into a world war it had been seeking to avoid.

But the attack, which left the U.S. population in a state of shock at the time, was one that was a long time coming. Japanese relations with the United States, which had enjoyed decades of peaceful cooperation, had been deteriorating for over a decade, and in the end, an U.S. oil embargo triggered the war.

Since Japan had invaded and occupied Manchuria in 1931 and left the League of Nations in 1933, it had pursued an increasingly aggressive foreign policy. Its imperial ambitions were directed at forming a “Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere” --- a euphemism for an empire modeled on the great European powers.

Japan gradually encroached on Chinese territory, and the incident on the Marco Polo Bridge in 1937 --- where confusion over a missing Japanese soldier led to Japanese forces attacking the bridge --- sparked an all-out war with China. The Chinese were riven with internal divisions, with a civil war between the Chinese Nationalists and the Chinese Communist Party leaving them too divided to successfully fight off the Japanese.

The Japanese occupation of China was savage, with indiscriminate reprisals carried out against Chinese civilians in revenge for partisan attacks. An estimated 20 million Chinese were killed during the course of the war.

The infamous Rape of Nanjing in December 1937, where hundreds of thousands of civilians were massacred and raped after Japan occupied the Chinese capital, sparked an outcry in the West. Britain, France, and the U.S. all sent aid to China, such as military supplies and the Flying Tigers, a U.S. volunteer fighter unit, and economic sanctions began to take their toll.

The Japanese turned to the Axis, signing the Tripartite Pact with Germany and Italy in September 1940. Its division from the Allied powers was complete.

But it was the Japanese invasion of French Indochina in 1941 that finally set the stage for Pearl Harbor. Though ostensibly “allowed” by German-occupied France to take control of the colony, it was too much for the United States. President Franklin Roosevelt instituted an oil embargo and froze all Japanese assets in the U.S. in order to pressure Japan to withdraw from its conquests. Britain followed suit as well.

This was a disaster for the Japanese economy, as it lost three quarters of its overseas trade and nearly 90% of its oil imports. To the Japanese, this left them with one option: knock the United States out of the Pacific with one massive blow and secure the oil and other resources it needed by occupying South East Asia.

After the devastation at Pearl Harbor, the Japanese enjoyed great success, invading and occupying Hong Kong, Singapore, Burma, the Philippines, Malaya, and New Guinea. But despite such great initial conquests, the Japanese had started a war they could not win.

The United States was the greatest industrial power on earth, the proverbial “sleeping giant.” With its full resources mobilized and larger population, the United States could simply out produce the Japanese in every kind of war material. In 1943 alone, the United States built over 85,000 aircraft, while the Japanese built only 16,000. In the numbers game, the Japanese were doomed.

Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, the mastermind of the Pearl Harbor attack, said that in a naval war with the United States, “If I am told to fight regardless of the consequences, I shall run wild for the first six months or a year, but I have utterly no confidence for the second or third year.”

Considering the decisive Battle of Midway happened exactly six months after Pearl Harbor, where the Japanese lost four irreplaceable carriers and the tide of the war turned, Yamamoto was more prophetic than he might have wished.


Poster Comment:

Oil is the reason the U.S. invaded Iraq. Saddam was selling Iraq's oil for Euros. He said he "did not want to deal in the currency of the enemy." Saddam violated the U.S. policy of Dollar Supremacy. Saddam had to go and he did. The U.S. invasion of Iraq triggered the insurgency with roadside bombs.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

#1. To: BTP Holdings, Ada, Lod, All (#0)

Japan "lost" the war but they were the winner in the long run. More so than any other country. Thanks to MacArthur.

Cynicom  posted on  2019-12-01   13:28:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Cynicom (#1)

Germany also lost the war but soon became much more prosperous than the Brits who thought they won.

Ada  posted on  2019-12-01   13:35:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Ada, All (#2)

Germany also lost the war but soon became much more prosperous than the Brits who thought they won.

Very true...

Japan was the greatest winner because MacArthur forced them to come out of the dark ages. The peoples of Japan and Germany are industrious and dragged themselves up by the bootstraps with our help.

Side note, beginning WWII there were six major countries with dictators. At this time there are two remaining. Do you see any correlation between world strife then and now???

Cynicom  posted on  2019-12-01   13:51:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: All (#4)

Side note, beginning WWII there were six major countries with dictators. At this time there are two remaining. Do you see any correlation between world strife then and now???

My intent was strictly the political state of six countries.

WWII changed governments for the better in four countries. Germany, Japan, Italy and Spain. Eighty years later China and Russia remain dictatorships and both are a threat to world peace, both have the strength to rule or ruin the world.

The United States saved both countries from being destroyed. Both countries are godless states, determined to rule the world.

Cynicom  posted on  2019-12-02   0:12:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Cynicom (#8)

WWII changed governments for the better in four countries. Germany, Japan, Italy and Spain. Eighty years later China and Russia remain dictatorships and both are a threat to world peace, both have the strength to rule or ruin the world.

The United States saved both countries from being destroyed. Both countries are godless states, determined to rule the world.

Russia isn't a Communist dictatorship anymore or godless like it was then. Putin supports Christianity there and that's probably one of the major reasons that Leftists despise him so much.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-12-02   10:36:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: GreyLmist (#10)

Putin is an Orthordox Christian/Catholic, I think, as is much of Russia. I agree Russia is no longer communist as they now allow all adults to vote, unlike during the Communist reign where only Communist party members could vote. I can see how the accusation of Putin being a dictator can be argued given he's won the last 5 or so elections, and I have spoken with a Russian woman who says candidates not liked by their version of the Deep State are sometimes paid visits by state authorities to "discuss" their campaigns and ambitions, but.... I'm not sure how the end result is much different than here in the USA where entities like the DNC chooses their nominees while ignoring the electorate. We do have a Deep State which is basically the core of career Government workers at the top in all departments/ministries who think they know what's better for the USA than the electorate does, and implement that with the attitude that such duties are required of them and their execution could never be any violation of the law regardless of what the law says.

It's all the same crap worldwide so in my view illusioned purists in the USA have no grounds for criticizing countries like Russia and Iran for possibly having sham elections.

Pinguinite  posted on  2019-12-02   14:00:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Pinguinite (#11)

We do have a Deep State which is basically the core of career Government workers at the top in all departments/ministries who think they know what's better for the USA than the electorate does, and implement that with the attitude that such duties are required of them and their execution could never be any violation of the law regardless of what the law says.

BINGO! ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-12-02   19:28:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: BTP Holdings (#14)

History...

Want to know how military knew in advance that attack would be Pearl Harbor????

Cynicom  posted on  2019-12-02   19:31:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Cynicom (#15)

Want to know how military knew in advance that attack would be Pearl Harbor????

Code breakers had broken the Jap Naval Code well in advance of the attack.

This is why the carriers were at sea. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-12-02   19:35:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: BTP Holdings (#16)

Code breakers had broken the Jap Naval Code well in advance of the attack.

Is trick question..

How did they know would be Pearl...HARBOR...

Cynicom  posted on  2019-12-02   19:42:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Cynicom (#17) (Edited)

Is trick question..

How did they know would be Pearl...HARBOR...

The U.S. was intercepting and translating diplomatic code in Europe. They knew an attack was coming but were not sure where. They suspected Malaysia or Philippines.

They never really expected an attack at Pearl 4,000 miles away from support bases. They were truly caught off guard. FDR ordered all U.S. military be informed of pending military attacks and to prepare accordingly.

The warning message to Pearl was sent by standard mail and did not arrive until after the attack occurred.

Was it pure luck the carriers were at sea? No way to know for certain, but it was fortuitous that they were.

When you think about it, the Japs knew Pearl Harbor was the major naval base for the Pacific fleet. So why not risk it? ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2019-12-02   20:06:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: BTP Holdings (#18)

They never really expected an attack at Pearl 4,000 miles away from support bases

Seprate from all other intelligence, military by omission knew it was Pearl HARBOR. Long in advance to other intelligence.

Cynicom  posted on  2019-12-02   20:25:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: All, X-15, BTP-Holdings (#20)

George Patton in 1938 warned Washington that the enemy would be coming from the north and that we should expand our air patrols to include the north. He was ignored.

Also...intelligence was long aware that the Japanese navy was undergoing long periods of training in a far northern small unused port for training of torpedo pilots. The port...was a shallow water harbor. The question was why months of training for shallow water torpedo pilots????

If the intended enemy was the US, then the answer was clear...the US had but ONE major Harbor in the Pacific in range of Japanese carriers...PEARL HARBOR...

This and Patton was long before elint intelligence.

Cynicom  posted on  2019-12-02   20:57:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Cynicom, 4 (#21) (Edited)

Cynicom @ Post #21: George Patton in 1938 warned Washington that the enemy would be coming from the north and that we should expand our air patrols to include the north. He was ignored.

Also...intelligence was long aware that the Japanese navy was undergoing long periods of training in a far northern small unused port for training of torpedo pilots. The port...was a shallow water harbor. The question was why months of training for shallow water torpedo pilots????

If the intended enemy was the US, then the answer was clear...the US had but ONE major Harbor in the Pacific in range of Japanese carriers...PEARL HARBOR...

This and Patton was long before elint intelligence.


Cynicom @ Post #23: I forgot to add, Pearl Harbor is our one and ONLY shallow water harbor in the Pacific.


Naval Station Pearl Harbor - Wikipedia

As the Imperial Japanese military pressed its war in China, concern over Japan's intentions caused the U.S. to begin taking defensive measures. On 1 February 1933, the U.S. Navy staged a mock attack [on the base at Pearl Harbor -- the first naval exercise to test simulated aircraft carrier attacks against the west coast of the United States --] as part of a preparedness exercise.[citation needed] [citation: "More About the Rest of Us" by Carleen Shea - Pg. 76 @ books.google.com] The attack "succeeded" and the defense was deemed a "failure".


Fleet problem - Wikipedia

Fleet problem is the term used by the United States Navy to describe each of 27 naval exercises. The initial 21 of these were conducted between 1923 and 1940. They are labeled with Roman numerals, from Fleet Problem I through Fleet Problem XXI. A 22nd Fleet Problem exercise, scheduled for [the Spring of] 1941, was canceled because of World War II.

Fleet Problem XIV: Held February 10–17, 1933, ... was the first naval exercise to test simulated aircraft carrier attacks against the west coast of the United States. ... Fleet Problem XIV coincidentally occurred the month before Franklin D. Roosevelt, a former Assistant Secretary of the Navy, took the office of the presidency. ... The simulated attacks had certainly been mitigated by the defensive 'blue' fleet, however the 'black' fleet had scored key victories

[Noting: Fleet Problem XIII, March 1932 - one month after Army/Navy Grand Joint Exercise 4: The exercise showed that one carrier was insufficient for either fleet attack or area defense ... Admiral Harry E. Yarnell said that six to eight carriers would be required for a Pacific campaign, but no orders were placed for new carriers, as Depression-era financial difficulties caused President Herbert Hoover to limit naval expenses.[15] || Fleet Problem XVI, May 1935: thought to be aspects of some real naval campaign of the future in which the U.S. would take the strategic offensive. || Fleet Problem XVII, Spring of 1936: preparing the fleet for anti-submarine operations, etc. || Fleet Problem XIX, April and May 1938: tested the capabilities of the Hawaiian Defense Force.]

Fleet Problem XXI: An eight-phase operation for the defense of the Hawaiian area in April 1940.[26]


[Noting @ Wikipedia ref. for United States Pacific Fleet: Until May 1940, the Battle Force was stationed on the west coast of the United States. ... Long term basing at Pearl Harbor was so strongly opposed by the commander, Admiral James O. Richardson, that he personally protested in Washington. Political considerations were thought sufficiently important that he was relieved by Admiral Husband E. Kimmel, who was in command at the time of the attack on Pearl Harbor. ... When the attack took place, all three carriers were absent]


Japanese Mock Attack On Pearl Harbour - December 1940 (1940) - YouTube ref., 4.5 minutes | Published by British Pathé]


This is from Google's cache of: https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/2016/12/07/
pearl-harbor-75th-anniversary-world-war-ii/91973380/

For months and months, the [U.S.] Navy had been launching mock attacks, dropping flour bags on the airfield.

“We were used to seeing planes — I had no thought they weren’t ours.”


============


Attack on Pearl Harbor - Wikipedia

As early as 1924, Chief of U.S. Air Service Mason Patrick displayed a concern for military vulnerabilities in the Pacific, having sent Gen. Billy Mitchell on a survey of the Pacific and the East. Patrick called Mitchell's subsequent report, which identified vulnerabilities in Hawaii, a “theoretical treatise on employment of airpower in the Pacific, which, in all probability undoubtedly will be of extreme value some 10 or 15 years hence.” [145]

At least two naval war games, one in 1932 and another in 1936, proved that Pearl was vulnerable to such an attack. Admiral James Richardson was removed from command shortly after protesting President Roosevelt's decision to move the bulk of the Pacific fleet to Pearl Harbor.[146][147]


Admiral Harry E. Yarnell - Wikipedia

was an American naval officer whose career spanned over 51 years and three wars, from the Spanish–American War through World War II.

Among his achievements was proving, in 1932 war games, that Pearl Harbor was vulnerable to a naval aerial attack. His findings were dismissed by his superiors until the Imperial Japanese Navy's Pearl Harbor attack went just as Yarnell had predicted.
>
In February 1932, Yarnell pioneered carrier tactics in an exercise called Army/Navy Grand Joint Exercise 4. Rear Admiral Yarnell commanded the carriers Lexington and Saratoga in an effort to demonstrate that Hawaii was vulnerable to naval air power. The expectation was that Yarnell would attack with battleships, but instead he left his battleships behind and proceeded only with his carriers to the north of Hawaii where it was less likely he would be detected. With a storm as cover, at dawn on Sunday, 7 February, Yarnell’s 152 planes attacked the harbor from the northeast, just as the Japanese would ten years later. The army airfields were first put out of commission after which Battleship Row was attacked, with multiple hits on navy ships. No defending aircraft were able to launch. The Navy’s war-game umpires declared the attack a total success, prompting Yarnell to strenuously warn of the Japanese threat.[3]

The New York Times reported on the exercise, noting the defenders were unable to find the attacking fleet even after 24 hours had passed. U.S. intelligence knew Japanese writers had reported on the exercise. Ironically, in the U.S., the battleship admirals voted down a reassessment of naval tactics. The umpire's report did not even mention the stunning success of Yarnell's exercise. Instead they wrote, "It is doubtful if air attacks can be launched against Oahu in the face of strong defensive aviation without subjecting the attacking carriers to the danger of material damage and consequent great losses in the attack air force."[4]


Captain Joseph Rochefort - Wikipedia

American naval officer [who] was an expert Japanese linguist and trained cryptanalyst.

He was a major figure in the United States Navy's cryptographic and intelligence operations from 1925 to 1946, particularly in the Battle of Midway. His contributions and those of his team were pivotal to victory in the Pacific War.

Rochefort had a close working relationship with [Rear Admiral] Edwin T. Layton, whom he first met on the voyage to Tokyo where both men were sent to learn Japanese at the Navy's request. In 1941, Layton was the chief intelligence officer for Admiral Husband E. Kimmel, Commander in Chief, Pacific Fleet (CINCPAC). Both [Layton] and Rochefort were denied access to decrypts of diplomatic messages sent in [the Japanese code] Purple, the highest level diplomatic cypher, in the months before the Japanese attack, on the orders of the director of the War Plans Division, [Admiral] Richmond K. Turner.[10]

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-12-03   5:26:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: GreyLmist, All (#27)

Thanks for all that. Few will read or care.

When an army officer named Patton in 1938 warned War Dept.of what was coming, someone should have paid attention. The Navy was in charge of entire Pacific.

First land action was on Guam 8 Dec. 1941. Guam Marines were 490 in number, armed with rifles and one machine gun. Japan invaded with 5000 men, fighter aircraft, cannons and tanks. It was a slaughter.

Did we KNOW they were coming???? YES...Proof???? American military and government civilians, HAD BEEN REMOVED FROM GUAM IN JUNE 1941...

Cynicom  posted on  2019-12-03   7:36:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Cynicom (#28) (Edited)

Thanks for all that. Few will read or care.

When an army officer named Patton in 1938 warned War Dept.of what was coming, someone should have paid attention. The Navy was in charge of entire Pacific.

First land action was on Guam 8 Dec. 1941. Guam Marines were 490 in number, armed with rifles and one machine gun. Japan invaded with 5000 men, fighter aircraft, cannons and tanks. It was a slaughter.

Did we KNOW they were coming???? YES...Proof???? American military and government civilians, HAD BEEN REMOVED FROM GUAM IN JUNE 1941...

Thanks for reading and commenting, sir, and for the many instructional viewpoints on these sad subjects in search of truth about the various orchestrations of malevolence, mockeries, attacks and such that manuevered America and much of the world into disastrous wars of Global Scale twice. The world needs better defenses against the devious deliberations of War Manipulators. Charges of Crimes Against Humanity, Crimes Against Peace and War Crimes are applicable to them, imo.

Even though the post I sent was quite wordy, it would have been wordier if I, too, hadn't forgotten to include something about the shallow water issue of Pearl Harbor; as comparative to an earlier attack by the British on the night of Armistice Day: November 11–12, 1940 that destroyed half of Italy's fleet (indiana.edu ref.) anchored in its shallow water home port at Taranto. Am still working on making a revised posting later with more about that.

GreyLmist  posted on  2019-12-04   16:05:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 30.

#31. To: GreyLmist, All, noone222 (#30)

November 11–12, 1940 that destroyed half of Italy's fleet (indiana.edu ref.) anchored in its shallow water home port at Taranto.

Good heavens, good homework...

After Taranto success by the British, the Japs knew they were on the right track.

If you look the Japs had a high level spy in Brit navy that was expert on torpedo bombing. He sold all info to them. Cannot recall his name now but he was not prosecuted because he was distant member of Royal Family or some such. Memory fails me. His sellout ensured Japs success at Pearl Harbor.

Cynicom  posted on  2019-12-04 17:18:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest