Gabbards decision had much more to do with a desire to censure Trump over his real crimes: carrying out wars without congressional approval, illegally occupying and pillaging Syria, and continuing to support Saudi Arabias genocidal war in Yemen.
Along strongly partisan lines, the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump on two articles, by a total of 230-197-1 on abuse of power and 229-198-1 on obstruction of Congress. The first stems from his alleged pressuring of the Ukranian government to announce investigations into his political rival, Joe Biden. The second is because of his alleged refusal to cooperate with the investigation, withholding evidence and barring aides from testifying. The notable 1 in both counts was Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, who, instead of siding with the overwhelming majority of her fellow Democrats, voted present both times.
Gabbard, who is currently running for the Democratic presidential nomination, was roundly criticized by her party for the decision. I really think it was not a smart choice for her politically, said Rep. Pramila Jayapal (DWA), If she cant make a decision about whether to vote yes or no on these articles of impeachment, Im not sure how she intends to make those decisions in the White House. Jayapal added that she was very disappointed and considered Gabbards stance a cop out. These votes are votes of courage, they are votes of conscience
I dont think people are looking for a present vote at the moment, she concluded.
Freshman New York Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez also expressed her unease with Gabbards decision. Today was very consequential. And to not take a stand one way or another in a day of such grave consequence to this country is quite difficult. Were sent here to lead, she said.
Click for Full Text!