See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: 200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://youtu.be/-Ax_YpQsy88
Published: Dec 29, 2019
Author: Eric Dubay
Post Date: 2019-12-29 19:57:38 by wudidiz
Keywords: None
Views: 27471
Comments: 351
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-216) not displayed.
.
.
.
#217. To: NeoconsNailed (#216)
Their is a few things I can say about this. We know the ISS is up there because we can follow it's transits with our own commercially available telescopes , that said, any scrutiny applied to what they say is from the inside of the iss reveals many many issues. So the question might become, "if it is really up there what in the fuck would be the point of faking footage from the inside"? To which I would respond, why wouldn't they? Why would they reveal the inner workings of the issues to the world and public at large including enemy nations that we would rather not see utilizing our technology. I mean look at Iran. One of our server drones crashed there and with in a year they reverse engineered our predator drones. If the footage was legit and real rouge states all over would be all over that. No better survalence platform on earth or rather from low earth orbit. ______________________________________ Suspect all media / resist bad propaganda/Learn NLP everyday everyway ;) If you don't control your mind someone else will.
Gee whiz, was I trying to fool you to see who if any would catch my mistake, or did I do it by accident... I was thinking in terms of a square. But if you can see 3 miles 360 degrees, then it is not a square, it is a circle. The area of a square is the length of the square times the width, so the area A is the length * width of that square; So a 3 mile(length) * 3 mile(width) square is 9 square miles in area(A). A circle however has a different formula for area. We use the radius, 3 miles, to calculate the area as follows; Area (A) = Pi * Radius Squared (r2) So given a 3 mile radius, Area = 3.14 * (3 miles * 3 miles) = 28.6 square miles So if you were in the middle of the ocean, being 6 foot tall, you'd be able to see a total of 28.6 square miles. Gee whiz, why is that I wonder. Ever wonder why they'd position lookouts on ships into Crow's nest? Isn't math cool? What the hell are you talking about dude? Perhaps they meant the PUBLIC? I skip really whacked out videos, but if you have definitive proof of what you claim, repost it if I missed something.. I've posted it plenty -- look it up if you want (you won't). "I skip really whacked out videos" -- read my lips, these are NASA productions.
_____________________________________________________________ USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um
All we know, my friend, is that something is up there. Ample evidence -- I'd say proof -- exists that it's not what's claimed. _____________________________________________________________ USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um
Bro I'm not going to fish through 200 posts and view an unknown number of videos to try to find something close to what you're talking about. If you have proof of what you claim, you should be able to easily repost it. One question though. Why do you think men couldn't orbit the earth in a space capsule, shuttle, or space station? Because NASA says so. _____________________________________________________________ USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um
So far I've only seen YOU saying that. Post credible references if any exist. Without using that nonsensical argument, why do you think men can't orbit the earth? We can travel in planes, some of which approach the edge of space in terms of military aircraft. A space vessel is just a tightly pressured plane without wings. It's not magic bro. Search it here yourself if you're that interested (you're not). _____________________________________________________________ USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um
"Nonsensical argument" -- ROFL ROFL ROFL!!!
_____________________________________________________________ USA! USA! USA! Bringing you democracy, or else! there were strains of VD that were incurable, and they were first found in the Philippines and then transmitted to the Korean working girls via US military. The 'incurables' we were told were first taken back to a military hospital in the Philippines to quietly die. – 4um
So in other words you don't know of any evidence, or are not interested in debating the issue, you just want people to believe you without any evidence whatsoever. Sorry bro, I don't believe you. More like non-existent argument. “I am not one of those weak-spirited, sappy Americans who want to be liked by all the people around them. I don’t care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do. The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. My affections, being concentrated over a few people, are not spread all over Hell in a vile attempt to placate sulky, worthless shits.” - William S Burroughs
Just so you're acutely aware -- 'The Flat Earth Society' is CONTROLLED OPPOSITION created by The Elites, intended to make 'Flat Earth' seem kook-ish and stupid. (Most are NOT aware.) The Elite often co-opt BOTH sides. I'm sure you're aware of their ploys. This analogy works because it applies: I don't know many Third Graders who can understand learned subject matter from a senior in HS. Even if explained carefully to a Third Grader, the extra nine years of accumulated information from the HS Seniors will rarely "make sense" for obvious reasons. Ergo the Third Grader will dismiss it as "stupid." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjw_DuNkOUw NASA, their org, their "Missions," their "science," the entire Disney-like Theater: ABSOLUTELY CRUSHED and ANNIHILATED. What say you? hate to sound like a broken record, but titles, please? I can't see anything here but a message about a security certificate. does it have anything to do with "NASA's spiritual roots" and a "fixed earth"? "...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
I apologize, Kings; I shouldn't assume. I hope you can assess this or any of these amazing videos. TITLE: 'Disney Presents: NASA on Thin Ice | Buzz Aldrin and the Masonic Moon' (but it's much more than about that.) does it have anything to do with "NASA's spiritual roots" and a "fixed earth"? YES. Some necessary history is reviewed. Some Science is reviewed. And many claims and observations are reviewed AND exposed. NASA's roots are Nazi, Disney, Space Program, and Cultist "Magic"/Wizardry. https://youtu.be/ZR296RWS0yM AUTHOR'S OVERVIEW: Disney Presents: NASA on Thin Ice | Buzz Aldrin and the Masonic Moon. Disney brings the magic to life with Jack Parsons, L Ron Hubbard, Wernher Von Braun, Stanley Kubrick, Buzz Aldrin and the Apollo Program. In this video we go over the recent history of the NASA deception with a easy to follow timeline from NACA transforming into NASA to Walt Disney creating some of the very first propaganda about impossible space travel with the film 'Man in Space. Stanley Kubrick leaving us clues about filming the moon landing in room 237. They say the moon is 237,000 miles away which is why the room is called that. NASA admits on several occasions that they can't go beyond low earth orbit due to the deadly Van Allen Radiation Belt, but that's only code for the firmament / dome. We live on a level and stationary plane and we've been lied to about many things, including evolution, the moon landing, space travel, Antarctica, the shape of the earth, etc. Hollywood is constantly bomarding the minds of the masses with the idea that outer space exists in the capacity we are told by mainstream science which has been proven wrong time and time again. OTHER WELL-RESEARCHED VIDEOS BY THIS AUTHOR: The Case for Flat Earth | ODD TV Presentation: NASA Fails Again & Again | Space is Fake | Glitch on the ISS: History of Fake Space | Outer Space Does Not Exist: Flat Earth Timeline | The History of Flat Earth: A Stranger's Guide to Flat Earth | 21 Questions and Answers (Proving The Earth Is Flat): Journey to the Center of the Flat Earth | North Pole Hidden Land: Flat Earth | As Seen on TV | Movies & Television Shows: Bill Nye Indoctrinates the World | Why Flat Earth Matters: Flat Earth | Amber Plaster | Earth Not A Globe | Moana - How Far I'll Go Song: Flat Earth & Project Blue Beam: Flat Earth | Seven Planets of the Universe | The Wandering Stars: Flat Earth & the Fisheye Lens: NASA Can't Go Beyond Low Earth Orbit | Flat Earth Firmament: Flat Earth | 100% Proof Space Travel is Fake & Mars Missions are Too: ODD TV's Flat Earth Trilogy | True World, Learning Curve and Epic Deception: Neil deGrasse Tyson Exposed | Hollywood Actor: (sorry...I misspelled your name in a previous ping.)
Apparently you didn't read what was being discussed. The simple question was about posting a link to the proof of an assertion that was claimed to be the basis for the assertion. Here's a question for you. Why do objects fall to the ground if dropped? You apparently have no clue as to the fact people have known that the earth was a sphere orbiting the sun for at least 500 years. Go find a telescope and observe the stars and planets. You'll see that is the case. Also, find one with a motorized mount so that the earth's rotation doesn't make you lose track of the planet you're watching, as it'll move across the lens in seconds if you're trying to do it manually. Simple case of Mass & Density. (There is almost an hour of video that refutes it. You likely won't watch even 5 minutes of it, BUT, you just might learn something.) There is NO such thing as "Gravity." Yes, yes -- I know you're going to cite Newton. But Newton even admitted his "discovery" was just a THEORY. Right at the 4:23 mark it asserts that the video is somehow "fake" at the bottom of the screen. That is absurd. I stopped watching it there. However, the link between JPL,Crowley, and Hubbard was a very curious thing. I've known about it, but it doesn't change the fact the earth is not flat. Why do objects fall when dropped?
No. You need a force to move an object. Force is Mass * Acceleration When you push a box across the floor you have to exert a force upon that box for it to move. Does anyone disagree with the fact it takes a force to move an object?
People have merely theorized the Heliocentric model as dogma. Just as "Gravity" is a dogmatic "theory"; as are the alleged formulas for astronomical "distance," and "size" of alleged stars. It is also assumed that celestial bodies are indeed globes and NOT discs. Man can NOT see these objects in 3-D. Moreover, "stars" are not what we've been led to believe. The true shape of these objects is far from what we've been led to believe. For the vast majority of history, people have KNOWN our realm is still and un-moving. Ours is a geocentric realm. a great PLAIN. The stars? THEY move over EARTH as we remain stationary. If this wasn't the case, according to the heliocentric theory, the stars in the sky SHOULD be totally different were our alleged globe on the OTHER SIDE of the sun. (Can you explain why they remain positioned in EXACTLY THE SAME PLACE, regardless?) Moreover...because the stars remain positioned perfectly, predictably, and the SAME year in and year out, they've been used as THE perfect sky "map" from which to guide travelers or navigate the sea throughout the millennia. Go find a telescope and observe the stars and planets. You'll see that is the case. Others have done so. Repeatedly. THAT is "Science." The ABOVE is indeed proven. And yes --the ONLY celestial bodies which move opposite of the usual star paths ARE planets,, described as "wondering stars" in Scripture. (did you bother watching ANY of that vid?) What does "force" have to do with the necessity to "move an object"? What is the goal? Ok. That's acceptable science. But what's he point? And do you flat earth people not understand that the force of gravity is calculated as follows? Force of Gravity (g) = Mass (m) * Acceleration due to gravity (32 ft per second squared) This is true of earth gravity at sea level. At higher altitudes you would use the following equation to determine the force; F = G((m1* m2)/r2). Where F is force, G is the gravitational constant, m1 is the mass of object 1, and m2 is the mass of object 2. r is the distance between their centers of mass. In the formula it is squared. Is is how we put objects into space and keep them in orbit. It's also what makes plotting the trajectory of ballistic missiles difficult, as the force of gravity changes the higher the missile goes. At 4:23, what point is being made, and what context? I need more than that. (did you dismiss or discredit all of what was claimed up till that point?) the link between JPL,Crowley, and Hubbard was a very curious thing. I've known about it, but it doesn't change the fact the earth is not flat. I appreciate that you did focus on the info...and what you'd watched even to that point. I absolutely realize all of this "opposite" or new stuff related to our realm, the cosmos, theories on creation and time are challenging. (and some of it "impossible.") No one point is designed to change your mind on anything; That's all up to you. It is the eventual weight of accumulative new info and data that helped *me* understand and/or unravel/re-consider all new theories. (That the govt, MSM, academe, and PTB have been lying to us about everything is what finally led me to re-consider what I'd been told is "100% true.") I need more than that. I told you where to look. It asserts that the Gemini video of the space walk is fake. Force of Gravity (g) = Mass (m) * Acceleration due to gravity (32 ft per second squared) This is true of earth gravity at sea level. "Formulas" on a chalkboard still aren't definitive "proof" of the existence of "Gravity." There's air pressure to consider -- as well as mass and density in relation to the mass and density of surrounding media. It IS. But for the sake of argument, do you believe the "space walk" event is occurring in low earth orbit? There are lots of things that are well known and established fact. Don't confuse the fantasy realm with the objective world we live in. There are some that have dabbled into things that they shouldn't have. Perhaps for that reason we have some extremely evil people running things. But the earth is still a sphere, and the sun is but one star out of an unimaginable number. You would still have gravity in a vacuum. That and density does not affect the weight. Mass is the amount of matter regardless of the weight, as weight is actually the force of gravity upon that object. You see, in English units we actually use the force of gravity upon the object as a measure of its weight, not mass. In Metric units, we use the actual mass of the object and represent it in grams. Kilograms (1000)gram units are more generally used, especially in scientific calculations, where the MKS (Meters, Kilograms, and seconds) are the established units for distance, mass, and time. Weight in the Metric system is measured in Newtons. Weight is Force, in this case the force of gravity. But any force is measured in Newtons. It is curious...(don't forget the Disney link) The dot-connection of Satanists-Cultists speaks to the motives and deception of the same birds of a feather. The origins of NASA and "space" travel is curious. Their goal was to access the realm beyond the physical, which they knew intersected with the spiritual realm. I realize you disbelieve the Bible, but the description of our realm is discussed throughout in Scripture. It speaks of God's "Firmament," which according to the Bible is a "Glass Dome" of sorts. WITHIN this Firmament is (according to Scripture as well as many observers as late as the 1930s) lie the Sun and Moon. IF those like JPL, Crowley, Hubbard and Disney ALL had a goal to try and crash through The Firmament, aka God's "Glass Dome" (to either prove OR disprove God's word), THAT provides a motive.
Comments (257 - 351) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#218. To: All, wudidiz, Liberator (#211)
(Edited)
So if you're in the middle of the ocean and you're 6 feet tall, you can only see an area of about 9 square miles.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination 
#219. To: NeoconsNailed (#216)
(Edited)
Am eagerly awaiting your explanation why NASA spokesmen including astronots are yammering about finally getting people into outer space as if Apollo never existed.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#220. To: FormerLurker (#219)
#221. To: titorite (#217)
We know the ISS is up there
#222. To: NeoconsNailed (#220)
(Edited)
I've posted it plenty -- look it up if you want (you won't). "I skip really whacked out videos" -- read my lips, these are NASA productions.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#223. To: FormerLurker (#222)
One question though. Why do you think men couldn't orbit the earth in a space capsule, shuttle, or space station?
#224. To: NeoconsNailed (#223)
Because NASA says so.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#225. To: NeoconsNailed (#223)
Because NASA says so.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#226. To: FormerLurker (#224)
Post credible references if any exist.
#227. To: FormerLurker (#225)
#228. To: NeoconsNailed (#226)
Search it here yourself if you're that interested (you're not).
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#229. To: NeoconsNailed (#227)
"Nonsensical argument" -- ROFL ROFL ROFL!!!
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#230. To: FormerLurker (#229)
#231. To: Dakmar (#230)
#232. To: NeoconsNailed (#227)
(Edited)
"Nonsensical argument"
#233. To: NeoconsNailed, wudidiz, titorite, AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, noone (#226)
#234. To: NeoconsNailed, wudidiz, titorite, AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, noone, Dakmar, All (#233)
#235. To: Liberator (#234)
#236. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, NeoconNailed, wudiziz (#235)
hate to sound like a broken record, but titles, please? I can't see anything here but a message about a security certificate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8udts...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nS0VN...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ss7QT...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIB2U...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0xCl...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRhZI...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jnse...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jyLG...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ5HJ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFFM3...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQQOh...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXkCg...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fmoiw...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9i97...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARp2j...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcqFD...
#237. To: wudidiz (#236)
#238. To: Liberator, NeoconsNailed (#232)
I don't know many Third Graders who can understand learned subject matter from a senior in HS. Even if explained carefully to a Third Grader, the extra nine years of accumulated information from the HS Seniors will rarely "make sense" for obvious reasons. Ergo the Third Grader will dismiss it as "stupid."
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#239. To: Liberator (#236)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#240. To: FormerLurker (#238)
Why do objects fall to the ground if dropped?
#241. To: Liberator (#234)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#242. To: Liberator (#240)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#243. To: Liberator (#240)
Simple case of Mass & Density.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#244. To: All (#243)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#245. To: FormerLurker (#239)
You apparently have no clue as to the fact people have known that the earth was a sphere orbiting the sun for at least 500 years.
#246. To: FormerLurker (#243)
You need a force to move an object.
#247. To: FormerLurker (#243)
When you push a box across the floor you have to exert a force upon that box for it to move.
#248. To: All (#244)
(Edited)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#249. To: FormerLurker (#241)
...it asserts that the video is somehow "fake" at the bottom of the screen. That is absurd.
#250. To: Liberator (#249)
At 4:23, what point is being made, and what context?
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#251. To: FormerLurker (#248)
(Edited)
And do you flat earth people not understand that the force of gravity is calculated as follows?
#252. To: FormerLurker (#250)
It asserts that the Gemini video of the space walk is fake.
#253. To: Liberator (#249)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#254. To: Liberator (#251)
There's air pressure to consider -- as well as mass and density in relation to the mass and density of surrounding media.
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#255. To: Liberator (#251)
(Edited)
"After tomorrow those SOB's will never embarrass me again. That’s not a threat. That’s a promise.” – LBJ to his mistress Madeleine Brown on the eve of JFK assassination
#256. To: FormerLurker (#249)
the link between JPL,Crowley, and Hubbard was a very curious thing.
.
.
.