[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Israel/Zionism See other Israel/Zionism Articles Title: Jews are Doing Nothing to Prevent Crown Heights Pogrom 2.0 Black violence against Jews is escalating rapidly in the New York Metro area. And the Jews are doing the only thing they know how to do: whine and demand that the goyim do something. AP: When a suspect walked into the home of a rabbi celebrating Hanukkah and stabbed five celebrants it was the latest in a week of anti-Semitic attacks in the nations most demographically diverse area and an incident that reverberated across the country. Again, here we are: mourning another act of senseless anti-Semitic violence committed against our community and praying for those who were the victims of this hate, Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said in a statement Sunday following the attack a day earlier in Monsey, New York. This is at least the 10th anti-Semitic incident to hit the New York/New Jersey area in just the last week. When will enough be enough? These heinous attacks make something abundantly clear: The Jewish community needs greater protection, Greenblatt said. This was an attack on the house of an individual Jew. The US government is willing to spend insane amounts of money on the Jews theoretically, they are willing to spend all the money on the Jews but the idea of a police officer being put outside of the house of every individual Jew is just not even theoretically possible. But that must be what Greenblatt is demanding when he blames the goyim for not protecting the house of a single Jew that got rushed by a single black guy. Right? What else could he be demanding? Since the Dec. 10 massacre at a kosher grocery store in New Jersey there have been 19 anti-Semitic incidents in the U.S., including 16 in New York and New Jersey, according to the ADLs Tracker of Anti-Semitic Incidents. The tracker is a compilation of recent cases of anti-Jewish vandalism, harassment and assault reported to or detected by the group. Most concerning: Ten of those incidents have occurred in New York since Dec. 23 and involved assaults or threatened violence. The ADL defines assaults as incidents where peoples bodies are targeted with violence accompanied by evidence of anti-Semitic animus or in a manner that attacks Jews for their religious affiliation. Just so you understand, because the media is leaving this detail out: 100% of these incidents have been done by black people. Its an interesting detail to leave out. Because even if race doesnt exist, it is not statistically possible that this is all a coincidence. The AP piece goes on for many paragraphs recording the whining of Jews before finally coming to something to do with black people. The Congressional Caucus on Black-Jewish Relations condemned the Monsey attack in the strongest possible terms and said the surge in anti-Semitic attacks is a disturbing trend both here in the United States and abroad. The National Action Network founded by Rev. Al Sharpton is planning a news conference Monday with black religious and civil rights leaders and Jewish allies to denounce anti-Semitism. But one Jew quoted actually says something smart. Still, noted Mark S. Bloom, rabbi at Temple Beth Abraham in Oakland, California: You cant up security every time an incident happens because they happen so often. No, you cannot have infinite security, which is what appears to be the only plan of the ADL. What could be happening is that the Jews could be facing another Crown Heights pogrom. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
#2. To: Ada (#0)
Still, noted Mark S. Bloom, rabbi at Temple Beth Abraham in Oakland, California: You cant up security every time an incident happens because they happen so often." Actually, it's beyond stupid. Arm up, morons. Study the video of the church shooting in north TX, learn, if you can.
The difference is in the state law--Texas allows and NYC does not. And the Monsey attack was gunless.
What the hell difference did that make to the stupidly defenseless creatures inside the residence? Would they have preferred to be shot as opposed to sliced, diced and stabbed?
If the Hasids were known to own shotguns, the guy with the knife would not have invaded.
#6. To: Ada (#5)
OK, finally, you meant that the Monsey attack victims were gunless/defenseless. Got it.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|