[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Iran receives 40 Chinese J10-C Fighter Jets

China’s Railgun Is Now Battle-Ready, Thanks to Nuclear Power

Chinese Hypersonic Advancements! Deadly new missile could decimate entire US fleet in 20 minutes

Iran Confirms Massive Chinese HQ 9 B Missile Deal

Why Is Europe Hitting 114°F And Still Rising?

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: New Bill to Allow Cops to Detain Citizens, Force Them to Explain Who They Are, What They’re Doing
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://thefreethoughtproject.com/b ... s-police-state-powers-to-cops/
Published: Jan 23, 2020
Author: Matt Agorist
Post Date: 2020-01-23 09:57:13 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 1357
Comments: 25

Kentucky — An ominous bill that is currently making its way through the Kentucky Senate aims to give police unprecedented unconstitutional powers. These new powers will allow cops to stop anyone they want and demand that person tell them who they are, where they are going, and explain their actions. Naturally, it has civil rights advocates up in arms, but it doesn’t seem to be slowing down the bill’s momentum.

Police merely need to make an unsubstantiated claim that a person is involved in criminal activity which gives them free reign to stop that person, demand his name, home address and age — as well as ask to see his driver’s license, if he has one — and tell him to explain what he is presently doing “to the satisfaction of the officer.”

If you invoke your constitutional right not to answer the officer’s questions, this new bill grants cops the right to detain you for two hours. Even more ominous is the fact that this detainment is not considered an arrest so you have no right to an attorney and police don’t even have to record it. This non-arrest grey area detention will undoubtedly be rife for abuse.

Nevertheless, advocates for the police state tyranny say cops must have this new ability—to keep us safe. As Kentucky.com reports, Sen. Stephen Meredith, R-Leitchfield, said Grayson County law enforcement officials asked him for the bill after a number of local incidents showed the need for it.

“If a man acts suspicious, then why wouldn’t you want to know what his name is?” Meredith said in an interview. “I can’t imagine any legitimate reason in the world why a person would refuse to give their name and photo identification to a police officer if they were asked.”

In other words, if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear…or, in other words, submit to the police state. Wrong!

Well Sen. Meredith, we’d like to educate you in why a person would refuse to talk to police—because it is our right not to! Legislation like this is straight out of the playbook of every tyranny in history. Remember “Ihre Papiere, Bitte”?

That phrase often brought shudders to the people who heard it in the 1930s and ’40s. It is German for “Your papers, please,” and this bill is nearly identical to that sinister Nazi policy.

Critics of the bill are pointing out its obvious unconstitutional nature and note out how cops can already go after people if they suspect them of committing a crime. As Kentucky.com reports:

Critics say Meredith’s bill would violate the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable search and seizure and the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination.

Police officers already have the right to approach people on the street and ask their names, but it’s established that citizens can refuse to respond, said Aaron Tucek, a legal fellow at the ACLU of Kentucky. If police can show reasonable suspicion that someone is carrying a deadly weapon, they can proceed to frisk that person, Tucek said.

But they cannot detain people simply for not identifying themselves or explaining their activities “to the satisfaction of the officer,” Tucek said.

“The whole section of the bill on detention — they can call it whatever they want, but Supreme Court case law is pretty clear that an arrest is not determined by whether you call it an arrest, it’s determined by the restraint you place on someone’s liberty,” Tucek said. “If you put someone in the back of a police car or if you take them down to the police station or if you otherwise refuse to let them go their own way, that’s an arrest, and in our country, you cannot do that without probable cause.”

We agree and so does the constitution.

“The idea that we can detain people because we find them to be suspicious and we think they might commit a crime, that crosses a dangerous line,” Rebecca DiLoreto, who lobbies in Frankfort for the Kentucky Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said. “Now, unfortunately, it has been known to happen. Sometimes it’s in a mostly white community where someone spots a black person walking down the street and they get suspicious and call police.”

“The ‘crime’ in this case is basically that you’re here and we don’t think, from looking at you, that you should be here,” she added. “The potential for abuse in that seems obvious.”

DiLoreta also pointed out the menacing nature of cops being able to essentially kidnap anyone they want for hours and keep it off the record. Nobody ever should be taken into police custody without a record being made of it, she said.

“That’s starting to approach what you see in a police state or Soviet Russia,” DiLoreta said

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

#10. To: Mr. and Mrs. Grundy (#0)

'Free Rein' or 'Free Reign'?

I am so glad to see this discussed. People's English is so sloppy anymore.

Yeah, I deliberately use the word 'anymore' because English needs a word for "unlike formerly", and see nothing wrong with working to standardize that one ;-)

Similarly, I accept the use of the word 'forthcoming' to the effect of 'forthright' now. It brought cringes when people started saying it about 25 years ago but I actually think it fits. It's undoubtedly on its way to an official meaning.

'Free rein' is a different story. Long may its proper spelling reign!

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2020-01-24   19:57:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: NeoconsNailed (#10)

People's English is so sloppy anymore.

That usage of "anymore" to mean "nowadays" or "these days" pops up a lot in colloquial English.

There's resistance to using it this way because "any more" spelled as two words is reserved as a complement to the negative as in "People's English is not so sloppy anymore."

I think that it keeps popping up so often is that it bumps up against the common binary logic of standard construction and draws extra attention to the notion that the speaker is trying to get across like, "Customer service is just terrible anymore."

But hey, that's the way language changes. There ain't no accounting for the way folks get their ideas across - anymore. : )

randge  posted on  2020-01-25   11:45:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: randge (#14)

One of my favorite funny cases shows that usage is king no matter what anybody thinks of it:

www.dictionary.com/browse/auger?s=t

ORIGIN OF AUGER. before 900; Middle English nauger (a nauger misdivided as an auger.) :-D

Then there's that other quirk about any + more. People will thoughtlessly write "Are there anymore items" or whatever, cf. 'alot' for 'a lot'.

Am told the PA Dutch have a funny but useful equivalent to the French "n'est-ce pas" -- "ain't", as in "You mowed both yards, ain't?" LOL!

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2020-01-25   12:23:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 19.

#20. To: NeoconsNailed (#19)

PA Dutch

The Amish are from Pennsylvania Dutch. They have some neat quirks in their language. The also run puppy mills which I do not really approve of.

Our High School play in 1972 was Plain and Fancy about the Amish. ;)

BTP Holdings  posted on  2020-01-25 12:42:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: NeoconsNailed (#19)

"You mowed both yards, ain't?" LOL!

That's a good one. You hear Brit's doing a tag question something like that with i'nit, or however that's spelled (or spelt). As in "That the way to do it, i'nit?

I hadn't heard of "nauger," but I know "an adder" re-bracketed from "a nadder," and "an apron" from "a napron."

I think that if English is around 75 years from now, we'll have a hard time following it. Imagine Geo Washington watching TV today. Of course I don't think we've got a lot to worry about on that score.

randge  posted on  2020-01-25 12:54:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]