[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: Impeachment Trial: Whew! Republican Senators Figured out the Farce After All Impeachment Trial: Whew! Republican Senators Figured out the Farce After All Posted at 12:30 pm on February 2, 2020 by Stu Cvrk Like many Americans, I watched the Senate impeachment trial with great trepidation while wondering whether the Republican senators would be able to withstand the daily barrage of lies from the Democrat impeachment managers, Democrat senators, and Democrat operatives in the legacy media. Twelve sitting Republican senators did not endorse Candidate Trump in 2016, as discussed here in a December article. Would they cave to the pressure, or would the righteousness of the President’s case as presented by his legal team bring them into the light? I was on tenterhooks for days during the runup to the vote on witnesses on Friday, but the dam began to break as, one by one, several wavering Republican senators announced that they were going to vote against witnesses. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) was the key announcement, as Willard Romney (RINO-UT) and Susan Collins (RINO-ME) had previously announced that there were going to vote with the Democrats in favor of breaking precedent and turning the Senate into an investigative body instead of a jury. The final 51-49 vote against new witnesses was a vast relief although it is foolish to think that the Democrats and legacy media have just thrown in the towel and won’t try other theatrics to derail matters between now and the final vote on acquittal on Wednesday. That said, it is very instructive to examine the recent public statements of a few Republican senators who were undecided about witnesses until the very end in order to discern their motivations. In doing so, it is apparent that most of them really understood the hyper-partisan nature of this impeachment and were appalled by the Democrats’ political attacks and attempts at destroying Senate traditions and prerogatives as defined by the Constitution. The first ray of sunshine began with Martha McSally’s (R-AZ) declaration on 29 Jan: twitter.com/SenMcSallyAZ/status/1222717150034567169 I have heard enough. It is time to vote. The House Democrats have repeatedly claimed their case has overwhelming evidence—the same House Democrats who could have handled this matter through a bipartisan oversight process. A dangerous precedent will be set if we condone a rushed, partisan House impeachment with no due process that shuts down the Senate for weeks or months to do the House’s work. After two weeks in the Senate, 13 witnesses, and 28,000 pages of evidence, it is time for the Senate to vote and return its focus to the priorities of the American people… McSally nailed it! A “rushed, partisan House impeachment with no due process.” Next came an official public statement from Lamar Alexander (R-TN) early on 30 Jan. After claiming that in his view that the House managers “proved their case against the President,” he concluded his announcement with these words: The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did. I believe that the Constitution provides that the people should make that decision in the presidential election that begins in Iowa on Monday. The Senate has spent nine long days considering this ‘mountain’ of evidence, the arguments of the House managers and the president’s lawyers, their answers to senators’ questions and the House record. Even if the House charges were true, they do not meet the Constitution’s ‘treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors’ standard for an impeachable offense. The framers believed that there should never, ever be a partisan impeachment. That is why the Constitution requires a 2/3 vote of the Senate for conviction. Yet not one House Republican voted for these articles. If this shallow, hurried and wholly partisan impeachment were to succeed, it would rip the country apart, pouring gasoline on the fire of cultural divisions that already exist. It would create the weapon of perpetual impeachment to be used against future presidents whenever the House of Representatives is of a different political party. Our founding documents provide for duly elected presidents who serve with ‘the consent of the governed,’ not at the pleasure of the United States Congress. Let the people decide. At least Alexander got the most important part of his statement right – “If this shallow, hurried and wholly partisan impeachment were to succeed, it would rip the country apart ….” Far from being a Trump political ally, even he was able to discern the rabidly partisan and ahistorical nature of the Democrats’ impeachment gambit and refused to be a part of turning impeachment into a tactical political weapon to be used against future presidents. Good on ya, Senator! Then came the key and deciding announcement from Lisa Murkowski later on 30 Jan: Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
#1. To: BTP Holdings (#0)
Exceptin' for that reptile from Utah. Romney hides behind the Mormon underwear and stabs the President in the back.
Mitt is one Rat Fuck. He got on his knees back when he was begging Trump to Please come to Utah and campaign for me , well Trump did that and Mitt has now proven what a shithead he truly is. Never could stand the SOB I'd enjoy slapping the taste outta of his bitch mouth
There are no replies to Comment # 2. End Trace Mode for Comment # 2.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||