Title: A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words (PT 14 & 15) Source:
YT URL Source:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-Y9cy6ujvc Published:Dec 8, 2019 Author:ThePotter'sClay Post Date:2020-02-13 11:45:56 by Liberator Keywords:TRUTH, EARTH, FLAT, NASA Views:1455 Comments:30
Part 14: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-Y9cy6ujvc
Part 15: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQV1I3T-XC8
Memes are effective and popular in that don't require much time and patience, yet....they provide instant, extensive information from which to process.
These memes (Part 14 & 15) are the last in a series that thus far. They focus on Realm-Truths, reinforcing real-world observations, exposing and challenging life-long mental imprinting & programming, the scriptural reinforcement of our realm & reality, and...Common Sense.
The 'ThePottersClay' YouTube website is a very worthy source of truth -- whether from a Christian viewpoint or secular viewpoint.
What do sunrays and railroad tracks have in common?
Both are parallel.
Parallel sunrays. Yes. In certain cases. (Btw, how does one explain hundreds of miles of parallel train tracks AND no allowance made for any curve IF the earth's supposed curve is a given?)
The sun's rays present a few conundrums for the realm/science curious...
Parallel sunlight (especially shining on water lower in the sky) that is viewed straight from the horizon all the way to the observer on the beach is not possible were this realm were a globe; It's only possible on a FLAT surface. (Yes, I've watched several vids on this exact subject as well.)
With respect to the sun's "parallel" rays, yes, they *may* look parallel, but then again, at times not so much.
Ever hear of "Crepuscular Rays"? (I've quickly found these two vids):
Moreover...those "Crepuscular Rays" as seen shining through the clouds? They can only be the result of a *local* sun -- not one that's 93 million miles away. Triangulation measurements indicate the sun is actually only around 3,000 miles away from earth, and within the Firmament. (I know, I know ;-)
Yes. IF the Sun were actually 785,000 sq mi in circumference. :-)
Ever hear of the theory that the Sun/Moon are plasma? That the Moon is NOT "solid"?
IF we allow ourselves to consider theories outside and beyond the usual mental barriers/box, the case made for so many OTHER theories start to make sense -- or at least warrant further consideration and research.
(For instance, it's very difficult to alter our long established hard-wired default "education" of "established science." So yes, a local, moon-sized Sun AND notion that the entire "Cosmos" including Mercury, planets and stars lie *within* the Firmament dome as described in the Bible is an alternative model many are trying to understand and embrace as possible.)
Back on track...
In order to help explain their model of the cosmos -- as well both the distance and size of the Sun (vs the Moon) -- the scientists/mathematicians during the 1500s-1900s engaged in many theoretical, voodoo math/science formulas. For distance to the moon, sun, planets and stars (especially impossible), they barrow on Eratosthenes' theory and calculations.