[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

EVERYTHING IS ELECTRIFYING! Volcanic Eruptions and Stormquakes Strike as Solar Activity EXPLODES

Why Some LA Biz Owners Want To Leave Because Of The Riots, But Can't

As conflict with Iran escalates, hundreds of Israelis quietly flee by yacht to Europe

Inside the clashes between Trump and Gabbard

Joe Rogan Reacts to Senator Hawley Wrecking CEO

Brave New World Order: Digital Oligarchs And The Rise Of The Algorithmic Leviathan

Iran's ruling clerics have 48 hours to save themselves from US military onslaught,

JP Morgan CEO says Americans need to stockpile guns and ammo

General Wesley Clark "Seven Countries in Five Years" [

Worlds first 6G electronic warfare weapon by China can jam F-35 radar in seconds

Electric vehicles collect huge amounts of data including psychological, genetic and health information

White fibrous clots found in 3-year-old child born to mother who was covid vaccinated while pregnant

​​​​​​​Strait Of Hormuz Disruption Fears Surge After Former Iranian Minister Threatens Transit Restrictions

PauL Joseph Watson: The Biggest Cover-Up Ever

Are we ignoring global seismic warnings?

Gold vs The Dollar: The Death Of Fiat In One Chart

Is 4um mail Tango-Uniform (tits-up)?

Kash Patel EXPOSES Van Hollen’s Hidden Agenda—Congress Erupts!

BREAKING: Trump says US has complete control over Iranian skies

Iran issues urgent warning to Israelis: Leave Haifa and Tel Aviv

Senate Version Of 'Big Beautiful Bill' Sets Up Showdown With House Over Taxes, Medicaid And SALT

War Powers Resolutions Introduced In Congress To Prevent US War With Iran

#BREAKING: DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has been rushed to the hospital in DC

Iran says parliament is preparing bill to leave nuclear non-proliferation treaty

Asia Moves Forward to Ditch Dollar: 50% Crash by 2030 Expected?

An Israeli missile interceptor has malfunctioned and crashed in Tel Aviv, according to initial reports.

SIXTY-PERCENT (60%) of ALL Israeli Fuel Supply - OFFLINE

Tucker and Steve Bannon React to New Developments in Iran-Israel Conflict

Russian and Chinese Military Cargo Planes Shuttling weapons, Missiles, Supplies into Iran

Mossad's reach inside Iran exposed as Tehran arrests 28 alleged agents


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: 150 Years Ago, a Philosopher Showed Why It’s Pointless to Start Arguments on the Internet
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://getpocket.com/explore/item/ ... ernet?utm_source=pocket-newtab
Published: Feb 14, 2020
Author: Olivia Goldhill
Post Date: 2020-02-14 22:40:38 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 467
Comments: 1

Don’t feed the trolls.

Wildly inaccurate facts and spurious arguments are unavoidable features of social media. Yet no matter how infuriatingly wrong someone is, or just how much counter-evidence you have at your disposal, starting arguments on the internet rarely gets anyone to change their mind. Nearly a century-and-a-half ago, British philosopher John Stuart Mill explained, in a few clear sentences, why certain arguments simply won’t go anywhere. As historian Robert Saunders notes, Mill’s analysis neatly applies to heated and futile internet debates. Screenshot_2020-02-04 Robert Saunders on Twitter John Stuart Mill explains, in 1869, why you can never win an argument on t[...].png

Mill highlights the often overlooked reality that many opinions aren’t based on facts at all, but feelings. And so, contradictory points of information don’t shift emotionally rooted arguments, but only cause people to dig deeper into their emotions to hold onto those views.

Intuitively, most people recognize that emotions motivate opinions, and behave accordingly. We use rhetorical techniques, such as verbal flourishes and confident mannerisms, to help convince others of our views. And we know that angry reactions to, for example, evidence showing that children of same-sex parents fare just as well as those raised by heterosexual parents, are grounded in emotional prejudice rather than a deep-seated desire for the facts.

Studies reinforce these instincts about the importance of emotions. For example, patients who have brain damage in areas responsible for processing emotions also struggle to make decisions (pdf), pointing to the importance of emotions in deciding between two options. And chartered psychologist Rob Yeung, whose book How to Stand Out emphasizes the effectiveness of emotions, rather than logic, in convincing others to agree with you, points to research showing that use of metaphors motivate people to make decisions.

Online, when we can’t see others’ faces or their moods, it’s easy to lose sight of these emotional instincts. Instead of engaging with and respecting others’ feelings, there can be a tendency to bombard those with opposing views with “facts.” But even seemingly solid points of information, such as the periodic table, are often grounded in subjective perspectives; a broad philosophical theory called “social constructivism” argues that facts are always a reflection of socially constructed values. There are often multiple ways of interpreting a single point of information and so, much though some people might like to think they’re right about everything, there are surprisingly few issues to which there’s an unequivocally correct opinion.

Perhaps there’s little hope of convincing others on the internet to change their minds. But, as Saunders notes, Mill does point to another approach. Screenshot_2020-02-04 Robert Saunders on Twitter Mill also had some advice for how we should engage with arguments on the i[...].png

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Mill highlights the often overlooked reality that many opinions aren’t based on facts at all, but feelings. And so, contradictory points of information don’t shift emotionally rooted arguments, but only cause people to dig deeper into their emotions to hold onto those views.

Absolutely!

Pinguinite  posted on  2020-02-14   22:46:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]