[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

BREAKING: POLITICAL EARTHQUAKE: DOJ FIRES Maurene Comey, Federal Prosecutor Who Filed Key Court Docs to Keep Epstein Files Under Seal

Jimmy Dore: CHINA & 20 Nations To Intervene & End Israel’s Genocide!

20,000 Women. 350 Kilometers. Zero Pay. In One Week. How Did Ibrahim Traore Pull This Off?

Spain is in CHAOS! Revolution is in the air

Joe Rogan Ambushes Gavin Newsom Via Text With A COVID Question He Never Saw Coming

Batman Vs The Joker: Democrats Will Double Down On Chaos To Save Their Party

US Vows To Quit IEA If The Agency Keeps Pushing Green Transition

Tucker Carlson: People Are Frustrated That Certain Commit Crimes With Impunity

No news again, but the battle of the machines marches on...

Cash Jordan: Rioters ATTACK ICE HQ… Troops FLATTEN Uprising With ‘Zero Mercy’

Doctor Reveals What COVID Vaccines Do to the Lungs in Just One Week

Sorry paid off influencers, MAGA bot accounts, and Satan....but I'm not going to just "move on"

Marjorie Taylor Greene Bombshell Interview

Welcome To The Land Of The Free... Until You Express An Opinion

Putin ‘tells Iran to accept nuclear deal with no enrichment’

76% of Honey at Stores is Fake

"225,000 Ukrainians have now DESERTED the war" Ukraine is in a death spiral Col. Dan Davis

The New York Times Finally Stops Avoiding The G-Word

The Gaza Water Massacre: What Israel Just Confessed About Shooting Children

Powerful ERUPTION spit out volcanic mud and debris - Army Personnel ran for their lives

Another 'Conspiracy Theory' Comes True: California Bill Passes To Buy Fire-Ravaged Palisades For Low-Income Apartments

A 1,600-year-old church in the Holy Land has been torched. But not by ISIS.

More civilians have been killed while seeking aid in Gaza than were killed on 7 October.

MORE TRANS VIOLENCE

WAYNE ROOT: Here’s How Trump Turns the Epstein List Fiasco into Home Run

Maxwell Says Epstein Client List Implicates Top Democrats

Medical Record Review Of the Twins Who Died After Vaccination

New federal secrets exposed as Republican unravels Lee Harvey Oswald's hidden ties to CIA

Protest outside migrant hotel in Essex erupts into violence

Congressman Faces Eviction Over $85k Back-Rent For Luxury DC Penthouse


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: 150 Years Ago, a Philosopher Showed Why It’s Pointless to Start Arguments on the Internet
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://getpocket.com/explore/item/ ... ernet?utm_source=pocket-newtab
Published: Feb 14, 2020
Author: Olivia Goldhill
Post Date: 2020-02-14 22:40:38 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 490
Comments: 1

Don’t feed the trolls.

Wildly inaccurate facts and spurious arguments are unavoidable features of social media. Yet no matter how infuriatingly wrong someone is, or just how much counter-evidence you have at your disposal, starting arguments on the internet rarely gets anyone to change their mind. Nearly a century-and-a-half ago, British philosopher John Stuart Mill explained, in a few clear sentences, why certain arguments simply won’t go anywhere. As historian Robert Saunders notes, Mill’s analysis neatly applies to heated and futile internet debates. Screenshot_2020-02-04 Robert Saunders on Twitter John Stuart Mill explains, in 1869, why you can never win an argument on t[...].png

Mill highlights the often overlooked reality that many opinions aren’t based on facts at all, but feelings. And so, contradictory points of information don’t shift emotionally rooted arguments, but only cause people to dig deeper into their emotions to hold onto those views.

Intuitively, most people recognize that emotions motivate opinions, and behave accordingly. We use rhetorical techniques, such as verbal flourishes and confident mannerisms, to help convince others of our views. And we know that angry reactions to, for example, evidence showing that children of same-sex parents fare just as well as those raised by heterosexual parents, are grounded in emotional prejudice rather than a deep-seated desire for the facts.

Studies reinforce these instincts about the importance of emotions. For example, patients who have brain damage in areas responsible for processing emotions also struggle to make decisions (pdf), pointing to the importance of emotions in deciding between two options. And chartered psychologist Rob Yeung, whose book How to Stand Out emphasizes the effectiveness of emotions, rather than logic, in convincing others to agree with you, points to research showing that use of metaphors motivate people to make decisions.

Online, when we can’t see others’ faces or their moods, it’s easy to lose sight of these emotional instincts. Instead of engaging with and respecting others’ feelings, there can be a tendency to bombard those with opposing views with “facts.” But even seemingly solid points of information, such as the periodic table, are often grounded in subjective perspectives; a broad philosophical theory called “social constructivism” argues that facts are always a reflection of socially constructed values. There are often multiple ways of interpreting a single point of information and so, much though some people might like to think they’re right about everything, there are surprisingly few issues to which there’s an unequivocally correct opinion.

Perhaps there’s little hope of convincing others on the internet to change their minds. But, as Saunders notes, Mill does point to another approach. Screenshot_2020-02-04 Robert Saunders on Twitter Mill also had some advice for how we should engage with arguments on the i[...].png

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Mill highlights the often overlooked reality that many opinions aren’t based on facts at all, but feelings. And so, contradictory points of information don’t shift emotionally rooted arguments, but only cause people to dig deeper into their emotions to hold onto those views.

Absolutely!

Pinguinite  posted on  2020-02-14   22:46:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]