Title: NASA: "Wouldja believe the Mars-Rover snapped this super-detailed 1.8 Billion-Pixel panorama video of Martian landscape??" Source:
NASA Corp URL Source:https://mars.nasa.gov/news/8621/nas ... ghest-resolution-panorama-yet/ Published:Mar 4, 2020 Author:Stanley Kubrick's Ghost Post Date:2020-03-07 09:49:26 by Liberator Keywords:NASA, Mars, Hoax, Maxwell Smart Views:4374 Comments:24
NASA's Curiosity rover has captured its highest-resolution panorama yet of the Martian surface. Composed of more than 1,000 images taken during the 2019 Thanksgiving holiday and carefully assembled over the ensuing months, the composite contains 1.8 billion pixels of Martian landscape. The rover's Mast Camera, or Mastcam, used its telephoto lens to produce the panorama; meanwhile, it relied on its medium-angle lens to produce a lower-resolution, nearly 650-million-pixel panorama that includes the rover's deck and robotic arm.
(snip)
Curiosity Mars Rover’s 1.8 Billion-Pixel Pano (360 View): NASA’s Curiosity Mars rover produced this 360-degree panorama of "Glen Torridon," a region on the side of Mount Sharp. The panorama was taken between Nov. 24 and Dec. 1, 2019, when the mission team was out for the Thanksgiving holiday. Since the rover would be sitting still with few other tasks to do while it waited for the team to return and provide its next commands, the rover had a rare chance to image its surroundings several days in a row without moving.
Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech
(snip)
Malin Space Science Systems in San Diego built and operates Curiosity's Mastcam. JPL, a division of Caltech in Pasadena, manages the project for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington and built the Navigation Cameras and the rover.
If you're gonna lie, lie BIGLY. Watch this NASA video (accompanied by Epic Music of course)...
There are so many things impossibly wrong with this supposed "Mars" project, video, landscape, horizon -- yes, this entire theater.
Many comments at YouTube: "I can't believe we are on another planet!"
Yes, and for good reason: WE AREN'T. It's impossible for too many reasons.
Even if one assumes the Mars Rover to be real; Why are there still nothing but blurry "photos" and "video" of and on the moon? Why are there nothing but fake, different "photos" of the Earth from the Moon?
WHY is NO "Moon-Rover" camera set up on the Moon? NO detailed video shots of IT? (and no, there are no mythical "mirrors" set up on the Moon given its coincidental reflective qualities.)
And...WHY is there NO detailed video of the interior of our own unexplored Antarctica?
Yet... we-the-pods are to fully believe NASA (who is coincidentally overseeing "Climate Change" and Chemtrailing projects here on Earth) have managed not only to send a space ship to Mars, but land the craft safely, set up a Land-Rover for months/years... then start clicking super-clear video from a landscape that looks suspiciously like EARTH.
We never went to the moon. The earth is round and we can prove that mathematically by a number of differnt formulas. The math works on round earth. So don't lump me in with them in that regard.
The moon landings though? Total hoax. The Mars rovers? Likely hoax. Space....
We can achieve low earth orbit. We got a flipping space station up there we lie to the public about. I mean it's up there but we are not sending football jerseys to space for superbowl. The fuel waste would be inexcusable
Space travel is all about the cold equations. Math don't will not change for pc policies or to save a life. Once the fuel is spent that's it. And the van Allen radiation belts have an inner and outer belt and the outer belt is worst than the first.
Columbus thought he had sailed to the far east but had in fact landed in what was to become the New World. Spain laid claim to Florida originally and much of the other lands in Central and South America. Many Spanish Galions went to the bottom during those storms when loaded with gold dubloons.
In California the Span ish Missions brought Christianity to the west coast of North America. ;)
Q: If the earth is "round", which "formulas" and "math" are to be cited as proof? (just asking)
The old formula for line of sight distance is off. That formula is a few centuries old. The earth has expanded a bit since then. The numbers need to be adjusted for natural earth expansion.
As for outer space and what not, yes I believe that's real. Do I think we have done better than low earth orbit? I'll need to see the lead lined space vehicle first.