[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork

Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More

The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome

Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files

Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7, 2023

100m Americans live in areas with cancer-causing 'forever chemicals' in their water


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Trump suggests he may veto surveillance bill
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://thehill.com/homenews/admini ... -he-may-veto-surveillance-bill
Published: Mar 13, 2020
Author: Morgan Chalfant
Post Date: 2020-03-13 08:24:08 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 478
Comments: 9

President Trump on Thursday said that “many” Republican senators want him to veto legislation reauthorizing expiring intelligence programs, an indication the president is considering doing so.

“Many Republican Senators want me to Veto the FISA Bill until we find out what led to, and happened with, the illegal attempted ‘coup’ of the duly elected President of the United States, and others!” Trump tweeted Thursday morning, referring to the FBI’s investigation into Russian interference and contacts between his campaign and Moscow, which has not been deemed illegal.

Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), both of whom are allies of the president, have been pressing Trump to veto the House legislation reauthorizing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), arguing it does not contain significant enough reforms.

The House version, which is backed by Attorney General William Barr, reauthorizes expiring intelligence programs and also includes broader changes to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The measure was passed by the House with bipartisan support on Wednesday in a 278-136 vote, setting up a vote in the Senate as soon as Thursday.

Congress has until the end of Sunday to reauthorize three expiring provisions of the USA Freedom Act.

A number of the president’s House allies voted in favor of the legislation Wednesday.

Asked Wednesday whether Trump was considering vetoing the bill, a White House official told The Hill that the president is interested in significant FISA reforms but is “carefully listening” to views of all Republicans.

“There is a lot of interest in the significant reform that conservatives drove to completion to address the abuses of FISA against him and other innocent members of the 2016 campaign,” the official said.

Trump has long charged that the FBI’s 2016 investigation of his campaign was an attempted coup orchestrated by agents biased against his presidential campaign.

A recent Justice Department inspector report found no evidence that officials were motivated by political bias in opening investigations into four Trump campaign associates.

At the same time, the inspector general sharply criticized the FBI’s handling of a surveillance warrant application to wiretap his onetime campaign adviser Carter Page; one Justice Department official has reportedly been referred for criminal investigation as a result of his actions.

No charges have been brought against officials for their actions in the probe, but the FISA court has barred officials under review for their actions in the Page wiretaps.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

#1. To: Ada (#0) (Edited)

Look into this easy-peazy constitutional side-stepping horse shit and know in your heart that "it's a big club, and we ain't in it" !

The road to hell is paved with good intentions !

noone222  posted on  2020-03-13   9:03:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: noone222 (#1)

Look into this easy-peazy constitutional side-stepping horse shit and know in your heart that "it's a big club, and we ain't in it"

Can't see the video, but agree with your assessment.

https://www.activistpost.com/2020/03/the-earn-it-bill-is-the- governments-plan-to-scan-every-message-online.html

no one will be able to buy or sell without worshipping the beast is the plan

by the way, I think we both know the constitution died a long time ago. now this national emergency upon national emergency will soon expose it for all to see.

"... “During times of war or national ‘emergency’ Americans have no rights; instead, the United States government becomes custodian of our rights. Under an emergency government, all rights to due process of law (long process) are suspended, leaving no bar against governmental violations of our rights. The people become mere objects (In Rem) with no unalienable rights to be protected.

“Once the government gains ‘emergency’ power, it is reluctant to relinquish that power. During the Wars of 1812, 1847, 1861, 1917 and 1941, the ‘emergency war powers’ were gradually and insidiously defined. However, on March 9, 1933, our government declared a National Emergency and, based on the public’s ignorance and the complacency, took permanent control of the people.

Since March 9, 1933, the United States has remained in a continuous state of declared National Emergency. Since that time, the American people have lost their rights to government, and these rights have not been restored. The American government now claims the power of right, and rules the people by Statute – not the Constitution – in all cases. Under emergency powers, government can do whatever it deems ‘necessary’. The courts change from protectors of the people’s unalienable Rights to enforcers of the government’s statutes...."

http://themillenniumreport.com/2018/03/has-the-u-s-constitution-been- suspended-since-fdr-declared-the-state-of-emergency-in-march-of-1933/

Rule by Executive Order

http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2019/01/05/fema-camps-executive-orders- national-security-act-of-1947/

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2020-03-13   12:12:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#3)

You and I share the same hymnal !

noone222  posted on  2020-03-13   13:42:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 4.

#5. To: noone222 (#4)

lol! we'll have a lot of things to talk about one day...into eternity. SO glad and I look forward to it. take care and God bless!

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2020-03-13 13:52:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]