[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Whitney Webb: Foreign Intelligence Affiliated CTI League Poses Major National Security Risk

Paul Joseph Watson: What Fresh Hell Is This?

Watch: 50 Kids Loot 7-Eleven In Beverly Hills For Candy & Snacks

"No Americans": Insider Of Alleged Trafficking Network Reveals How Migrants Ended Up At Charleroi, PA Factory

Ford scraps its SUV electric vehicle; the US consumer decides what should be produced, not the Government

The Doctor is In the House [Two and a half hours early?]

Trump Walks Into Gun Store & The Owner Says This... His Reaction Gets Everyone Talking!

Here’s How Explosive—and Short-Lived—Silver Spikes Have Been

This Popeyes Fired All the Blacks And Hired ALL Latinos

‘He’s setting us up’: Jewish leaders express alarm at Trump’s blaming Jews if he loses

Asia Not Nearly Gay Enough Yet, CNN Laments

Undecided Black Voters In Georgia Deliver Brutal Responses on Harris (VIDEO)

Biden-Harris Admin Sued For Records On Trans Surgeries On Minors

Rasmussen Poll Numbers: Kamala's 'Bounce' Didn't Faze Trump

Trump BREAKS Internet With Hysterical Ad TORCHING Kamala | 'She is For They/Them!'

45 Funny Cybertruck Memes So Good, Even Elon Might Crack A Smile

Possible Trump Rally Attack - Serious Injuries Reported

BULLETIN: ISRAEL IS ENTERING **** UKRAINE **** WAR ! Missile Defenses in Kiev !

ATF TO USE 2ND TRUMP ATTACK TO JUSTIFY NEW GUN CONTROL...

An EMP Attack on the U.S. Power Grids and Critical National Infrastructure

New York Residents Beg Trump to Come Back, Solve Out-of-Control Illegal Immigration

Chicago Teachers Confess They Were told to Give Illegals Passing Grades

Am I Racist? Reviewed by a BLACK MAN

Ukraine and Israel Following the Same Playbook, But Uncle Sam Doesn't Want to Play

"The Diddy indictment is PROTECTING the highest people in power" Ian Carroll

The White House just held its first cabinet meeting in almost a year. Guess who was running it.

The Democrats' War On America, Part One: What "Saving Our Democracy" Really Means

New York's MTA Proposes $65.4 Billion In Upgrades With Cash It Doesn't Have

More than 100 killed or missing as Sinaloa Cartel war rages in Mexico

New York state reports 1st human case of EEE in nearly a decade


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Senate Bill Puts Citizenship Up for Sale For The Modest Price Of $2,000
Source: Human Events
URL Source: http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=13835
Published: Apr 6, 2006
Author: Stephen Manfredi
Post Date: 2006-04-06 19:32:11 by Brian S
Keywords: None
Views: 24
Comments: 3

Posted Apr 06, 2006

The Senate is currently considering legislation that would, among other things, sell citizenship to illegal immigrants for the modest price of $2,000. All Americans should take offense.

The immigration reform bill in question amounts to a massive blanket amnesty which would allow the 12 million illegal aliens currently in the United States to seek citizenship without even returning to their home country. Cautious to avoid the stigma of "amnesty," however, the bill’s defenders have erected an assortment of weak obstacles to absolutely unfettered citizenship. This is simply window dressing.

Sen. Teddy Kennedy (D.-Mass.), the architect of the bill's guest worker program, argues that "this is not amnesty" because illegal aliens would pay two $1,000 fines over a six year period, pay taxes, submit to a background check, and learn English before attaining "earned legalization." All of this verbiage amounts to obfuscation.

As Sen. Chuck Grassley (R.-Iowa) recently said, "If it looks, acts and smells like amnesty, then it is amnesty." He's right, but the snake oil salesmen peddling this bill are unable to speak as plainly.

Like the amnesty of 1986 which pardoned 3 million illegal immigrants, and the amnesty of the mid-1990s which legalized millions more, what historians will one day call the "Amnesty Act of 2006" promises to sanction, reward, and encourage more illegal behavior. Albert Einstein defined insanity as doing the same action over and over and expecting a different result. His words are applicable.

Ultimately, this debate is not just about access to cheap labor. It is about the security of America's borders, our right to national sovereignty, and our national security in a post-9/11 world. Nearly five years after the terrorist attacks, our borders remain woefully insecure. And while our Mexican neighbors seeking work in America pose no national security or terrorist threat, our porous southern border has become our nation's soft underbelly. An open border cannot distinguish between a migrant seeking opportunity and a terrorist intent on doing us harm. We cannot afford this perpetual state of lawlessness.

Our government's first obligation is to protect and defend the American people and their Constitution. Yet our laws are flouted with contempt and our borders are mocked as irrelevant. The Senate's response? Continue to reside in the country you entered illegally, pay some fines, and maybe learn some English before becoming an American citizen. Those who have waited in line to legally become citizens should continue to wait. This is unfair. America has always been and should remain a beacon for legal immigrants.

Significant upgrades in border patrol manpower and infrastructure are conspicuously absent from the Senate bill. So is a more rigid internal enforcement mechanism to stop employers from hiring illegals. The Senate should first resolve how to secure and acquire operational control over our borders before venturing into the complexities of immigration reform. Seeking immigration reform without border security is a fruitless endeavor -- like trying to build a house before completing the foundation. We cannot create a framework for more legal immigration until our laws and territorial integrity are first respected. The current bill is all carrot and no stick.

And the American people are justifiably upset. If this Senate immigration bill becomes law, the political consequences for Republicans will be almost as devastating as the policy implications would be for America. Fifty-six percent of Americans oppose granting temporary worker status to illegal immigrants. And 62 percent oppose easing the path to citizenship. Facing a tough election cycle this year, Republicans are not helping themselves by supporting a wildly unpopular and Democratic-crafted amnesty bill that is rejected by a majority of Americans and a supermajority of Republicans.

Republicans are frittering away what could be their last opportunity to show leadership on a crucial national issue before November. They have been completely outmaneuvered. Instead of uniting the country around border security and splitting the Democratic coalition, Republicans have succeeded in dividing their own party and will soon unite the nation against their unpopular amnesty bill.

It didn't have to be this way. Senate Republicans and the administration could have worked to build consensus on the divisive immigration reform issue, rallied the GOP base with tougher border security legislation based more closely on the House bill, and driven a wedge between Big Labor and Democrats. Hypersensitivity, or insensitivity, to Hispanic opinion fueled this political miscalculation. It is factually wrong, and insulting, to think that Hispanics support illegal behavior and would punish Republicans at the polls for taking a hard line on border enforcement.

There is still a broad national consensus which supports tougher border security policies and opposes easing the path to citizenship for illegals. Republicans would be wise to tackle one problem at a time by focusing on border enforcement first, and the important question of immigration reform second. Both are essential to maintaining an open society based on the rule of law and legal immigration. That's not just sensible policy, but great politics.

Mr. Manfredi is a Republican strategist and account executive with Shirley & Banister Public Affairs. He has worked with clients on the immigration issue.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Brian S (#0)

Human Events should know better than to repeat that BS figure of 11 - 12 million illegals running loose in this country. That drives me crazier than people referring to this country as a 'democracy'.

who knows what evil  posted on  2006-04-06   19:51:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: who knows what evil (#1)

uman Events should know better than to repeat that BS figure of 11 - 12 million illegals running loose in this country

My sources indicate twenty five to thirty MM.

tom007  posted on  2006-04-07   0:03:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: who knows what evil (#1)

figure of 11 - 12 million illegals running loose in this country

That is the figure the MSM has adopted...so what the hell can you do.

It seems the 11-12m is enough to piss the populace off, just wait until the minions are in competition with the other 25-30 in putting a roof over their heads and food on the table.

The NWO, dream of Daddy Bush is being realized.

It is like rape...if it is inevitable, just lay back, fantazise and enjoy it!

Brian S  posted on  2006-04-07   0:12:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]