[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Cash Jordan: “We’re Coming In"... Migrant Mob ENTERS ICE HQ, Get ERASED By 'Deportation Unit'

Opioids More Likely To Kill Than Car Crashes Or Suicide

The association between COVID-19 “vaccines” and cognitive decline

Democrats Sink to Near Zero in New Gallup Poll, Theyre Just Not Satisfied

She Couldn't Read Her Own Diploma: Why Public Schools Pass Students but Fail Society

Peter Schiff: Gold To $6,000 Next Year, Dollar Index To 70

Russia Just Admitted Exactly What Everyone – But Trump – Already Knew About Putin's Ukraine Plans

Sex Offenses in London by Nationality

Greater Israel Collapses: Iran the Next Target

Before Jeffrey Epstein: The FINDERS

Cyprus: The Israeli Flood Has Become A Deluge

Israel Actually Slaughtered Their Own People On Oct 7th Says Israeli Newspaper w/ Max Blumenthal

UK Council Offers Emotional Support To Staff "Discomforted" By Seeing The National Flag

Inside the Underground City Where 700 Trucks Come and Go Every Day

Fentanyl Involved In 70% Of US Drug Overdose Deaths

Iran's New Missiles. Short Version

Obama Can't Bear This. Kash Patel Exposes Dead Chef Revelation. Obama’s Legacy DESTROYED!

Triple-Digit Silver Imminent? Critical Mineral, Backwardation & Remonetization | Mike Maloney

Israel Sees Sykes-Picot Borders As 'Meaningless' & 'Will Go Where They Want': Trump Envoy

Bring Back Asylums: It's Time To Talk About Transgender Fatigue In America

German Political Parties (Ex-AfD) Sign 'Fairness Pact' That Prevents Criticizing Immigration

CARVING .45 CALIBER AUTOMATICS OUT OF STEEL WWII UNION SWITCH AND SIGNAL MOVIE

This surprising diabetes link could protect your brain

Putin and Xi to lay foundations for a new world order in Beijing

Cancer Natural Solutions Q&R

Is ANYONE buying this anymore? (Netanyahu)

Mt Etna in Sicily Eupting

These Soviet 4x4 Sedans Are Cooler Than You Think!

SSRIs and School Shootings, FDA Corruption, and Why Everyone on Anti-Depressants Is Totally Unhappy

St. Louis Man Who Gunned Down Police Officer Demond Taylor Is Released on $5,000 Bond


Science/Tech
See other Science/Tech Articles

Title: You’re a Completely Different Person at 14 and 77, the Longest-Running Personality Study Ever Has Found
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://getpocket.com/explore/item/ ... r-has?utm_source=pocket-newtab
Published: Apr 18, 2020
Author: Olivia Goldhill
Post Date: 2020-04-18 07:21:23 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 3091
Comments: 11

As we age, we change beyond recognition.

Look at a photo of yourself as a teenager and, mistaken fashion choices aside, it’s likely you see traces of the same person with the same personality quirks as you are today. But whether or not you truly are the same person over a lifetime—and what that notion of personhood even means—is the subject of ongoing philosophical and psychology debate.

The longest personality study of all time, published in 2016 in Psychology and Aging and highlighted by the British Psychological Society, suggests that over the course of a lifetime, just as your physical appearance changes and your cells are constantly replaced, your personality is also transformed beyond recognition.

The study begins with data from a 1950 survey of 1,208 14-year-olds in Scotland. Teachers were asked to use six questionnaires to rate the teenagers on six personality traits: self-confidence, perseverance, stability of moods, conscientiousness, originality, and desire to learn. Together, the results from these questionnaires were amalgamated into a rating for one trait, which was defined as “dependability.” More than six decades later, researchers tracked down 635 of the participants, and 174 agreed to repeat testing.

This time, aged 77 years old, the participants rated themselves on the six personality traits, and also nominated a close friend or relative to do the same. Overall, there was not much overlap from the questionnaires taken 63 years earlier. “Correlations suggested no significant stability of any of the 6 characteristics or their underlying factor, dependability, over the 63-year interval,” wrote the researchers. “We hypothesized that we would find evidence of personality stability over an even longer period of 63 years, but our correlations did not support this hypothesis,” they later added.

The findings were a surprise to researchers because previous personality studies, over shorter periods of time, seemed to show consistency. Studies over several decades, focusing on participants from childhood to middle age, or from middle age to older age, showed stable personality traits. But the most recent study, covering the longest period, suggests that personality stability is disrupted over time. “The longer the interval between two assessments of personality, the weaker the relationship between the two tends to be,” the researchers write. “Our results suggest that, when the interval is increased to as much as 63 years, there is hardly any relationship at all.”

Perhaps those who had impulsive character flaws as a teenager would be grateful that certain personality traits might even out later in life. But it’s disconcerting to think that your entire personality is transformed.

“Personality refers to an individual’s characteristic patterns of thought, emotion, and behavior, together with the psychological mechanisms—hidden or not—behind those patterns,” note the authors, quoting psychology professor David Funder’s definition.

If your patterns of thought, emotions, and behavior so drastically alter over the decades, can you truly be considered the same person in old age as you were as a teenager? This question ties in with broader theories about the nature of the self. For example, there is growing neuroscience research that supports the ancient Buddhist belief that our notion of a stable “self” is nothing more than an illusion.

Perhaps this won’t surprise you if you’ve had the experience of running into a very old friend from school, and found a completely different person from the child you remembered. This research suggests that, as the decades go by, your own younger self could be similarly unrecognizable.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0) (Edited)

14 is about the worst possible age for setting the benchmark, and going through WWII prolly was not the ideal situation for kids.

Changes are called growing-up and maturation.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2020-04-18   7:33:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ada (#0)

As we age, we change beyond recognition.

For sure we need a survey of 1,208 14-year-olds in Scotland to tell us this.

They've told everything but how much dough was ponied up for this "study."

randge  posted on  2020-04-18   9:36:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Lod (#1)

14 is about the worst possible age for setting the benchmark

I agree. I believe that at age 70 we are the same person we were at age 20, just more so.

Ada  posted on  2020-04-18   12:55:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Lod (#1)

going through WWII prolly was not the ideal situation for kids.

Not many 77 year olds went through a war that ended 75 years ago.

When I see something like this, the first thing I want to see is the survey questions to see how valid the "study" was. I have longs since been wary of GIGO results.


Freedom is a social skill.

Anthem  posted on  2020-04-18   14:11:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Ada (#3)

at age 70 we are the same person we were at age 20, just more so.

and a lot less so. I'll keep the personality, just give me back the body.


Freedom is a social skill.

Anthem  posted on  2020-04-18   14:13:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Ada (#0)

With age, most people obtain wisdom regarding their actions. They are less impulsive,therefor being more dependable.

johnj  posted on  2020-04-18   14:47:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: johnj (#6)

Wisdom perhaps. But not necessarily a better person. If you were nasty at age 20, you will still be nasty at age 70. Conversely, if you were good natured at age 20, you will be even more good natured at age 70.

Ada  posted on  2020-04-18   16:18:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Anthem (#4)

The study begins with data from a 1950 survey of 1,208 14-year-olds...

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2020-04-18   16:56:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Ada (#7)

But not necessarily a better person. If you were nasty at age 20, you will still be nasty at age 70. Conversely, if you were good natured at age 20, you will be even more good natured at age 70.

The good or the evil just keeps growing with age.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2020-04-18   16:59:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Lod (#8)

The study begins with data from a 1950 survey of 1,208 14-year-olds...

Tricky! Putting that in a paragraph I skipped. Besides, who believes they got 12 hundred boys from Scotland to answer a bunch of questions. More likely the surveyors got beaned with rocks and fled, filling out the forms themselves when they got back empty handed.


Freedom is a social skill.

Anthem  posted on  2020-04-18   17:22:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Anthem (#10)

this lends credence to your suspicions

...researchers tracked down 635 of the participants, and 174 agreed to repeat testing.

“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken

Lod  posted on  2020-04-18   19:51:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]