[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Israel/Zionism See other Israel/Zionism Articles Title: With Apparently Fabricated Nuclear Documents, Netanyahu Pushed the US Towards War With Iran An investigation of supposed Iranian nuclear documents presented in a dramatically staged Netanyahu press conference indicates they were an Israeli fabrication designed to trigger US military conflict with Iran. President Donald Trump scrapped the nuclear deal with Iran and continued to risk war with Iran based on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus claim to have proven definitively that Iran was determined to manufacture nuclear weapons. Netanyahu not only spun Trump but much of the corporate media as well, duping them with the public unveiling of what he claimed was the entire secret Iranian nuclear archive. In early April 2018, Netanyahu briefed Trump privately on the supposed Iranian nuclear archive and secured his promise to leave the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). That April 30, Netanyahu took the briefing to the public in a characteristically dramatic live performance in which he claimed Israels Mossad intelligence services had stolen Irans entire nuclear archive from Tehran. You may well know that Irans leaders repeatedly deny ever pursuing nuclear weapons
Netanyahu declared. Well, tonight, Im here to tell you one thing: Iran lied. Big time. However, an investigation of the supposed Iranian nuclear documents by The Grayzone reveals them to be the product of an Israeli disinformation operation that helped trigger the most serious threat of war since the conflict with Iran began nearly four decades ago. This investigation found multiple indications that the story of Mossads heist of 50,000 pages of secret nuclear files from Tehran was very likely an elaborate fiction and that the documents were fabricated by the Mossad itself. According to the official Israeli version of events, the Iranians had gathered the nuclear documents from various locations and moved them to what Netanyahu himself described as a dilapidated warehouse in southern Tehran. Even assuming that Iran had secret documents demonstrating the development of nuclear weapons, the claim that top secret documents would be held in a nondescript and unguarded warehouse in Central Tehran is so unlikely that it should have raised immediate alarm bells about the storys legitimacy. Even more problematic was the claim by a Mossad official to Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman that Mossad knew not only in what warehouse its commandos would find the documents but precisely which safes to break into with a blowtorch. The official told Bergman the Mossad team had been guided by an intelligence asset to the few safes in the warehouse contained the binders with the most important documents. Netanyahu bragged publicly that very few Iranians knew the location of the archive; the Mossad official told Bergman only a handful of people knew. But two former senior CIA official, both of whom had served as the agencys top Middle East analyst, dismissed Netanyahus claims as lacking credibility in responses to a query from The Grayzone. According to Paul Pillar, who was National Intelligence Officer for the region from 2001 to 2005, Any source on the inside of the Iranian national security apparatus would be extremely valuable in Israeli eyes, and Israeli deliberations about the handling of that sources information presumably would be biased in favor long-term protection of the source. The Israeli story of how its spies located the documents does seem fishy, Pillar said, especially considering Israels obvious effort to derive maximum political-diplomatic mileage out of the supposed revelation of such a well-placed source. Graham Fuller, a 27-year veteran of the CIA who served as National Intelligence Officer for the Near East and South Asia as well as Vice-Chairman of the National Intelligence Council, offered a similar assessment of the Israeli claim. If the Israelis had such a sensitive source in Tehran, Fuller commented, they would not want to risk him. Fuller concluded that the Israelis claim that they had accurate knowledge of which safes to crack is dubious, and the whole thing may be somewhat fabricated. No proof of authenticity Netanyahus April 30 slide show presented a series of purported Iranian documents containing sensational revelations that he pointed to as proof of his insistence that Iran had lied about its interest in manufacturing nuclear weapons. The visual aides included a file supposedly dating back to early 2000 or before that detailed various ways to achieve a plan to build five nuclear weapons by mid-2003. Another document that generated widespread media interest was an alleged report on a discussion among leading Iranian scientists of a purported mid-2003 decision by Irans Defense Minister to separate an existing secret nuclear weapons program into overt and covert parts. Left out of the media coverage of these nuclear archive documents was a simple fact that was highly inconvenient to Netanyahu: nothing about them offered a scintilla of evidence that they were genuine. For example, not one contained the official markings of the relevant Iranian agency. Tariq Rauf, who was head of the Verification and Security Policy Coordination Office at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) from 2001 to 2011, told The Grayzone that these markings were practically ubiquitous on official Iranian files. Iran is a highly bureaucratized system, Rauf explained. Hence, one would expect a proper bookkeeping system that would record incoming correspondence, with date received, action officer, department, circulation to additional relevant officials, proper letterhead, etc. But as Rauf noted, the nuclear archive documents that were published by the Washington Post bore no such evidence of Iranian government origin. Nor did they contain other markings to indicate their creation under the auspices of an Iranian government agency. What those documents do have in common is the mark of a rubber stamp for a filing system showing numbers for a record, a file and a ledger binder like the black binders that Netanyahu flashed to the cameras during his slideshow. But these could have easily been created by the Mossad and stamped on to the documents along with the appropriate Persian numbers. Forensic confirmation of the documents authenticity would have required access to the original documents. But as Netanyahu noted in his April 30, 2018 slide show, the original Iranian materials were kept in a very safe place implying that no one would be allowed to have any such access. Withholding access to outside experts In fact, even the most pro-Israeli visitors to Tel Aviv have been denied access to the original documents. David Albright of the Institute for Science and International Security and Olli Heinonen of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies both stalwart defenders of the official Israeli line on Iranian nuclear policy reported in October 2018 that they had been given only a slide deck showing reproductions or excerpts of the documents. When a team of six specialists from Harvard Kennedy Schools Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs visited Israel in January 2019 for briefings on the archive, they too were offered only a cursory browse of the supposedly original documents. Harvard Professor Matthew Bunn recalled in an interview with this writer that the team had been shown one of the binders containing what were said to be original documents relating to Irans relations with the IAEA and had paged through a bit of it. But they were shown no documents on Iran nuclear weapons work. As Bunn admitted, We werent attempting to do any forensic analysis of these documents. Typically, it would be the job of the US government and the IAEA to authenticate the documents. Oddly, the Belfer Center delegation reported that the US government and the IAEA had each received only copies of the entire archive, not the original files. And the Israelis were in no hurry to provide the genuine articles: the IAEA did not receive a complete set of documents until November 2019, according to Bunn. By then, Netanyahu had not only already accomplished the demolition of the Iran nuclear deal; he and Trumps ferociously hawkish CIA-director Mike Pompeo had maneuvered the president into a policy of imminent confrontation with Tehran. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|