[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
World News See other World News Articles Title: Why Michael Flynn Was Set Up The more we learn about the evils done to Michael Flynn, and they increase day by day, the more the FBI comes to resemble the KGB. Or is it the earlier version, the NKVD, whose leader Lavrentiy Beria famously declared Show me the man and Ill find you the crime. James Comey - the head of the FBI during this period of extraordinary moral turpitude - never said anything anywhere near that pithy or memorable but he did Beria one better. He, with Peter Strzok, whose feckless emails to his paramour continue to amaze, and various other bit players - some revealed others yet to be revealed - of this sorry saga, didnt just find a crime, they invented one. In all fairness, the Soviets, pre and post-Beria, often did the same, putting the darkness in Darkness at Noon with forced confessions as in the Metro-Vickers Affair (1933) when innocent Brits took the hit for the failure of Stalins Five-Year Plan. What was really going on with what was essentially the forced confession of Michael Flynn? Attorney Andrew C. McCarthy said on Tucker Carlson Thursday night that Flynn wasnt the target. It was Trump. Flynn was just a seasoned intelligence professional (McCarthys words) who had to be implicated and put out of the way in order to reach the president, the real bulls eye. Thats likely true, but its also likely that wasnt the only reason. Flynn was by himself a target. During the transition, it is said Obama gave Trump two pieces of advice on whom he considered to be the current greatest threats to the United States, so the new president could be forearmedKim Jong-un and Michael Flynn. Michael Flynn? (Id add several exclamation points and question marks, but its tacky.). Why would he be of anywhere near that importance to be put in the same conversation as the nuclear-armed dictator of North Korea? The answer, I believe, is a four letter word: Iran. The Iran Deal (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA) was, with the Affordable Care Act, one of the twin pillars of Obamas presidency on which he wanted to base his legacy. Im not going into here the many theories of why, beyond that legacy, Obama was so attached to the JCPOA, but, by the time Trump was elected, it was already under heavy criticism due to the Islamic Republics violent activities in the Syrian civil war and elsewhere, arming Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis and other proxies with moneys that came via America andnaive as it now soundswere supposed to be for the improvement of the lives of the Iranian people. Flynn was known to have been one of the most adamant opponents of the Iran Deal within the Obama administration in the first place and, with his military record as a three-star general plus aforementioned intelligence expertise, perhaps the most powerful one. So bringing down Flynn was a two-for, striking a blow at the new president while hopefully helping to preserve the Iran Deal. The second part didnt work, but the first did
for a while. Its therefore not totally surprisingwhat is these days?that the newly-revealed documents have SCO (Special Counsels Office) scrawled on them, among other incriminating notes indicating a setup was in the cards for Flynn. That means these statements exculpating Trumps newly-appointed National Security Adviser went to Muellers office where someone (Mueller? Weissman?) ignored them and continued with what Trump has colloquially, and I think too loosely, branded a hoax. It was far more than that. It was a form of defenestration. When we look for the Mr. Big in all this, as we are tempted to do aswe can be more confident now more rolls out, we should not settle for James Comey, as culpable as he may be. This bizarre character who self-identified on Twitter as the theologian Reinhold Niebuhr is not the end to the story. We are looking at a Netflix series with a plot that gets increasingly complicated. It goes past Comey and into the intelligence agencies and the State Departmenta real life version of Scandal with, I regret to tell show runner Shonda Rhymes, the liberals and progressives almost always the villains. When it reaches Brennan and Obama, it may not even end there. Maybe even John Durham doesnt know. (Kidding. I hope.) Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|