[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
World News See other World News Articles Title: What is China covering up about the coronavirus?: Devine What is China covering up about the coronavirus?: Devine By Miranda Devine May 6, 2020 | 10:14 Workers near a cage of mice at the P4 lab in Wuhan, China.JOHANNES EISELE/AFP via Getty Images Days before the Wuhan wet market was bleached, whistleblowers were punished and virus samples were destroyed, someone at the high- security Wuhan Institute of Virology censored its virus database in an apparent attempt to disassociate the laboratory from a novel- coronavirus outbreak that would become a global pandemic. This is what open-source intelligence uncovered in the United Kingdom reveals. Substantial alterations to the WIV database on the evening of Dec. 30, the day before the World Health Organization was alerted to the outbreak of a cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, are just another indication that the Chinese Communist Party is hiding something when it comes to the origins of COVID-19. The question of whether the virus came from the Wuhan wet market, as China insists, or leaked from the nearby WIV laboratory, where high- risk research into animal-to-human transmission of bat coronaviruses was being conducted, is at the center of allegations of a coverup and a worldwide clamor for an independent investigation into the source of the disease. Shi Zhengli, the virologist known as China’s “batwoman” for her work with bat coronaviruses, directs the WIV’s Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases and is listed as the primary database contact. On Dec. 30, she was in Shanghai for a conference when she was summoned back to Wuhan with the news that a novel coronavirus had been detected in two pneumonia patients. On the overnight train from Shanghai, according to a March article in Scientific American, she was stricken with worry about the coronaviruses. “Could they have come from our lab?” she wondered. China’s ‘Batwoman' still studies animal-borne coronavirus amid claims lab was in on cover-up After all, the closest known relative of this new coronavirus, a bat virus named RaTG13, was in her lab. Weeks later, she would post a message on WeChat saying, “I swear with my life, [the virus] has nothing to do with the lab.” But at some point while she was on that train ride to Wuhan, alterations were made to her database, which contained records of bat viruses transmitted to other wild animals. Most of the changes were to delete the keywords “wildlife” or “wild animals.” This is significant, because global health researchers say the virus jumped from bats to humans via another wild animal — the crucial “missing link” in the COVID-19 transmission chain. Shi used to boast that her bat-virus database was unique because it included data on virus variants in other wild animals. Was her database censored to keep prying eyes away from references to cross-species transmission of viruses in wild animals? For instance, the title of the database was changed that night from “Wildlife-borne viral pathogen database” to “Bat and rodent-borne viral pathogen database.” “Wild animal” was replaced with “bat and rodent” or “bat and rat” at least 10 times in the database. Also, a reference to “arthropod vectors” was removed. Keywords that might facilitate searches potentially connecting the database with the outbreak also were deleted. “Wild animal samples,” “viral pathogen data,” “emerging infectious diseases” and “cross- species infection” were keywords associated with the original version. On Dec. 30 they were replaced with “bat,” “rodent” and “virus.” “It looks like a rushed, inconsistent effort to disassociate the project from the outbreak by rebranding it,” says the British open- source intelligence analyst who found the alterations. “It’s a strange thing to do within hours of being informed of a novel-coronavirus outbreak.” He surmises: “If the WIV had found the missing link between bat virus RaTG13 and SARS-CoV-2 [the coronavirus that causes COVID-19] from an animal vector, it would have been in Shi’s database.” Ambassador's Orwellian op-ed asks US to stop blaming China for COVID-19 There’s no conclusive evidence that any of the changes were made for sinister reasons. But China’s lies and furtive actions since the outbreak lead us to believe the worst. “This is an enormous crisis created by the fact that the Chinese Communist Party reverted to form, reverted to the kinds of disinformation, the kinds of concealment, that authoritarian regimes do,” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in an interview Sunday with ABC News. “There is enormous evidence that [the Wuhan lab] is where this began . . . “These are not the first times that we’ve had a world exposed to viruses as a result of failures in a Chinese lab.” On Wednesday, Pompeo walked back his comments slightly at a press conference. “We don’t have certainty,” he said. “We’re all trying to get to clarity.” China’s refusal to allow an investigation of the origins of the Wuhan virus, or even to share original virus samples, impedes the search for treatments and a vaccine. As if that weren’t bad enough, now it is threatening economic boycotts against countries like Australia that want an investigation. “The CCP organizational and governmental culture is to cover up and ruthlessly control,” says a retired senior Australian intelligence officer who served in China. “The arrest of frontline health professionals in January was standard practice.” We don’t know why the changes were made to the WIV database. What we do know is they were made the same day a young ophthal mologist, Dr. Li Wenliang, warned colleagues in an online chat group about a “SARS-like coronavirus” among patients in the emergency department of a Wuhan Hospital. Li was arrested two days later, along with seven other doctors, for “spreading rumors” and forced to recant. He died a month later, of the coronavirus, at age 33. Kid’s got an eloon for a Dad You have to feel sorry for the newborn son of Elon Musk and his girlfriend, singer Grimes. For starters, his parents aren’t married, they conduct their lives on Twitter, and his dad has vowed to sell off almost all their worldly possessions. Because they’re so special, they named the boy X Æ A-12 and then disagreed online about the meaning of the moniker. Worse, they posted a photo of the child with his face covered in virtual tattoos and a set of upside-down fake eyelashes. He’ll get his revenge in 18 years by renaming himself Brent, moving to Staten Island and voting for Barron Trump. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||