See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Conservative-Led Supreme Court Votes 6-3 to Grant Gays and Transsexuals Special Rights and Privileges
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.unz.com/estriker/conser ... special-rights-and-privileges/
Published: Jun 16, 2020
Author: Eric Striker
Post Date: 2020-06-16 07:59:44 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 1598
Comments: 12
Judge Neil Gorsuch dealt another blow to the credibility of the Republican Party today. Trump-sponsoredGorsuch joined George W. Bush appointee John Roberts and three activist judges in a 6-3 ruling declaring that homosexuals and transsexuals are entitled to special and exclusive work place protections under the 1964 Civil Rights act. Gorsuch, who claims to be a Constitutional “originalist,” declared that the provision in the Civil Rights act barring employment discrimination based on “sex” could be textually interpreted as meaning gay sex, as well as male fetishists who use drugs and surgeries to imitate women. The Civil Rights act, which racially excludes granting equal rights to white non-Jewish people, itself violates multiple enshrined liberties in the original US Constitution. In practice, the decision made by Gorsuch, et al, will protect all kinds of highly inappropriate work place behavior and corruption. Firing an individual who publicly declares unusual or deviant sexual behavior without dealing with lawsuits and state investigations will now be nearly impossible. The ruling was on a combination of cases: Bostock v. Clayton County, Altitude Express v. Zarda, and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In Bostock v. Clayton County, a gay man named Gerald Bostock was fired from his job as an official at the Clayton County Juvenile Court for misusing funds. According to local reporting, Bostock was trusted with public money set aside to train volunteers to help foster children. Bostock went on to spend the money on food and liquor for his LGBT-only softball team at Atlanta gay bars “Cowtippers” and “F.R.O.G.S.” In the eyes of SCOTUS, Bostock and his gay friends, who drank and ate away money meant for orphans, were the real victims in the scandal. In Altitude Express v. Zarda, a man named Donald Zarda was fired in 2010 from his Long Island skydiving company after his employer found he had inappropriately touched a customer. The allegation was made by a female client and her male acquaintance. An internal investigation by Altitude Express found it to be credible. Zarda’s defense was that it was impossible for him to have allegedly sexually harassed the victim because he claims to be gay. Though Zarda passed away in 2014, his estate continued his lawsuit, which stated in drawn out legal battles that he was actually a victim of anti-gay discrimination. The Supreme Court agrees. The ruling on R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes is the most extreme of all. The religious liberty organization, the Alliance Defending Freedom, took up the case of Tom Rost, who fired a transsexual employee named Aimee Stephens in 2013 due to Rost’s Christian beliefs. The ADF responded to Gorsuch, et al’s absurd ruling by outlining the implications: Christians will be forced to accommodate transsexuals even if it violates their conscience, co-workers will be compelled by federal law to use “preferred” pronouns, while job positions that require female or male specific privacy will be forced to be given to anyone who declares themselves either or both genders. The ruling also paves the way for male takeover of institutions intended for females, such as athletics. The outcome of this case will have significant cultural and social implications throughout every institution in the United States. The Civil Rights Act still does not protect individuals’ political freedoms, one of the most common reasons for unfair job termination today. This will also incentivize people to become homosexuals or transgender to access potential future advantages, like Affirmative Action quotas. This is a new step on the staircase of American madness with immediate and long-term consequences. These matters, in a true Constitutional republic, would be decided through legislation. Instead, we are ruled by an echo chamber of unelected judges who were all educated at Harvard and Yale, and whether they are Republican or Democrat makes no difference.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 8.
#1. To: Ada (#0)
According to local reporting, Bostock was trusted with public money set aside to train volunteers to help foster children. Bostock went on to spend the money on food and liquor for his LGBT-only softball team at Atlanta gay bars “Cowtippers” and “F.R.O.G.S.” In the eyes of SCOTUS, Bostock and his gay friends, who drank and ate away money meant for orphans, were the real victims in the scandal. With this first case I would say that SCOTUS needs an attitude adjustment. ;)
According to local reporting, Bostock was trusted with public money set aside to train volunteers to help foster children. Bostock went on to spend the money on food and liquor for his LGBT-only softball team at Atlanta gay bars “Cowtippers” and “F.R.O.G.S.” In the eyes of SCOTUS, Bostock and his gay friends, who drank and ate away money meant for orphans, were the real victims in the scandal. With this first case I would say that SCOTUS needs an attitude adjustment. ;) Maybe it's WE who need the attitude ajustment. Maybe we need to get the hell out of Babylon "...We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure"). Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code which is private international law. The written credit agreement -- the Jewish shetar is a lien on all of the property in the world. The treatise also explains that the Jews are owned by Great Britain and that the Jews are in charge of the Baking system. We are living under the Babylonian Talmud. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the various religions ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things that do not exist. Private International Law, which is commercial law, only deals with fictions, known as persons. A person is a fictional entity at law, not a living being. See UCC 1-201. Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry people, you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below. "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520 You have to understand that Great Britain, (Article six Section one) the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you. Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why? Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why? Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters property!..." https://republic4dummies.blogspot.com/2011/03/ultimate-delusion.html
President Donnell's deep state transsexual SCOTUS appointments, ain't working out too well for America.
President Donnell's deep state transsexual SCOTUS appointments, ain't working out too well for America. I must be stupid. I am at least ignorant of the 2017 Guardian. Are you saying Trump is gay...and his SC appointments?? and who's the guy with the fan? Do I even want to know? can this world get any more bizarre??
The gay teacher of the year. Yeah, Donnell & his personal lawyer Ruby Giuliani are queer.
#9. To: hondo68 (#8)
whoa. i'd seen guiliani in drag before but not this skit with trump. he's not play-acting? what about melania? his son at least LOOKS like him. are you sure?? is that what they have on him? i'm floored.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestIn Bostock v. Clayton County, a gay man named Gerald Bostock was fired from his job as an official at the Clayton County Juvenile Court for misusing funds.
#3. To: BTP Holdings (#1)
In Bostock v. Clayton County, a gay man named Gerald Bostock was fired from his job as an official at the Clayton County Juvenile Court for misusing funds.
#5. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, Donnell the ghey (#3)
#6. To: hondo68 (#5)
Donnell the ghey
#8. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, Drag Queen Story Hour (#6)
who's the guy with the fan?
Replies to Comment # 8.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 8.