[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?


Immigration
See other Immigration Articles

Title: Mr. President: If Minutemen Are Vigilantes, What Do You Call 500,000 Illegal Aliens Demanding Rights?
Source: newsbyus.com
URL Source: http://newsbyus.com/more.php?id=3000_0_1_0
Published: Apr 10, 2006
Author: By: Citizen Conservative
Post Date: 2006-04-10 18:13:32 by Mind_Virus
Keywords: None
Views: 180
Comments: 15

Mr. President: If Minutemen Are Vigilantes, What Do You Call 500,000 Illegal Aliens Demanding Rights?

By: Citizen Conservative: on Apr 10, 2006

When the Minutemen set up shop at the Arizona border last year to call attention to the illegal alien loophole in US Homeland Security, President Bush foolishly chided these brave patriots by calling them vigilantes. Although chagrined at being deserted by the man who has the constitutional responsibility and authority to defend our borders, the Minutemen dug in their heels and persisted. And persisted.

Their Yankee determination to do the right thing was rewarded when President Bush finally sent additional border patrol agents to Arizona. Even the Mexican government was motivated to pay greater attention, at least temporarily, because of the due diligence of heroic Minutemen.

Before the Minuteman took their courageous stand, open border advocates and anti-American liberals insisted it was “impossible” to stop illegal immigration. Best to just accept reality, learn Spanish, and switch to rice and beans as food stables, according to the leftists and Hispanic racists.

Thank God, the Minutemen PROVED illegal aliens CAN be stopped, thereby delivering a great victory on behalf of all American citizens.

Now, with hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants and advocates taking over the streets of American cities and demanding rights they are not entitled to, where in the hell is our alleged President?

How is that a few hundred retired seniors with lawn chairs and cell phones are vigilantes, while 500,000 people with no legal or moral basis for being here are able to romp through Los Angeles and Dallas, without so much as a peep from Mr. Bush?

Does Mr. Bush even understand that America is on the brink of civil war? Must violence and bloodshed erupt before this president secures the borders and takes appropriate actions to remove those here illegally?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

#2. To: Mind_Virus, Christine, Diana, Zipporah, robin, Zoroaster, BTP Holdings, Arator, Brian S, A K A Stone, Steppenwolf, Bub, mugwort, bluegrass, Bill D Berger, FormerLurker, Uncle Bill, Dakmar, Flintlock, Neil McIver, tom007, aristeides, Burkeman1, Diana, All (#0)

Start with the fact that ALL offenders are CURRENTLY covered, not just the Mexicans.

At the moment, ALL the 'illegals' are criminals.

If they are documented, they are 'busted.'

If they are on record for past offenses, they are ineligible for 'legal' status - UNLESS there is an "amnesty" in any new law. (God forbid!)

The same is true of any U.S. employers, which can be documented.

"Mr. Smith, while you were working under-the-table along with all those Mexicans; you're not covered under this law, besides back-taxes owed; you have the right to remain silent, you have the right..."

Keep this one in perspective!


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2006-04-10   18:36:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: SKYDRIFTER (#2)

How is that a few hundred retired seniors with lawn chairs and cell phones are vigilantes, while 500,000 people with no legal or moral basis for being here are able to romp through Los Angeles and Dallas, without so much as a peep from Mr. Bush?

Well of course because he wants them here, he invited them over with his talk of amnesty.

robin  posted on  2006-04-10   18:41:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: robin, all (#3)

Well of course because he wants them here, he invited them over with his talk of amnesty.

There has to be a method to apparent madness.

My hunch is that there is a general war on labor - period.

BUT, so much of "America" is being internally and systematically eroded, I suspect that it's far more than just that.

That article from South Africa brings a fresh perspective to U.S. politics.

Are we being programmed to 'buy" into a 'peacable' situation - guaranteed to get radically worse, or stand up for the "America" that we love?

I choose the latter.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2006-04-10   19:12:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: SKYDRIFTER (#4)

............or stand up for the "America" that we love?

I want you to know that I agree with you completely. I am concerned, though, with the President's military. He is, we should remind ourselves, the C.I.C. of all the military. That includes even the Coast Guard, maybe even the Merchant Marine? Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, etc. Throw in Blackwater for good measure. FBI, ATF, NSA, BATF, yikes - you name it. We're talkin' a lotta folks here. Oh, yeah, they're Good Americans All - BUT - so many of them have been in the service for several years, thereby thinking now of retirement, benefits, medical, whatever. All the benefits that put food into their mouth and into the mouths of their wives and children.... Those are the guys we would be fighting if we 'stood up for America'. They have weaponry we never even have dreamed of. They would laugh at our M-1's and AR-15's. Their satellites can find us wherever we are. Plus - they really don't feel much solidarity with us, anyway. If Jorge says 'sic-em!', they'll bite us without thinking. I'm a paleo-Conservative. I'll stand up for America. Anyway. P.S. Jorge would easily Federalize all local police forces, also.....

Bub  posted on  2006-04-10   19:38:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 7.

#8. To: Bub (#7)

They have weaponry we never even have dreamed of. They would laugh at our M-1's and AR-15's.

We laughed at the Iraqi's AK-47s and Makarov pistols in 2003 too. Looks like the joke's on FEDGOV.

Pissed Off Janitor  posted on  2006-04-10 19:41:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Bub (#7)

I seriously doubt that too many troops would attack civilians, on a wholesale basis. Yeah, we've had our "Wacos." Those are pretty isolated, as bad as they were.

In any event, I'll risk those troops, before I'll submit to slavery - "...in the name of the state."


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2006-04-10 19:51:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Bub (#7)

this is what i've always said, Bub, they've got us beat because there are too many in this country dependent on a government check in one way or another. we're outmanned.

christine  posted on  2006-04-10 19:52:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Bub (#7)

Those are the guys we would be fighting if we 'stood up for America'. They have weaponry we never even have dreamed of. They would laugh at our M-1's and AR-15's. Their satellites can find us wherever we are. Plus - they really don't feel much solidarity with us, anyway. If Jorge says 'sic-em!', they'll bite us without thinking. I'm a paleo-Conservative. I'll stand up for America. Anyway. P.S. Jorge would easily Federalize all local police forces, also.....

They wouldn't just bite us without thinking....they would gleefully do it with a song in their hearts. Make no mistake about this.

orangedog  posted on  2006-04-10 21:25:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]