See other World News Articles
Title: Whistleblower: New Epstein Tapes Show Top Supreme Court Justice Being Blackmailed
Source:
The Clover Chronicle
URL Source: https://cloverchronicle.com/2020/07 ... 8BcNNJbPeqhRg3Pm1cnpBLgvWYjN0k
Published: Jul 7, 2020
Author: Clover Chronicle
Post Date: 2020-07-13 10:22:08 by Bill D Berger
Keywords: None
Views: 922
Comments: 11
Early last Tuesday morning, a whistleblower who allegedly works in the federal circuit revealed a Supreme Court justice was seen in various “Epstein tapes” that were recently recovered by investigators: “One of the SCOTUS [justices] is in the Epstein tapes that were recovered yesterday. I’m sure you can guess which one. “The shocking part is the canary is telling the feds a certain nation state has been blackmailing this gentleman since prior to his nomination to SCOTUS. “What does this mean? This justice was hand picked at the highest levels specifically because he was being controlled via blackmail. A sheep in wolf’s clothing appearing to be which he is not. “Cat is out of the bag… or I should say almost.” The “canary” the whistleblower is referring to may very well be Jeffrey Epstein’s former madam, Ghislaine Maxwell. The “nation state” that has been blackmailing the justice was later confirmed to be “one of the 5 eyes”: “…It’s not Israel. It’s not even Russia/China. One of the 5 eyes.” After being prodded by readers to disclose the exact country, the whistleblower stated the following: “I don’t know which country, but UK was in bed with our deep state intelligence agencies trying to dig up dirt on Trump. I don’t think that is even questioned anymore. Outside of my area of specific knowledge though.” Also, since it was mentioned that the justice is a male (e.g. “gentleman”), some have speculated how it might be the Chief Justice. The name “John Roberts” reportedly appears in Epstein’s infamous “little black book”: The whistleblower continued: “Here is the best part. The SCOTUS justice on the tapes – it is being rumored in the federal court community – has sat down with the FBI to roll on a previous president AND wife in an effort to keep his position, or more likely, be allowed to gracefully retire before the next SCOTUS term. “If I were going to predict the future we are going to see a resignation in about 2-3 weeks as the last of the SCOTUS cases for this term are just about done.” Read more here (Warning: may contain some NSFW content) 
A screenshot from Jeffrey Epstein’s “little black book.” (Source: Unknown / Unconfirmed) 
In 2019, the Daily Mail published an article that included information about a passenger identified as “John Roberts” flying with Epstein on at least two occasions. (Source / Archive link)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Bill D Berger (#0)
Roberts gives every appearance of being on a leash but I doubt that leash is underage girls.
Bingo. “The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out... without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” ~ H. L. Mencken
Judges have the same OR GREATER chance of being slime bags than the general population. Having two in the family, they were and are rotten inside out, top to bottom. Never automatically trust Judges, lawyers and police. That would be foolhardy.
Roberts' wife was unable to get pregnant. They pulled some strings and adopted two young Irish girls. They ended up having to take some heat for that. :-/ "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
Irish law does not permit Irish children to be adopted out of the country. Not a question of taking heat. They committed an illegal act. If there is no statute of limitations, the Irish government could ask for their return.
If there is no statute of limitations, the Irish government could ask for their return. It is not Irish law that forbids adoption by parents outside of Ireland, it is the Hague Convention of which Ireland is not a signatory. Do you really think Ireland would cause an international uproar by demanding those two children be returned to Ireland where they would likely be forced into foster homes? ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
The children were privately adopted from some South American country but both have blonde hair and blue eyes, suggesting European origin. From The Thinker; Which European country makes both private adoptions and out-of-country adoptions illegal? Yep. Ireland. Therefore, as the rumor has it, the Roberts children must have been born in the Emerald Isle and therefore their adoptions in America must have been illegal. Clearly the chief justice was ripe for blackmail if there were facts to back it up. Be a shame to see your family broken up over ObamaCare, wouldn't it, Chief?
Ireland is not a signatory to the Hague Conventions on adoptions. Look that up so you will understand this more fully. ;) "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
Could this be a human trafficking story. Was Epstein into making a buck on adopting children for rich people?
So why does The Hague conventions have anything to do with Roberts irregular adoptions from Ireland if, indeed it was Ireland? Is it because Ireland also prohibits private adoptions whereas the Hague conventions do not?
If the children were indeed Irish, it just means the Roberts were violating Irish law. If they weren't Irish, perhaps no laws were broken. Because Roberts appears to be under outside control, best guess is illegal adoption.
#2. To: Ada (#1)
...I doubt that leash is underage girls.
#3. To: Lod (#2)
#4. To: Ada (#1)
Roberts gives every appearance of being on a leash
#5. To: BTP Holdings (#4)
(Edited)
#6. To: Ada (#5)
Irish law does not permit Irish children to be adopted out of the country. Not a question of taking heat. They committed an illegal act.
#7. To: BTP Holdings (#6)
Do you really think Ireland would cause an international uproar by demanding those two children be returned to Ireland where they would likely be forced into foster homes? ;)
#8. To: Ada (#7)
Ireland.
#9. To: Ada (#7)
The children were privately adopted from some South American country but both have blonde hair and blue eyes, suggesting European origin.
#10. To: BTP Holdings (#8)
#11. To: johnj (#9)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest